Gregg Berhalter was hired just a little over 3 years ago. In that time, he’s put up fairly impressive numbers and won two major trophies for the US Men’s National time. Just over halfway through qualifying for the Qatar World Cup, it’s a good time to review his performance as a head coach.
What can we learn from the USMNT if we just look at the 96 goals that have been scored under Gregg’s watch? There’s a lot of interesting information to be gleaned. It doesn’t have the depth of detail that shots or other detailed data might have but each goal is in and of itself a crucial moment and an encapsulation of the team’s approach.
To analyse these goals I went back through video of each one. I did my best to categorize the phase of possession in which they were scored as well as the key events leading up to them, and the players that performed those events. This can help us see who makes the biggest contribution to the USMNT offense.
First, a little bit of a glossary to explain the terms I’m using.
The phase of possession describes what is happening on the field during the goal. A direct attack started in the USA half before moving quickly into the opponent third and creating the goal before the defense can be settled. A transition moment is when the attacking move started in the opponent half, whether through a turnover or winning a 50/50 or aerial duel. In some cases I have included long carries as well. In these cases the defense was still disorganized like in a direct attack. Breaking down a set defense is what it sounds like – the defense was able to recover and pack the box, and the USMNT had to break them down.
The key event is the action that caused the defensive breakdown that led to the shooting opportunity. This is not necessarily the final or penultimate action, but the most important one to create the goal. Possession Play in this case means that there was no specific standout event, but a series of passes to create the opportunity.
The key pass/action is the final action before the shot. If a player passes to the shooter, that’s the key pass. In some cases, that’s not a pass; it’s a foul, a carry, or something else. The assists in the chart above do not track with official statistics – just creating the opportunity gives you an “assist”, it does not have to be a pass.
General Observations
First, the transition Berhalter has made over time away from using long balls to create offense is obvious. Berhalter favored Michael Bradley, Will Trapp, and even Jackson Yueill early on, but has moved away from that style to make room for players like Tyler Adams and Kellyn Acosta.
Instead, there has been a clear increase in scoring from turnovers. This tracks with personnel choices and a general increase in the high press. The press always been a part of Berhalter’s approach, but for whatever reason turnovers been a major source of goals in 2021. Part of it is the personnel, but I think there is a growing level of tactical maturity with the coaches and players as well.
Also of note is that the USMNT is showing an ability to break down better opponents. This has always been a criticism of the Berhalter system – creativity is not prioritized in the midfield and forwards, and at times the team has seemed helpless against a tough, organized defense.
Looking more closely into the actions directly preceding a goal is interesting as well. As a bit of prior reading, I can’t recommend the Where Goals Come From series enough. The three most productive key actions are crosses from the end line, cutbacks, and layoffs. Cutbacks and end line crosses can appear similar but I drew a line between them. For me, cutbacks are passes that are both low to the ground and moving away from the goal. A layoff is a short pass in the penalty box from one attacking player to another.
Cutbacks are a very efficient means of creating scoring chances, with a high conversion rate from the subsequent shot. We have seen the USMNT trying to create cutbacks intentionally – think the way Tim Weah attacked Mexico in the World Cup Qualifying matchup.
If there’s any criticism to the approach, it’s that the over reliance on attacks from outside (cutbacks and crosses) means that the most dangerous pass, the through ball, is a little under represented. Being able to create scoring chances for forwards and wingers with balls between defenders will help add variety in the attack.
Who Creates Goals?
Who are the best players when it comes to scoring or creating goals against quality opposition?
If we limit it to just opponents who had an Elo rating of 1600 or more, that filters out most of the weak opponents that offer little resistance.
The first thing to notice is that Sebastian Lletget leads the team in goals or goal creating actions. That seems counterintuitive for all the complaining about his place on the team, but it makes sense. Lletget is actually good in the final third; it’s just when he is asked to help out in buildup or ball progression that he struggles. He’s also played the most minutes against this band of opponents by a fair margin.
Pulisic, Reyna, Pepi, and Weah stand out as major contributors. The challenge for Berhalter is finding a way to get all four of these players on the field at the same time. Lewis and Gioacchini have also done well but in very limited minutes, so it is hard to draw too many conclusions from that.
Sargent has not contributed to a goal against a decent opponent, despite having 380 minutes to do so. I think that he has to figure out how to make an impact before we see him on the field much more for the USMNT.
