USMNT
World Cup Positional Depth Chart
Published
4 years agoon
Introduction
Welcome to my World Cup Positional Depth Chart, a tier list I’ve worked on for 2 months that sorts the best players for all 32 teams into various tiers based on a rough approximation of how good the “best” players for a nation are.
I’ve sorted the best players from every NT’s player pool into 6 positional groups(or PG’s): Centerbacks, Midfielders, Wingers/Second Attackers, Fullbacks/Wingbacks, Strikers, and Goalkeepers.
Players are tiered based on the average “goodness” of their countries’ best players at a specific PG. This means that a Tier 1 level midfielder can be sorted into a lower tier if his national team’s other first choice mids aren’t as good.
Each National team has 11 players sorted into tiers. The distribution of these players for each PG is determined by the formation each National Team typically uses. For example, if a team typically uses two midfielders, that team’s two best midfielders will be sorted, collectively, into a tier. If a team typically uses three center backs, then their three best center backs will be ranked collectively. In cases where a National Team is using various formations interchangeably, I’ll choose one that allows for more talent to see the field. In cases where there’s a coaching change, lineups after the coaching change will be prioritized as reference.
As a bonus, I have ranked players from the United States Men’s National Team who aren’t necessarily “first-choice”.
What This List is not
This is not a measure of how effectively players for different national teams mesh with each other. This is also not an assessment of potential; “Talent” or “goodness” here is simply how good a player currently is. This also isn’t definitive, it’s meant to be a conversation starter; disagreement is encouraged.
Criteria
For this project, a player’s “goodness” is determined by their hypothetical impact on winning in various situations. To estimate how good each player is I’ve considered the following criterion:
- Current Value
- Team Performance (domestic and international)
- Strength of Competition (league quality is approximated based on various metrics including, but not limited to, national team representation, Gfl rankings, Transfermarkt valuations, average wage, ect.)
- Minutes Played (adjusting for physical availability)
- Impact (Does a player’s presence correlate with improved team performance? Overperformance of expectations? Stronger defensive performance?)
- Market perception (who’s tried to buy a player, team’s valuations, ect, ect.)
- Historic Value (Class over Form)
- Team Performance
- Strength of Competition
- Impact
- Minutes Played
- Accolades
- Recency
- Age/Health
- Data
- Eye Test/Film-Tracking
- Granular Metrics (g/a, chances created, post-shot xg, ect.)
- Holistic Metrics (G+, IMPECT, ect)
- Underlying Metrics (xG, xA, xT, ect.)
- Clutchness
- Performance in big games (club or country)
- Performance against better competition (club or country)
- Team Context
- Stylistic Fit
- Distribution of “goodness” (Ex: Dortmund are disproportionately weak defensively while Crystal Palace are disproportionately strong defensively)
- Versatility (How has a player’s value performance/value translated in various situations/roles)
With that out of the way…
World Cup Positional Depth Chart
Goalkeepers
Tier 1
Courtois, Allison or Ederson, De Gea, Neuer, Navas
Tier 2
Lloris, Musso or Rulli, Pickford, Onana, Muslera, Smhiechel, Sommer, Bonou, Patricio, Szczęsny, Mendy
Tier 3
Eliji Kawashinma, Beiranvand, Borjan, Rajković, Livaković, Krul, Ryan, Sad Al Sheeb
(Both Turner and Horvath go here)
Tier 4
Ochoa, Hennesey, Kim Seung-gyu
(Sean Johnson, Stefan Frei, Gaga Slonina, Brad Stuver, and Josh Cohen go here)
Tier 5
Attah, Galindez, Al-Owas, Mouez Hassen
(Zack Steffen goes here)
Notes
-> Keylor Navas and Jordan Pickford both get a “clutch” boost from disproportionately strong national team performances in WCQ and the Euros respectively.
-> Navas also gets a boost from “historic value”having arguably peaked as the best keeper on the planet. Going by recent club play Navas is not a “Tier 1” keeper, but the combination of maybe the most impressive carry-job from anyone in this cycle’s world cup qualifiers and a very impressive track record (for club and country) affords him some leeway.
-> Despite the relative weakness of the “Qatar Stars League”, Qatari keeper Saad Al Sheeb rides a decade of international success, a half-decade of domestic dominance, and a solid set of individual accolades (for both club and country) into Tier 3. Leagues are not monoliths. Between a 3rd place finish at the Club World Cup, an AFC Champions league win, and 3 league titles in the last four years, Al Saad has established themselves as a formidable force in Asia. At the heart of this success was Al Sheeb who has emerged as one of the continent’s most accomplished players.
Strikers
Tier 1:
Lewandowski, Benzema, Kane, Messi
Tier 2:
Ronaldo, Neymar, Lukaku/Origi, Werner/Havertz, David/Larin, Vlahovic, Depay, Suarez/Nunez
Tier 3:
Raul Jiminez, Poulsen, Bale, Nesyri, De Jong, Choupo-Mouting/Aboubakar, Dia, Kramaric, Azmoun/Taremi
(Pefok goes here)
Tier 4:
Asano, Ui-Jo, Khazri, Gyan, Embolo, Akim Afif
(Jesus Ferreira, Sargent, Wright, and Vasquez go here)
Tier 5:
Duke, Estrada, Al-Sheri, Ugalde
(Pepi, Hoppe, and Zardes go here with everyone else)
Notes
-> Ronaldo registers higher here than one might expect based on his recent form thanks to what he’s accomplished in previous seasons. With the Portuguese attacker reportedly pushing for a move in the off-season, I’m considering CR7’s production last season more relevant to assessing him than his goal-less start to this one. Rating Ronaldo is tricky as his granular production and impact signals don’t always line up; on one hand Ronaldo contributed to many goals(0.77 g/a per 90 in the league) for a disappointing United last season. On the other, United became disappointing after they signed him. I think fit is a large factor here (Ragnick is the father of Geggenpressing and Ronaldo, now in his 30’s, isn’t a forward you should be asking to running at defenders), but between United underperforming, his limitations (age-induced) in other facets of the game, and a goal-less start to 22-23, it’s hard to justify placing him at the top.
