Connect with us
Tyler Adams USMNT 6 Tyler Adams USMNT 6

USMNT

Positional Play Scholar – The most important Role for the USMNT Future: Regista Part II the “Modern 6”

Published

on

A year ago, I wrote a blog post saying the Regista would be the most important role for the USMNT future.  I said this for several reasons. First, it’s a key role in a possession heavy system and in positional play.  Second, the US has not done a good job historically in developing this role as it is built today.  Third, the US is very thin in terms of elite prospects for this role. All of these things are still true. The role isn’t near as thin as it was but is still one of the thinnest we’ve seen. 

Modern 6

First let’s define what I mean by the Regista. These terms are more fluid than most would like (including myself). They are used by analysts to describe a specific role of a player in a particular point in time. Then that role evolves and lots of different analysts, media, and fans all try to use it. The result is a lot of people with different ideas about what it means.  

These days I often refer to it as the “Modern 6.”  It can also be called the deep lying maker or defensive midfielder.  I know there are people screaming into their computers right now that all of these are different. I know.  So we’ll start by defining what I call the Modern 6 instead of only using any of these terms. 

The Modern 6 is a midfielder that plays at the base the midfield and/or at the peak of the defense.   In a 4 back system, when the fullbacks get high and wide, it will sometimes drop into the back line to help form a back 3.  As a general rule, the team with the ball will want to keep +1 in their own half. Meaning they will want to keep one more player than the opposing team.   So if the opposing  team presses with 2 against 2 cb’s the 6 will drop back either centrally or on the edges to keep a numbers advantage.

You can usually identify this role by a few obvious traits 

Positional Discipline

First, he stays pretty tightly tethered to the back. The last thing a defense wants are flat lines where a creative player can create through balls to runners in behind or drive at cbs with space. The attacker has advantage with momentum and timing. The defenders often have to rely on an offside trap to stop penetrating balls or try to make tackles that (if missed) lead to run ins on goal.  They would prefer to keep someone always in front of them to not allow that pass or direct line to the cb.  They also want to keep a +1 in the back and the 6 is there to help do that. This is why normally the 6 doesn’t press very much. Their job is to contain an attack, prevent the penetrating dribble or pass and shield the back.  What you’ll normally see them do is pick their spots when they are confident they can win the ball and otherwise let the 8’s and wings press heavily.  

The role of the 6 used to be that of a destroyer.  Soccer tactics went through a period of teams consistency putting a creative 10 in the middle of the field to camp out in zones 14 of the opponents half.

They would create goals by being creative on the ball in the most dangerous spots.  Teams adapted to this by putting tackle/defensive experts in that same spot to mark out these 10’s.  That shifted tactics to move to having 2 10’s in the half spaces between zones 15/14 and 13/14. This negates the ability of a destroyer to mark out a 10 or camp out and eliminate creative attacks in one zone. As a team passes around, the defense has to move to cover passing lanes.  This opens up opportunities even in a low block. 

That shift away from needing a central, destroying 6 has increased more due to teams defending less in low blocks and focusing more on pressing. It moves the lines of confrontation up the field. This has mostly seen a sharp reduction of pure destroyer style midfielders from good teams.  They don’t need an aggressive tackle expert to camp out in zone 14.  You still want tacklers but now due to defending the whole field and due to most teams using dual 10’s in the halfspace- teams want rangy 8’s.  That’s why you don’t see Kante playing a lot as a one 6 anymore and its one reason the US sought out Musah.  With Mckennie and musah as the rangy 8’s, the 6 can act as “clean up.”  Some teams can still use the 10 in zone 14 and any team will find itself defending in the low block at times, so you do want a little destroyer in your 6 but that trait is a lot less important than it used to be and not as prioritized.  

That’s not to say athleticism isn’t needed in the new modern 6 role. It absolutely is and is why Bradley seems to be phased out of the US program.  The rangier the modern 6, the larger space he can clean up and cover and still be that central zones that he needs to be at the right times. 

But most importantly, a very rangy 6 is hard to get passed.  Where Bradley, Trapp and some extent Yueill most hurt the team defensively is opposing teams could dribble around them too easily.  The point of keeping a 6 tethered to the back line is to limit penetration.  A good 6 will do this by being VERY good at timing his tackles and will most often not even attempt a tackle. They will contain the attacker until they get help from an 8.  The athleticism preferred here becomes one around agility rather than strength, size, and aggression. 

High Technical Quality

Second, the other place where athleticism is desired in the modern 6 is for ball control.   A team wants that 6 to be a lock box in possession that is press resistant.  Most teams counter press these days meaning, as soon as they lose the ball, they are coming at you strong.  A really good modern 6 can provide a passing option as an outlet. They can avoid the aggressive counter press. If they are really good, then start the counter with a timely pass or dribble (preferably pass bc dribbling pulls them out of position).   