The midfield is the biggest area that needs improvement. Musah is the most promising, averaging a goal creating action in just under every two games. McKennie struggles to create goals, as does Adams. Roldan surprised me; I hardly remember any contributions from him but he has helped create 3 goals in just 637 minutes against quality opponents. Still, that is a lower rate than when he plays for Seattle. This is an area where Gregg needs to experiment.
Wrapping it up
There are plenty of limitations to this approach to analyzing Berhalter’s system, but it can still highlight some potential issues. As Berhalter begins to prepare this team for a qualifying stretch run, there are questions that need to be answered and squad weaknesses that need to be addressed to have the team operating at its highest level.
Over the decades, the United States Men’s National Soccer Team has been accompanied by a wide range of voices behind the microphone, delivering some of the most memorable calls in World Cup history.
Along the way, several standout broadcast duos have helped shape the viewing experience and left a lasting mark on the USMNT landscape.
Here’s a look back at the voices that have defined US World Cup broadcasts since 1990.
1990 FIFA World Cup – Italy
Network: ESPN
Play-by-play: Bob Ley
Color: Paul Gardner
Coverage of the USMNT at the 1990 World Cup was limited, particularly in the early rounds, but Bob Ley emerged as one of the defining voices of soccer on U.S. television during that era. His presence helped introduce a new generation of American fans to the international game, providing context and credibility at a time when the global stage still felt unfamiliar to much of the US audience.
1994 FIFA World Cup – United States of America
1998 FIFA World Cup – France
2002 FIFA World Cup – Japan / South Korea
Networks: ABC / ESPN
Play-by-play: JP Dellacamera
Color: Ty Keough
This play-by-play and color commentary duo called three World Cups for the USMNT, becoming the defining voice of the team during my peak viewing years. Ty Keough the former USMNT midfielder from the late 1970s and early 1980s.
JP Dellacamera stands out as one of, if not the, best play-by-play announcers and remains one of my favorites. While others on this list delivered memorable moments, they didn’t quite match that same level of longevity.
2006 FIFA World Cup – Germany
Networks: ABC / ESPN
Play-by-play: Dave O’Brien
Color: Marcelo Balboa
New England native Dave O’Brien, widely known today for calling major sports across his career, had just one World Cup as the primary play-by-play voice for the USMNT. His run calling USMNT matches, primarily in the mid-2000s on ESPN, was relatively brief but still memorable. While he isn’t as closely associated with the USMNT as some other broadcasters, he was behind the mic for several standout moments during that era.
2010 FIFA World Cup – South Korea
Network: ESPN
Play-by-play: Ian Darke
Color: John Harkes
Ian Darke brought a global voice to American audiences as the lead play-by-play announcer for the USMNT during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Already well known around the world, he made the tournament easy to connect with for U.S. fans and delivered one of the most iconic calls in American soccer history.
Darke’s iconic call of the USMNT game winning goal by Landon Donovan in must win final group stage match against Algeria to advance to the knockout stage of the 2010 World Cup gives me chills every time I see it.
2014 FIFA World Cup – Brazil
Networks: ESPN / ABC
Play-by-play: Ian Darke
Color: Taylor Twellman
This duo might be my favorite to date. Ian Darke brought a clear, global voice to USMNT viewers during the 2014 FIFA World Cup, making the tournament easy to follow for US fans while elevating the biggest moments with calm, sharp, and memorable calls.
Alongside him, Taylor Twellman emerged as one of the most recognizable and influential voices of the modern era, primarily as a lead analyst on ESPN. His passionate, unfiltered style stood out, most notably with his unforgettable “What are we doing?!” reaction following the USMNT’s failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, a moment that’s still talked about today.
2022 FIFA World Cup – Qatar
Network: FOX Sports
Play-by-play: John Strong
Color: Stu Holden
If the USMNT had qualified for the 2018 World Cup, this broadcast team would have called their matches, marking what would have been a third straight World Cup cycle with the same primary commentary crew. It’s also likely he’ll be paired again with Stu Holden for USMNT matches at the 2026 World Cup.
John Strong has served as a lead play-by-play voice for U.S. soccer on FOX Sports since 2018, bringing a modern, high-energy style to the booth. Since taking on major international assignments, he’s become one of the defining voices for USMNT audiences in top competitions, known for his clear, sharp calls and a big-game tone that fits the moment.
The growth and success of Major League Soccer has led to more players from around the world representing MLS at the World Cup, with this summer’s tournament expected to feature the highest total yet.