-> One might be tempted to bump Messi off Tier 1 due to diminished goal-scoring, a move to a significantly weaker league, and the myriad benefits that come when you play on a team that is much better than any of your (domestic) competition. On the other hand, Messi was one of the best creators in Ligue 1 last year(Top 5 in chances created, PPA, xA, assists, and progressive passes), scored at a high rate against elite European competition(5 goals in 7 games), and played a key role for Argentina in a Copa America win and an undefeated qualifying campaign against the most difficult qualification schedule in the world. Additionally, Messi significantly underperformed his xG last season(may just be a cold-streak) and his scoring has seemingly returned(to some extent) for 2022-23. All that considered, I still have Messi in the top tier of forwards.
-> American forward Pefok is tricky to assess for a number of reasons. For one, he’s disproportionately weak at non-scoring aspects at the game. For another his sample size against elite competition is incredibly small. Pefok has 7 g/a over 12 games in the last 2 seasons against teams in the top 4 leagues. Making this more impressive is that most of those goals and games came on a plucky Swiss underdog against teams good enough to qualify for European competitions. While very impressive on the surface, the exceedingly small sample size, and Pefok’s weaknesses in other aspects(significant enough that he’s been left out of several US camps entirely) cast some doubt on the reigning Swiss Super League golden boot winner. That said, Pefok was signed by and is currently starting for a Bundesliga team that finished 5th last year and has started the current campaign tied on points with Bayern. While Union are likely to regress, they’ve done enough with Pefok as a starter to solidify Pefok as a Tier 3 attacker.
-> Welsh Forward Gareth Bale and Mexican Forward Raul Jiminez stay in Tier 3 largely due to what they’ve done previously. Raul Jiminez was Wolves most valuable player when they were pushing for Europe in 2019-20. Bale earns leeway thanks to highs achieved with maybe the greatest club team ever(Bale played a significant role in Madrid’s remarkable Champions League three-peat) and two massive performances against Austria and Ukraine in one-off wcq playoffs to send Wales to their first world cup in 64 years.
-> Costa Rican forward Manfred Ugalde refused call-ups during WCQ saying he won’t play for “Los Ticos” as long as Luis Fernando Suarez remains coach. Nonetheless, since Manfred is the most promising Costa Rican attacker since Joel Campbell, is getting regular minutes for one of the best teams in the eredivisie, and his national team is bereft of decent alternatives, for the sake of this depth chart, Manfred Ugalde will represent the Ticos.
-> Having yet to earn a start, Canadian forward Cyle Larin isn’t having the best of starts at Club Brugge. Form, however, is not class and Cyle Larin’s recent track-record includes leading all players in wcq in goals, scoring the second most international goals in 2021, and leading the front-line for the most prolific offense in Super Lig history. With all that in mind, I’m giving Larin some benefit of the doubt.
Wingers/Second Attackers:
Tier 1:
Viniscus/Ralphina, Mbappe/Coman, Sterling/Sancho, Silva/Jota, Sane/Muisala, KDB
Tier 2:
Alvares/Correa, Pino/Olmo, Alphonzo Davies/Buchanan, Mane/Sarr, Wijnaldum/Klassen, Tadic
(Pulisic and Aaronson go here)
Tier 3:
Corona/Lozano, Son/Hwang, Perisic/Vlasic, Vargas/Shaqiri, Ito/Takumi, Zlenski/Syzmanski, Ayew/Paintsil, Ziyech/Amallah
Tier 4:
Olsen/Damsgaard, Rossi/Pellistri, Gholizadeh/Jahanbakhsh, James/Morrell, Ekambi/Hongla, Muwallad/Al-Dawasari, Leal/Campbell, Valencia/Plata
(Weah and Tilman go here with Tilman being interchangeable with Djordje Mihailovic or Paul Arriola)
Tier 5:
Haydos/Hatem, Mabil/Boyle, Msakini/Sliti
(Arriola and Morris go here with everyone else)
Notes
-> Canada is an example of how looking at the average “goodness” of a PG instead of how good the best player from a PG can lead to different results. Tajon Buchanan is a good player on a good team but I don’t see him as a peer of players like Sancho, one of Europe’s most prolific chance creators at 20 with Dortmund, or Jota, a first-choice starter for one of the most dominant club sides in history. Thus, Canada drop to Tier 2, even with maybe the best left-back on the planet in Davies.
-> While Davies usually plays as a left-back with Bayern, Canada usually plays him as an out and out attacker. Additionally, listing Davies as an attacker allows room for Canada’s other fullbacks on the field. Remember, this ranking prioritizes talent over fit.
-> Ghanian winger Joseph Plantsil has significantly upped his minutes for a Genk team that looks to be better in 2022-23 than it was in 2021-22. As a result my evaluation of Plantsil has improved lifting Ghana’s wingers from Tier 4 to Tier 3. Form may not be class, but it’s still something.
-> Serbia and Belgium mostly play with three center backs instead of two. The trade-off is they’re left with one second attacker instead of two wingers. For Belgium it’s creative maestro Kevin de Bruyne(KDB). For Serbia its savvy swiss army knife Dusan Tadic. PG classification doesn’t necessarily align with the specific function a player serves for their national team. Again, this ranking prioritizes talent over fit.