Busquets technical quality is an example

Rodri is another

Regista

Third, this modern 6 will usually have the high passing percentages of a cb. They move constantly in the zones in front of the cb’s to provide passing options to both the cb’s under pressure and is usually a safe option for the rest of team to maintain possession.  The CB’s (or 6) can make a wide pass or line splitting pass and always have the 6 there for safety and reset if the attack option isn’t on.  This is where they get the Regista part of the game. They dictate the rhythm of the passing. They speed it up or slow it down. That brings us to a fourth trait. 

QB Role

Fourth, they are often the “qb” of the offense. You’ll normally see the modern 6 directing traffic. This means they need a high game IQ and it’s why you don’t usually see younger guys playing that role. You want experienced players that can read the game and direct traffic. As we saw against Bradley and in the Olympics, the 6 can be marked out. If the opponents decide not to press the CB’s, they’ll often try to mark out the 6, as he’s a key cog in the possession build up and is usually a distributor that penetrates lines. The 6 then needs to be good at reading the game and manipulating the defense with his movement to create passing lanes for the cbs. 

Busquets high game IQ and passing ability 

Distribution

Lastly, if the CB’s can do their job and create penetration with the ball at their feet or with their passing, the modern 6 does what you really want them to do-  Pass the ball.  One of the most important roles of the modern 6 is a distributor.  Short passing range is necessary for the Regista duties but you also want this role to be your deep lying playmaker.  You want them to make line breaking passes and switches to space.  When Bradley or Yueill were/are in as the modern 6, you saw these things a lot.  Bradley in particular was good at hitting the long diagonal. 

I’ve heard people say that’s over rated but I disagree. The US and most top teams use positional play.  Positional Play is a method and/or set of principles of possession play that came out of the Dutch style that Pep has perfected. Most teams that intend or expect to have a great deal of possession embrace positional Play principles. They may go about those principles differently but they embrace the concepts. The term positional play comes from chess and is about getting maximal advantages of players/ pieces positions on the board/field.  At the core of great possession play is maximizing the use of space on the field. Positional Play soccer does that with their positions, movement and coordination.  

Because of the importance positioning, movement and the coordination or timing of those, a deep lying maker is key and the diagonal is key. The deep lying playmaker sits at the base of the midfield.  As a team overloads one side and pulls the defenders to their side to stop numbers or quality mismatches, the team wants to use a positional advantage and space on the back side.  Bradley hit that ball like a QB throwing a deep pass. For all his and Trapps’s faults, they were excellent at that.

Back door diagonal 

The other part of being a deep-lying playmaker is the line breaking pass.  Adams is quite good at this. 

Adams as a deep lying playmaker 

It again uses the positions of the other players and movements to create gaps in space between the lines. Then uses the modern 6 at the base of the midfield to read that opening. The modern 6 has to coordinate the movement and pace of the ball (regista) and time the ball movement to hit that gaps in between the defenders to hit attackers. This is an underrated skills because its usually the pass before the assist. Most fans will see the assist and miss that pass.  It’s crucial to breaking down packed defenses. It’s not just the technical ability to hit the pass but it’s the high game iq to read the game, control the pace and timing of the passes in the back to hit the opening with it occurs.   It’s truly the QB position of soccer.  It’s why it’s my favorite role to watch tactically and why I see it as so crucial to the US future. 

That is what a team wants with the modern 6.  The truth is teams never have everything they want and have to adapt to what they have. That could mean a variety of things.  If Adams lacks passing range, then they could lean more on McKennie. If they are using a guy like Yueill, then they’ll have to cover for his lack of athleticism with 3 cbs and one stepping quickly or an 8 playing a little deeper.  With Adams or Acosta who like to drive forward with the ball more, they’ll adapt with the 8’s slotting back more and covering that space until he returns.  There are lots of tactical nuances once you start fitting in personnel with their own strengths and weaknesses.   RB Leipzig seems to do an interesting thing by inverting a wingback at times and then let him play with some of those roles. The variations are endless with different personnel and against different opponents.  

When I talk about a “Modern 6” that’s what I am talking about. Can a team play positional play or be good at possession without one? They have to have those traits on the field and they will work to have them some where- whether its elsewhere in the mid or cbs.   As a matter of developing a team though-  I personally think any team embracing positional play will attempt to find and use this role. 

Modern 6 Summary

To summarize this role needs

  1. Strong positional discipline 
  2. High technical quality 
  3. Press resistant 
  4. High Game IQ
  5. Deep play making ability (technical ability, vision, outside shooting, and tactical acumen) 
  6. Range; Recovery 
  7. 1:1 defensive ability 
    1. Agility
    2. Impeccable timing on their risk taking 
    3. Aggressive, confident tackling 

US Program 

When looking at the USMNT- what I see is a team extremely thin at this role. As a soccer nation who only recently started prioritizing technical development over athleticism, we have too few of these.  Our primary source of talent is the MLS pipeline.  We are just now seeing them start to play to level that is developing these.  