1998 was the first World Cup played after the launch of Major League Soccer. Here’s a breakdown of MLS-based players on World Cup rosters by year:
1998 – 18 (T-8th) Tied with Liga MX for 8th most. This would the first and only time the USMNT World Cup roster
2002 – 11 (18th) All 11 were from the USMNT
2006 – 15 (14th) 11 of the 15 were #USMNT players.
2010 – 6 (25th) The lowest total to date. Only 6 MLS players, with 4 on the USMNT. This coincided with the peak of US players based in Europe.
2014 – 21 (10th) Less than half were USMNT players, though the US still led the way the 10 most notably DeAndre Yedlin (20) getting the call.
2018 – 18 (11th) This number likely would’ve been significantly higher had the USMNT qualified, potentially pushing MLS into the top 7–8 leagues.
2022 – 36 (6th) The highest total yet, just behind Ligue 1 for 5th. Also worth noting, rosters expanded from 23 to 26 players for this tournament and the first time that the USA didn’t have the most players
Overall, the trend shows steady growth in MLS representation, both domestically and internationally.
MLS Pipeline Continues for the USMNT
It’s rare for a World Cup–qualified nation not to have a strong share of its players featured across tournament rosters. Canada was a recent exception in 2022, though their ties to MLS remain significant with multiple clubs in the league.
With roster selection less than a month away, it’s reasonable to expect that roughly a third of the #USMNT squad will come from MLS. Below is a positional breakdown of the MLS players Mauricio Pochettino has called in during his tenure as USMNT manager.
Goalkeepers
The USMNT is set to start an MLS-based goalkeeper at a World Cup for the first time, with all of the top options currently playing in MLS.
Chris Brady is one of the goalkeepers I’m most excited to watch in the coming cycles. He’s been performing at a high level in Major League Soccer and looks like a strong candidate to fill the long-term role as the USMNT’s primary starter over the next few cycles.
Chris Brady Roman Celentano Matt Freese Patrick Schulte Matt Turner
Defenders
Veteran center-backs Tim Ream and Miles Robinson seem likely to be selected with Blackmon a possibility depending on the health of the remaining pool. Arfsten seems to be almost a lock due to his ability to attack and create scoring chances with his crosses from the wing.
Max Arfsten Tristan Blackmon Tim Ream Miles Robinson
Midfielders
The USMNT has strong depth in midfield, and Mauricio Pochettino’s recent roster selections suggest he’ll likely round out the squad with some of the players listed below.
One of the biggest gaps in this USMNT roster is the true dynamic, creative spark in the attacking third. Diego Luna stands out in that role, capable of unsettling defenses, breaking lines, and changing the rhythm of a match. He’s exactly the type of player who could thrive in a super-sub role, coming on against tired legs and making an impact at this summer’s World Cup.
Sebastian Berhalter Diego Luna Jack McGlynn Cristian Roldan Timothy Tillman
Forwards
Striker may be the toughest position for the MLS group to crack the #USMNT World Cup roster, but Brian White is making a strong case, scoring eight goals in his first nine MLS matches at the time of writing.
Brian White is a highly productive, “old-school” style striker for the USMNT, known for his elite positioning, relentless work rate, and ability to finish in a variety of ways. That combination makes him a strong option as a striker off the bench, where he could be especially dangerous against tired defenses at this summer’s World Cup.
Paxten Aaronson Josh Sargent Brian White
MLS Representation in the USMNT Player Pool
Since 1998, the last time the majority of a USMNT World Cup roster was composed primarily of MLS-based players, it has become increasingly clear that a meaningful portion of the squad still comes from MLS. Consistently, roughly 30–40% of the roster has been drawn from the domestic league, reflecting a long-standing and relatively stable trend in player selection over time which I don’t seen changing anytime soon.
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
In light of the recent resignation of Matt Crocker, I revisited something I wrote nearly a decade ago, an early attempt to capture what I called the “Dark Decades of US Soccer.” At the time, the piece was overly long and packed with detail—probably more than today’s audience would stick with.
But buried in that work were meaningful patterns, clear, recurring behaviors that shaped how the federation operated more than 60 years ago. What stood out most, looking back now, is how familiar some of those patterns still feel today.
So, I went back, stripped the piece down, and pulled out the most relevant sections, those that highlight the parallels between past and present. The goal isn’t to draw conclusions for you, but to put those similarities side by side and let you decide: how much has really changed?