Fullbacks/Wingbacks
Tier 1:
Alexander-Arnold/Walker, Hernandez/Pavard, Azpilacueta/Alba, Danilo/Milatoa, Cancelo/Mendez, Kimmich/Gosens
Tier 2:
Tagliafico/Molina, Kostic/Zivkovic, Araujo/Oliveira, Sarr/Toure, Hakimi/Mazraoui, Thorgan Hazard/Meunier
(Sergino Dest and Antonee Robinson go here)
Tier 3:
Sosa/Juranovic, Larsen/Maehle, Arteaga/Sanchez, Gamboa/Matarrita, Preciado/Estupinan, Widmer/Rodriguez, Bereszyński/Cash, Wass/Maehl, Al Breik/Al Shahrani
(Joe Scally and Sam Vines go here with Vines being interchangeable with Yedlin or Henry Wingo)
Tier 4:
Mensah/Odoi, Tolo/Oyongo, Maaloul/Drager, Adekugbe/Johnston, Nagatomo/Yamane
(Deandre Yedlin and Henry Wingo go here with either being interchangeable with Reggie Cannon, Shaq Moore, John Tolkien, Kevin Paredes, and DeJuan Jones)
Tier 5:
Moharrami/Amiri, Ahmed/Ro-Ro, Yong-Lee/Kwin-Moon-Han, Atkinson/Behich, Robert/Williams
(Shaq Moore and George Bello go here with everyone else)
Notes
-> English right back Trent Alexander-Arnold(TAA) hasn’t been a first-choice starter for Gareth Southgate’s England. TAA has been a first-choice starter for a Liverpool side who’s current iteration has few historical peers. Trent has been Liverpool’s primary chance creator and a critical opponent for their attack. Trent has arguably been the best creator in England, leading the league in expected assists, chances created, and progressive passes; finishing second in assists and passes towards the 18(PPA), and finishing 8th in expected threat(xT). Considering that Trent is also a solid ball carrier and a decent(if not spectacular) defender, you’d be hard-pressed to argue TAA isn’t one of the best players around. While he may not fit into Southgate’s plans, TAA is, for my money, one of the best players in the world and therefore an easy choice for Tier 1.
-> Despite the relative weakness of the Saudi Professional League, Saudi right back Mohammed Al Breik, like many of his countrymen, rides the tide that is Al Hilal SC. Dubbed the “The Asian Galacticos”, Al Hilal hold a record 8 AFC Champions league titles(2 from the last 4 years), a record 18 Saudi Professional League titles(5 from the last 6), is ranked #1 in Asia by most ranking sites, and was voted as the “Best Asian Club of the 20th century” by IFFHS. Put simply, Al Hilal is the crown prince of Asian football, and Al Breik, a regular fixture since 2015, has shared in its glory. With two AFC Champions League wins, 5 Saudi Professional League wins, 2 top 4 finishes at the Club World Cup, a combined 13 major trophies in 9 years as a pro, and a spot in the IFFHS “AFC Team of the Decade”, Al Breik is a giant in Asian football. Saudi left back Yasser Al-Shahrani didn’t get a spot in the “AFC Team of the Decade” like Al Breik, but has won the same silverware as a fixture in Al Hilal’s lineup and has won nearly twice as many caps for his country. Together, they represent “The Green Falcons” at Tier 3.
-> While they only employ one player on this list, Egyptian powerhouse Al Ahly represents an even higher tide than Al Hilal. Besides winning a record 10 CAF Champions leagues(2 of last 3), 42 domestic league titles(13 of the last 15), and just about everything that can be won in African soccer(usually more times than anyone else), “The Red Giant” have been quite successful outside of Africa, running the the table on Afro-Asian competitions and earning three Top 3 finishes at the Club World Cup(including its last 2 iterations). Notably, in the last CWC, they thumped the “Asian Galacticos” 4-0 to clinch bronze. The year before, they took third via a penalty win over Copa Libertadores champion Palmeiras. With Egypt’s national team missing out on Qatar, Al Ahly has one representative for 2022: Tunsian left back Ali Malooul. A mainstay for “The Red Giant ” since 2016, Ali Malooul has been named to the CAF team of the year three times and has been involved in the most successful era for arguably the most successful club team outside of UEFA or CONMEBOL. The same cannot be said for Tunisian right back Mohamed Drager who was loaned to the nearly relegated FC Luzern after making one matchday squad for championship side Nottingham Forest and 2 appearances for Nottingham Forest’s u-21 team(Mohamed is 26). Thus, despite Ali Malooul’s accomplishments, Tusnia’s wide backs slot into tier 4.
-> Moroccan right back Noussair Mazaroui finds himself in the unfortunate position of his country’s best player, Achraf Haikimi, playing the same position on the same side of the field. Thus, he’s usually left out of the lineup while natural left back Adam Masina plays on the other side. However, as far as quality goes, becoming a first choice starter for Ajax, reaching the champions league knockouts, and getting minutes for Bayern while being a fixture in the matchday squad are all solid indicators. As this project prioritizes quality over fit, Mazaroui gets to line-up for “The Atlas Lions” here, even if he won’t do it in Qatar.
Midfielders
Tier 1:
Kante/Pogba/Nkunku, Rodri/Koke/Gavi, Gundogan/Kimmich/Goretska, Casemiro/Fabinho/Fred, Paul/Peredes/Rodriguez
Tier 2:
Moutinho/Fernandes/Palhinha, Bellingham/Henderson/Phillips, Bentancur/Valverde, Wijnandum/De Jong/Van de Beek, Modric/Brozovic/Pasali, Gueye/Mendy/Kouyate, Eden Hazard/Witsel, Hojberg/Eriksen
(Mckennie, Adams, and Reyna go here)
Tier 3:
Herrera/Alvarez/Guardado, Freuler/Shaqiri/Zakaria, Savic/Lukic/Gudelj, Lee Jae-Sung/Jeong Woo-yeong/Hwang In-beom, Partey/Baba/Kudus
(Musah can go here)
Tier 4
Eustaquio/Hutchinson, Kamada/Endo/Morita, Amrabat/Barkok, Moder/Bielik/Linetty, Romdhane/Laidouni/Chaalali, Caicedo/Franco/Gruezo, Kanno/Al-Najei/Al-Faraj, Ramsey/Allen, Mooy/Hrustic/Irvine
(Yunus Musah, Kellyn Acosta, and Luca de La Torre go here with Busio, Roldan, and Duane Holmes being interchangeable with all three)
Tier 5
Nourollahi/Ezatolahi, Oum Gouet/Onana, Borges/Tejeda
(Eryk Williamson, Alan Sonora, and Paxton Pomykal go here with everyone else)
Notes
-> Belgium, Uruguay, Cameroon, and Iran generally use an extra forward at the expense of a third midfielder. Canada has made substantial use of both two striker and one striker set-ups, but to keep the quartet of David, Davies, Larin, and Buchanan on the field. i’m choosing a two striker set-up at the expense of a third mid.
-> Denmark has 10 players on teams set to play in the 22-23 UEFA Champions league. Of those 10, 4 are first-choice starters and of those starters, 2 play for a club in the “big 4” leagues. One of these 2 is Tottenham midfielder Pierre-Emile Højbjerg. Unlike many of his countrymen plying their trade at higher levels, Hojbjerg hasn’t struggled for minutes, playing literally every minute for a Tottenham side that has started 2022-2023 undefeated. Additionally, Christian Eriksen has performed well since brushing with death at the Euros. Upon his arrival in 21-22, Brentford experienced an immediate uptick in form, going 7-3-1(W-L-T) with Eriksen on the field(they had a record of 5-15-6 without him). His heroics at West London earned him a move to the red part of Manchester where Eriksen has played 98% of available minutes for Manchester United. Combined, the improvement in play/team form for Hojberg and the successful return of Eriksen as a professional player elevates Denmark’s midfield from Tier 3 to Tier 2.
-> Morocco, Costa Rica, Wales, and Denmark lose a third midfielder in exchange for an extra center back. While Costa Rica has made substantial use of both two center back and three center back set-ups(alternating between an extra striker or an extra defender), they tended to use three center backs when facing more talented opposition. Since Costa Rica is less talented than their three group stage opponents, I’ve decided to go with the extra defender.
-> Wales’s World Cup squad is likely to feature the most lower division players, including Swansea City midfielder Joe Allen. His partner-in-crime is former Arsenal player Aaron Ramsey who’s presently struggling for starts at Nice; currently winless in Ligue 1. Wales are currently the second highest ranked team with a Tier 4 midfield per Elo(22), and the highest ranked team with a Tier 4 midfield per Fifa(19). Strategy can minimize weaknesses; by focusing on direct attacks and dropping their lines under pressure, Wales are able to shift the game towards their Tier 3 attacker and their Tier 3 defenders. Consequently, Wales have been able to make do with a relatively weak midfield corps.
Centerbacks
Tier 1:
Marquinhos/Silva, Verane/Kimpembe, Laporte/Torres, Diaz/Pereia, VVD/De Ligt, Rudiger/Sule
Tier 2:
Romero/Otamendi, Stones/Maguire, Christensen/Andersen/Kjaer, Koulibaly/Diallo
Tier 3:
Akanji/Schar, Alderweireld/Jan Vertonghen/Boyota, Gimenez/Godin, Lovren/Gvardiol, Saiss/Aguerd/Mmaee, Pavlović/Veljković/Milenković, Hincapie/Torres, Djiku/Amartey, Ben Davies/Ampadu/Rodon
(Richards, Ream and Brooks go here)
Tier 4:
Moreno/Araujo, Yoshida/Itakura, Glik/Bednarek, Ngadeu-Ngadjui/Castelletto, Al-Amri/Al-Bulaihi
(Walker Zimmerman and Erick Palmer Brown go here with either being interchangeable with Cameron Carter Vickers, James Sands, Miles Robinson, and Matt Mizaga)
Tier 5:
Kanaanizadegan/Khalilzadeh, Min-jae/Kyung-won, Talbi/Ghandri, Miller/Vitoria, Calvo/Watson/Vargas, Wright/Rowles
(Aaron Long goes here with everyone else)
Notes
-> It might be a surprise for some that John Brooks, who seems to have fallen out of favor with USMNT Coach Gregg Berhalter, is placed a tier ahead of various, recently capped, American center backs. However, this list prioritizes “goodness” over fit(or player-coach relationships), and between multiple seasons of strong play in the Bundesliga, being signed by by a reigning UCL Quarterfinalist, and an arguable “best player on the team” performance during the 2021 Nations League, I’m comfortable putting Brook’s roster snubs down to factors besides how good he is at soccer.
-> The going has been rough for Ecuadorian center back Piero Hincapie and Bayer Leverkusen; losing all but one of their first 5 games with Piero suspended for game 6. Form, however, is not class. Piero was a first choice starter for “The Company’s Eleven” as they made a surprise top 3 finish in the bundesliga last season. The going has been good for fellow Ecuadorian Felix Torres who’s Santos Laguna is currently top 4 in the standings for the Apetura. Together they slot into Tier 3 giving Ecuador 4 starters in roughly average territory. The other 7 have been slotted into tier 4 or 5 which is remarkable considering “La Tri”’s recent competitive performance: Ecuador were 3rd throughout most of CONMEBOL qualifying, only slipping to 4th when they were guaranteed a World Cup spot with games to spare, notched multiple results vs Brazil and Argentina, and are ranked 18th in elo which places them among 15th among teams referenced in this list. A team can be better than the sum of their parts and Ecuador have arguably gotten more out of their players than anyone else.