World Cup Momentum to the First American Soccer Boom
Soccer star Pele in action during World Cup competition.
Photo of Pele at the 1966 World Cup Photograph: AP Photo
After the success and popularity of the 1966 World Cup which saw over one million viewers of the tournament many America investors saw the vision and believed that there was the market for soccer in the United States and Canada.
The investors moved very quickly and in 1967 there were two American professional leagues making their debuts the USSFA-sanctioned United Soccer Association (USA) and the independent National Professional Soccer League (NPSL).
These leagues would only last one year and be merged at the request of FIFA into the North American Soccer League (NASL) kicking off in 1968 and relying on mainly on foreign talent. The American investors believed building the interest in soccer in the US would have a direct impact on the growth and performance of the US Men’s National team which and of course more money for the investors and federation.
First Attempt at Modernizing the USMNT
Phil Woosnam, in 1977 as the commissioner of the NASL. Photograph: AP Photo
Off the back of the success of the inaugural NASL season, the U.S. Soccer Federation appointed Phil Woosnam, fresh off leading the Atlanta Chiefs to a championship and earning Coach of the Year honors, to take charge of the U.S. Men’s National Team.
Woosnam immediately shifted the structure of the program. Instead of a player pool selected by committee, he pushed decision-making toward the coaching staff, allowing selections to be based on performance and fit rather than geography or internal bias. The move was not universally welcomed, and it reportedly created friction with members of the federation’s leadership.
With professional players now more fully available, Woosnam’s approach helped assemble what was widely considered the strongest possible squad at the time. He also introduced organized training camps ahead of friendlies and World Cup qualifiers, an uncommon practice in that era, but one that clearly improved cohesion and preparation. Those changes contributed to the U.S. advancing further in World Cup qualifying than it had in previous cycles.
By early 1969, the USMNT appeared to be building real momentum toward a potential place in the 1970 World Cup. However, tensions between Woosnam and the federation began to escalate. Frustrated with compensation issues and growing interference from the USSF in team operations, Woosnam stepped away from the national team in the spring of 1969. become commissioner of the NASL.
Following his departure, assistant coach Gordon Jago took over as manager. His tenure began under difficult circumstances, with not being able to set up pre-qualifying friendlies, an important part of the progress made under Woosnam along with interference from USSF board members as it related to roster selection which created instability and morale issues on the field. The USMNT struggled in qualifying and ultimately fell short, losing both matches to Haiti, a team they had previously been competitive with in a series of friendlies in 1968.
The Crocker Era: Coaching Chaos and Course Corrections
Photo of Cindy Parlow Cone, Gregg Berhalter, Matt Crocker and JT Batson Photograph: AP Photo/Lucas Peliter
It’s been roughly three years since the Matt Crocker era began at U.S. Soccer, when he stepped in as Sporting Director, replacing Earnie Stewart.
One of Crocker’s first major responsibilities was hiring the next U.S. Men’s National Team manager. In the previous cycle, the federation had reportedly operated with a narrow set of internal criteria, preferences widely believed to favor English-speaking and American candidates, which significantly limited the coaching pool and shaped the direction of the search.
Roughly two months later, during the Concacaf Nations League semifinal window, it was announced that Gregg Berhalter would be reappointed as USMNT head coach. The decision caught many around the program and in the media off guard, raising questions about how the process had ultimately unfolded.
More recently, in an interview with GiveMeSport, Jesse Marsch stated he was effectively told he was set to become the next USMNT head coach in the late spring of 2023, only for that opportunity to be withdrawn at the last moment, a shift that reportedly had ripple effects on a potential move to Leicester City that was nearing completion.
The abrupt reversal and eventual rehiring of Berhalter has been widely attributed to a mix of factors, including rumored influence from within the player pool, with U.S. Soccer ultimately reversing course. Roughly a year later, after a disappointing Copa América campaign on home soil, Berhalter was dismissed.
Crocker’s second opportunity to reset the program took a different direction. He first secured the high-profile appointment of Emma Hayes, one of the most accomplished managers in women’s football, to lead the USWNT. That move was followed by the hiring of Mauricio Pochettino for the USMNT, a tenure that has delivered mixed early results and will ultimately be judged through the lens of the 2026 World Cup on home soil but truly disappointed that Crocker wouldn’t see through what he helped build, and you have to ask yourself why?