-> Significantly younger American center back Chris Richards also finds himself in a pickle, with 1 start for Crystal Palace through the beginning of 2022-23. While not the best of looks, context makes this more palatable. Crystal Palace are disproportionately good at the position of center back. While limited elsewhere, their center backs are elite by Premier League standards. Chris Richards locked in a starting spot with Hoffenheim last season as they pushed for Champions League qualification, has a statistically strong profile over multiple years in the Bundesliga, and was deemed valuable enough to Bayern that they set out a minimum fee of 20 million when Chris Richards insisted on a move. Ultimately Richards was too good for Bayern to let him go cheaply, but not good enough(yet) to be more to Bayern, one of the best teams on the planet, than depth. All considered, Richards is probably good at soccer. If things go well(say Richards becomes a starter at Crystal Palace and Brooks kills it with Benfica), 2022-23 might push the Yanks to Tier 2. If things go badly(say Richards stops getting playing time and Brooks is demonstrably out of his depth), they could drop to Tier 4. For now, with the World Cup fast approaching, they’ll have to settle for being middle-of-the-pack.
-> The going has also been rough for Senegalese center backs Kalidou Koulibaly and Abdou Diallo. The former has seen his team(Chelsea) sputter out of the gates while the latter has yet to see a single minute of action. Nonetheless, form isn’t class, and both centerbacks got significant minutes last season for two of the best teams on the planet. Even with 22-23 starting sub-optimally, it’s hard to put Senegal’s duo lower than Tier 2. This leaves all of Senegal’s starters, save for Tier 3 striker Boulaye Dia, at Tier 2 with certain individuals, like Mane, being worthy of Tier 1. With 1 player in average territory and the rest ranging from good to world-class, Senegal’s recent competitive performance is remarkably…disappointing. With losses to sides like Egypt and Zambia, and a plethora of non-wins against sides like Togo, Guinea, and Malawi, Senegal are ranked 47th according to Elo, which puts them 28th among teams on this list. A team can be less than the sum of their parts and Senegal have arguably gotten less out of their talent than anyone else.
You may like
USMNT
Ranking the Most Impactful USMNT Players in World Cup History
Published
2 weeks agoon
June 13, 2026Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
The U.S. Men’s National Team has played 37 World Cup matches across ten tournaments, producing no shortage of memorable moments and standout performances. Below is my ranking of USMNT players based on their World Cup impact, some from a single tournament, others across multiple appearances.
I’ve taken a few liberties with ties, as in several cases no single player clearly stood above the rest; instead, the moment itself, and the collective effort, defined the performance.
Honorable Mention:
Marcelo Balboa – Appearing in three consecutive World Cups (1990, 1994, and 1998), he anchored the USMNT defense throughout an important era of growth for the program. He also came close to one of the tournament’s most memorable moments with a spectacular bicycle kick attempt off a corner against Colombia that nearly found the net.
Michael Bradley – Across three World Cups (2006, 2010, and 2014), Michael Bradley was a driving force in the USMNT midfield, known for his engine, composure, and leadership. He delivered a crucial game-tying goal against Slovenia in 2010 and later provided the assist on Julian Green’s memorable strike in 2014, consistently stepping up in key moments on the world stage.
Cobi Jones – While Cobi Jones remains the all-time leader in USMNT caps and earned 11 World Cup appearances across three consecutive tournaments, he did not register any goal contribution in any of those World Cups.
Eddie Pope – Across three World Cups (1998, 2002, and 2006), Eddie Pope was a cornerstone of the USMNT backline, known for his composure, positioning, and aerial dominance. He played a vital role in the team’s run to the quarterfinals in 2002, anchoring a disciplined defense and providing veteran leadership against some of the world’s top attacking talent.
Matt Turner – If Turner earns the starting role and delivers a standout performance during a deep USMNT run, coming up with game-changing saves, he could break into the top 10 while surpassing the current records for wins and shutouts.
#10 – 1930 USMNT Pioneers-TIED
Jimmy Douglas
World Cups: 1 (1930)
Matches: 3
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 2
Bert Patenaude
World Cups: 1 (1930)
Matches: 3
Goals: 4
Assists: 2
With limited historical data and in the context of the very first FIFA World Cup, I’m combining two true pioneers of the USMNT. Jimmy Douglas remains the only USMNT goalkeeper to record two wins and two shutouts in World Cup play, all achieved at the inaugural 1930 tournament, where the United States secured a third-place finish.
On the attacking side, Bert Patenaude scored four goals in that same tournament, including a hat trick in the U.S. second and final group-stage match. His performances were instrumental in helping guide the United States to its third-place finish in the first-ever FIFA World Cup.
#9 – 1950 USMNT Heros-TIED
Frank Borghi
World Cups: 1 (1950)
Matches: 3
Wins: 1
Shutouts: 1
Joe Gaetjens
World Cups: 1 (1950)
Matches: 3
Goals: 1
Assists: 0
Another historic meeting, shaped by similar circumstances to the first group, but what is known for certain is that the USMNT pulled off a stunning victory over one of the top sides at the 1950 World Cup. Frank Borghi delivered a remarkable performance in goal throughout the match, standing firm under relentless pressure.
The breakthrough came in the 38th minute when Joe Gaetjens scored a crucial goal to give the USMNT the lead. From there, the match shifted entirely onto the shoulders of the U.S. defense and goalkeeping, who held strong to secure a famous 1–0 victory over England one of the greatest upsets in World Cup history.
Earnie Stewart
World Cups: 3 (1994, 1998, 2002)
Matches: 11
Goals: 1
Assists: 0
#8 – 1994 USMNT Trailblazers-TIED
Eric Wynalda
World Cups: 3 (1990, 1994, 1998)
Matches: 8
Goals: 1
Assists: 0
Two of the USMNT’s early trailblazers, Eric Wynalda and Earnie Stewart, delivered defining World Cup moments on home soil at the 1994 FIFA World Cup. Both played pivotal roles in energizing a new generation of American soccer fans.
The USMNT’s first goal of that tournament came via one of the most iconic set pieces in World Cup history, earning a crucial draw in the opener. That momentum carried forward when Stewart netted the game-winner against heavily favored Colombia, securing the United States’ first World Cup victory since 1950.
.
#7 – Claudio Reyna
World Cups: 4 (1994, 1998, 2002, 2006)
Matches: 10
Goals: 0
Assists: 0
Named to four World Cup squads and appearing in three, Claudio Reyna was a cornerstone of the USMNT for more than a decade. While he didn’t record a goal contribution on the World Cup stage, his influence was undeniable, dictating tempo, providing composure in midfield, and serving as captain in both the 2002 and 2006 tournaments.
#6 – DaMarcus Beasley
World Cups: 4 (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 11
Goals: 0
Assists: 1
DaMarcus Beasley is the only USMNT player to appear in four World Cups (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014), a testament to his remarkable longevity, versatility, and consistent impact across multiple generations.
He emerged on the global stage at the 2002 World Cup as an explosive, attack-minded winger, using his pace and direct play to stretch defenses and play a key role in the United States’ run to the quarterfinals. As his career progressed, Beasley reinvented himself, most notably transitioning to left back by the 2014 World Cup, where his experience, defensive discipline, and composure helped stabilize the back line against elite international competition.
#5 – Brad Friedel
World Cups: 3 (1994, 1998, 2002)
Matches: 6
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 1
Brad Friedel’s World Cup legacy is defined by consistency, composure, and elite shot-stopping across multiple tournaments. He served as the primary starter at the 2002 World Cup, made a start at the 1998 World Cup, and was the backup to Tony Meola in 1994, providing a steady, reliable presence in goal during a pivotal era for the USMNT.
His standout performances came in 2002, highlighted by his penalty-saving heroics. Friedel recorded two penalty saves in the tournament (excluding shootouts), tying the World Cup record for most in a single edition. His ability to deliver in high-pressure moments played a key role in the United States’ run to the quarterfinals and solidified his place among the program’s all-time great goalkeepers.
#4 – Brian McBride
World Cups: 3 (1998, 2002, 2006)
Matches: 10
Goals: 3
Assists: 1
Brian McBride’s World Cup legacy is defined by big goals, relentless work rate, and a fearless, physical style that helped set the tone for the USMNT on the global stage. He scored the team’s only goal at the 1998 World Cup against Iran, rising to meet a corner kick with authority.
In 2002, he played a pivotal role in the opening-match upset of Portugal, constantly pressuring the defense and helping spark the historic win, before delivering again with a goal against Mexico in the Round of 16 to send the US. to the quarterfinals.
His grit and determination were on full display in his final World Cup in 2006, when he famously continued playing after suffering a broken nose and a bloodied face, an enduring symbol of his toughness, leadership, and commitment to the team.
#3 – Tim Howard
World Cups: 3 (2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 8
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 1
A starter in back-to-back World Cups, Tim Howard delivered on the biggest stage when it mattered most. From his record-setting 16-save performance against Belgium at the 2014 World Cup, widely regarded as one of the greatest goalkeeping displays in World Cup history, to his consistent ability to keep the United States competitive against elite opposition, he repeatedly elevated his game under pressure.
His shot-stopping brilliance, commanding presence, and calm leadership in high-intensity moments define a legacy that places him among the most influential goalkeepers the USMNT has ever had on the World Cup stage.
#2 – Clint Dempsey
World Cups: 3 (2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 10
Goals: 4
Assists: 0
From his goal just 29 seconds into the match against Ghana at the 2014 World Cup, the fastest in USMNT World Cup history, to his composed finish against England in 2010 World Cup that helped secure a crucial draw, to becoming the first American to score in three different World Cups, Clint Dempsey consistently delivered on the game’s biggest stage.
Those moments, combined with his toughness, edge, and ability to show up in key situations, cement his place as one of the most impactful USMNT players in World Cup history.
#1 – Landon Donovan
World Cups: 3 (2002, 2006, 2010)
Matches: 12
Goals: 5
Assists: 3
From his dramatic stoppage-time winner against Algeria that sent the USMNT into the knockout stage, to his goal in the “Dos a Cero” victory over Mexico that helped propel the team to the quarterfinals, to his deflected strike off Jorge Costa that contributed to him being named Best Young Player of the 2002 World Cup, Landon Donovan consistently delivered on the biggest stage.
Taken together, those moments make a strong case that he’s been the most impactful USMNT player in World Cup history, and it only adds to the “what if” of how much more he might have achieved had he been part of the 2014 squad.
USMNT
The Return of Third-Place Qualifiers at the FIFA World Cup
Published
2 weeks agoon
June 13, 2026Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
The expansion of the 2026 FIFA World Cup from 32 to 48 teams will dramatically change the race to reach the knockout stage. Under FIFA’s new format, the top eight third-place teams will advance to the Round of 32 alongside the top two teams from each group.
For the past seven World Cups, only the top two teams in each group have advanced to the knockout stage. The last time third-place teams moved on was at the 1994 World Cup, where the USMNT benefited from the format before losing to eventual champions Brazil in the Round of 16.
So how many points will teams need to advance in 2026?
History suggests that five points should safely secure a place in the knockout stage. Across the past seven World Cups, every team with five or more points advanced out of the group stage.
Three points, however, has almost never been enough. The only team to advance with just three points during that span was Chile at the 1998 World Cup.
Four points has produced mixed results. At the 2022 World Cup, three groups featured two teams finishing on four points, but only one team from each of those situations advanced. Similar scenarios also occurred at the 2010 and 2002 World Cups.
Overall, 46 teams have finished the group stage with four points since 1994, but only 20 advanced to the knockout stage. The USMNT accounts for three of those successful four-point campaigns, advancing in 1994, 2002, and 2014.
1986 World Cup
Semi-Finals Match between Belgium and Argentina
The 1986 World Cup was the first tournament with 24 teams to allow four third-place group stage teams to advance to the knockout round. While the 1982 World Cup also featured 24 teams, it used a different format with a second round made up of four groups of three teams, with only the group winners advancing to the semi-finals.
One of the most notable aspects of the 1986 World Cup was that two teams advanced to the knockout stage with just two points, something that seems highly unlikely under the format for the 2026 World Cup.
Among the third-place qualifiers, Belgium made the deepest run, reaching the semi-finals before losing to eventual champions Argentina.
1990 World Cup
World Cup Final Argentina against Germany
At the 1990 World Cup, every third-place team that advanced to the knockout stage finished with three points. The biggest surprise was Argentina, the highest-ranked third-place team, making an incredible run all the way to the World Cup Final before falling 1-0 to Germany.
1994 World Cup
The 1994 World Cup was arguably the most fascinating tournament when it came to the impact of third-place teams advancing to the knockout stage and likely played a major role in FIFA’s decision to expand the tournament to 32 teams in 1998.
Here’s a look at the top five FIFA World Cup group stage tiebreakers, which will almost certainly come into play this summer, especially when it comes to ranking the third-place teams.
- Overall Goal Difference: The greatest goal difference in all group matches.
- Overall Goals Scored: The greatest number of goals scored in all group matches.
- Head-to-Head Points: The greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned.
- Head-to-Head Goal Difference: Superior goal difference in the group matches between the teams concerned.
- Head-to-Head Goals Scored: The greatest number of goals scored in the group matches between the teams concerned.
Both Group D and Group F saw three teams finish with six points, something that has not happened at the FIFA World Cup since. That created dramatic tiebreaker scenarios that ultimately determined where all six teams finished in their groups. Of those six teams, only two reached the quarterfinals, with Bulgaria making the deepest run by reaching the semi-finals.
Group E may have been the most fascinating group of the 1994 World Cup. Mexico, Ireland, Italy, and Norway all finished with four points and an identical goal differential of zero. Norway was eliminated after scoring just one goal, the fewest in the group.
Italy, meanwhile, advanced as a third-place team and went all the way to the World Cup Final before losing to Brazil in a penalty shootout, an incredible run considering how close they came to being eliminated in the group stage.
Will the 2026 World Cup Deliver Another Chaotic Group Stage?
With the World Cup expanding to 48 teams, the traditional “group of death” may not carry the same weight at the 2026 tournament. Still, that doesn’t mean the group stage will lack drama. Fans will be hoping for the kind of chaotic and unpredictable scenarios that made the 1994 World Cup so memorable, where final group matches carried massive stakes and teams were fighting for survival until the final whistle.
From an entertainment perspective, more meaningful matches late in the group stage would be a huge boost for the tournament, but only time will tell if the expanded format can truly deliver that same level of tension and excitement.
USMNT
The USMNT’s World Cup Legacy: Highs, Lows, and Defining Moments
Published
3 weeks agoon
June 3, 2026Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on Xhttps://x.com/uskeeper/ and us_keeper on Instagram)
The USMNT’s World Cup story stretches back nearly a century to the inaugural tournament in 1930. The 2026 FIFA World Cup will mark the United States’ 12th appearance on soccer’s biggest stage.
Over that time, the Americans have played 37 matches, earning 9 wins, 8 draws, and 20 losses, while scoring 40 goals and conceding 66. The U.S. has advanced to the knockout stage in seven of those tournaments.
Five different USMNT goalkeepers have recorded clean sheets at the World Cup, Matt Turner and Frank Borghi with two each, and Tim Howard, Brad Friedel, and Jimmy Douglas with one apiece.
The USMNT’s top World Cup scorers, Clint Dempsey, Landon Donovan, Brian McBride, and Bert Patenaude, all netted multiple goals in a single tournament, cementing their places in U.S. soccer history.
1930 – Uruguay
The inaugural World Cup in Uruguay saw the USMNT surprise the world by reaching the semifinals before falling 6–1 to Argentina. The U.S. dominated the group stage, defeating Belgium and Paraguay 3–0, with Bert Patenaude making history as the first player ever to record a hat trick at a World Cup. The Americans ultimately finished third, still their best result on the world stage to this day.
1934 – Italy
The USMNT’s 1934 World Cup appearance would be a brief one. Just days before the tournament began, the Americans secured qualification by defeating rivals Mexico 4–2 in Rome. Drawn straight into a knockout format, the U.S. faced host nation Italy in their opening match, falling 7–1. Aldo Donelli scored the team’s only goal, following up his remarkable four-goal performance from the qualifier.
1950 – Brazil
The USMNT pulled off arguably the greatest upset in World Cup history, and certainly their biggest win to date, by defeating England 1–0, thanks to Joe Gaetjens’ famous goal. Despite that historic triumph, the Americans fell 3–1 to Spain in their opener and 5–2 to Chile in their final group match, ending their tournament at the group stage.
1990 – Italy
After a forty-year absence, the USMNT returned to the World Cup with a young, hungry, and largely untested squad. Despite a rough start, suffering a 5–1 loss to Czechoslovakia, the Americans rebounded with a hard-fought 1–0 victory over host and eventual third-place finisher Italy before narrowly falling 2–1 to Austria. The invaluable experience gained at this tournament would help lay the foundation for the team’s performance at the 1994 World Cup.
1994 – United States
After several attempts to host a World Cup, the United States was finally awarded the 1994 tournament. The USMNT faced a very tough group but showed determination in all three matches. They opened with a 1–1 draw against Switzerland, with Eric Wynalda scoring a brilliant set-piece goal, still considered one of the best in World Cup history. In their second match, the Americans secured a 2–1 victory over a strong Colombian side, marking their first World Cup win since 1950. A narrow 1–0 loss to Romania in the final group match didn’t stop the U.S. from advancing to the Round of 16, where they were eliminated 1-0 by eventual champions Brazil. The 1994 World Cup had a lasting impact, helping to inspire and shape soccer culture in the United States.
1998 – France
It was an up-and-down cycle for the USMNT, but their fourth-place finish at the 1995 Copa América had fans optimistic about the team’s potential heading into 1998. However, the shocking omission of longtime captain John Harkes, who had worn the armband 30 times, raised serious questions. Meanwhile, trailblazers from earlier cycles struggled to make an impact: Alexi Lalas didn’t play a single minute, Marcelo Balboa saw just eight minutes of action, and Eric Wynalda featured in only two matches for a total of 51 minutes. The Americans went on to lose all three group-stage games, finishing last among the 32 teams.
2002 – Korea / Japan
After a hard-fought qualifying campaign, the USMNT made a memorable run at the 2002 World Cup, advancing to the quarterfinals after a historic 2–0 win over regional rivals Mexico. The Americans put in a strong performance against Germany but were denied a potential equalizer when a clear handball went uncalled, ending their dream run with a narrow defeat. Landon Donovan’s breakout performance earned him the tournament’s Best Young Player award.
2006 – Germany
The USMNT entered the 2006 World Cup brimming with confidence, dreaming of another deep run. But drawn into a brutal Group of Death, those hopes quickly unraveled. A 3–0 loss to the Czech Republic stunned the team, though a fierce 1–1 draw with Italy briefly reignited belief. Then came heartbreak, a controversial penalty on Oguchi Onyewu doomed the US to a 2–1 defeat to Ghana and a shocking early exit.
2010 – South Africa
Riding the momentum of their 2009 Confederations Cup runner-up finish, the USMNT entered the 2010 World Cup with real belief and growing hype. Every match in South Africa was a test of grit and heart. The opener against England ended 1–1, with Clint Dempsey’s late first-half strike shocking the favorites. In their second match, the Americans stormed back from two goals down to draw 2–2, keeping their hopes alive. Then came one of the most iconic moments in U.S. soccer history, Landon Donovan’s stoppage-time winner against Algeria, sealing a dramatic 1–0 victory and a place in the knockout stage. But the dream ended in heartbreak, as Ghana once again eliminated the U.S. in extra time, 2–1.
2014 – Brazil
The mood heading into the 2014 World Cup was cautious after Jurgen Klinsmann’s shocking decision to leave Landon Donovan, the team’s all-time leader in goals and assists, off the roster. The USMNT opened against familiar nemesis Ghana, who had eliminated them in the previous two tournaments. This time, redemption arrived when substitute John Brooks headed home a late winner to seal a thrilling 2–1 victory. In their second match against powerhouse Portugal, the Americans came within seconds of back-to-back wins before a last-gasp equalizer from Silvestre Varela snatched away the dream. A 1–0 loss to Germany in the final group game proved enough to advance on goal difference. In the Round of 16, the U.S. faced Belgium’s golden generation, pushing the match into extra time behind Tim Howard’s record-breaking 16 saves, but ultimately fell 2–1 in a valiant defeat that earned global respect.
2018 – Russia
An aging and uninspired USMNT failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, marking one of the darkest moments in American soccer history. Bruce Arena later suggested that, had the U.S. made it, the roster would have looked much younger and more dynamic. Still, it’s hard to imagine that group advancing past the group stage, unless teenage sensation Christian Pulisic had delivered a breakout performance on par with Landon Donovan’s heroics in 2002.
2022 – Qatar
A new generation of USMNT players brought back the energy and passion missing in recent cycles. After a turbulent qualifying journey, the Americans opened the World Cup with a 1–1 draw against Wales, Tim Weah’s first-half goal canceled out by Gareth Bale’s late penalty. A gritty 0–0 result against England kept hopes alive before Christian Pulisic’s heroic goal against Iran sent them to the knockouts. Out of gas in the Round of 16, the U.S. fell 3–1 to a superior Netherlands side.
2026 – United States / Mexico / Canada
One thing is certain; the 2026 FIFA World Cup will be unlike anything the world has ever seen. It’s destined to break records, captivate audiences, and redefine what soccer means in America. But the story still to be written is that of the USMNT. Can they rise to the moment, ignite a nation, and make a historic run on home soil, proving once and for all that soccer in the United States has arrived and is here to stay?
Ranking the Most Impactful USMNT Players in World Cup History
The Return of Third-Place Qualifiers at the FIFA World Cup
The USMNT’s World Cup Legacy: Highs, Lows, and Defining Moments
Trending
- Club News6 years ago
CJ dos Santos, Benfica
- Club News2 years ago
American Transfers: Stock Up & Stock Down
- Club News6 years ago
Give: Support Chasing a Cup by Supporting our Cause
- Club News6 years ago
Julian Vincente Araujo
- USMNT2 years ago
USMNT Kits Come in Different Styles and Colors
- USMNT2 years ago
Gregg Berhalter’s Legacy
- USMNT2 years ago
Medals on their Minds
- USMNT6 years ago
A Hidden Gem: Barça Residency Academy