In my opinion, the US program is doing all it can to find these players and try to get them to a higher level. It’s the one role, where we only have 1 player even in the pipeline at a top club.  Tyler Adams.  Wing, striker, CB, GK, 8’s we have our top tier talent and we have young guys pushing behind them.  Aside from maybe passing, ball dominant cb’s, there is no spot that’s weaker in terms of talent at top leagues. 

It’s also not a role where I think international scouts think to look at the MLS for.  Currently our internal prospects that are getting scouted are pressing cms and athletic, dynamic full backs.  This modern 6 is a highly technical and high game IQ position. I don’t think the US has the rep or “branding yet” that we can develop those.  

So a year later, who do we have in the pipeline?  These are the ones I’m seeing (no particular order). Adams, Yueill, Perea, Johnny, and now Acosta.   There are guys like Kitchen, Sands, and Parks that don’t seem to either fully fit the profile or have been unable to make enough of a dent in the US program for me to know them well. Only Adams and Yueill have we seen do these at a higher level.  

I personally think the US have done three things to try and fill this role. First, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that both Perea and Johnny are dual nationals who have recently committed to the US.  I think the US is targeting weak spots in their depth chart.  Second, they just called and tried to simultaneously start 3 6’s in the Olympics.  The jury is still out if that showcased them enough to put them on any clubs radar.  I think the hope was for them to do well, get scouted and get them into better clubs.  Lastly, they are scouring our current pool for those who might have the technical abilities if not the experience. 

Current Modern 6 Options

This is how I would rate latest 5 on the criteria mentioned. Understand these are highly subjective and only Adams is proven at a high level. These may be a bit unfair to Perea and Cardoso as I haven’t really seen them enough to feel firm in these ratings. 

Adams is our 6 right now.  I still think he needs to develop more regarding his deep lying playmaker abilities. I also think his range and tackling ability could be used further up field as a wingback that inverts, as he does for his club.  But for now- he’s our only prospect playing a 6 (yes a modern 6) at a high level.  Until he develops his passing ability more, I expect the US to rely on Mckennie dropping a bit deeper (who has great distribution skills and now a better tactical sense on when to use it) and to maximize the use of passing CBS in Brooks and Richards.   Adams brings to the role most of you what at a very high level. 

I think this next year we want to continue to watch who could develop into this role and realize, that players may be one role in the MLS and another with the US.  The two that I would keep an eye on are Busio and Pomykal.  Both are talents that Berhalter may start to bring into the national team soon.  Others that I think we should keep an eye on are Alex Mendez & Bryang Kayo. 

Despite the failure to qualify for the Olympics, the future of the US soccer program is bright. The national team is fun to watch and as a nation we’re starting to develop more refined tastes and understanding of the beautiful game. There are lots of key markers to watch. The most important is qualifying and doing well in the World Cup.  For me, who loves the tactical side of the game and seeing highly skillful soccer, I’m watching to see how we find and produce talent at this key role.  I think the US program sees it as a priority and before long we’ll see as many promising modern 6 prospects as we do 8’s and 10’s.   I look forward to it. 

Continue Reading

USMNT

Side by Side: The Looking at USMNT Center Back Pairings – Past & Present

Published

on

If the March 2026 window revealed anything about the United States men’s national soccer team, it’s that their center-back group, whether in a two- or three-man setup, lacks cohesion heading into the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The partnership, continuity, and communication between center backs are critical to organizing the entire defense, and right now, that foundation doesn’t look fully settled.

That realization prompted a look back over the past 40 years, examining the different center-back pairings, how they developed chemistry, and the impact those partnerships had on the USMNT at the highest level.

The Steadfast Anchor of the 1990 USMNT Defense

Mike Windischmann, captain of the 1990 USMNT World Cup team, was a cornerstone of the squad throughout the 1990 cycle. For much of that period, he was paired at center-back with Steve Trittschuh, though the two didn’t start together at the World Cup itself. Windischmann also formed defensive partnerships with John Doyle, Marcelo Balboa, and Paul Caligiuri at various points. At the World Cup, he teamed up with Jimmy Banks in two of the three matches, providing leadership and stability at the heart of the U.S. backline.

Trailblazers Building a Solid Back Line for the Future

Much like the 1990 cycle, Marcelo Balboa was a constant presence on the USMNT back line, whether playing as a sweeper under Bora Milutinović or in a back three with six midfielders in front of him under Steve Sampson. He formed key partnerships with emerging talents like Alexi Lalas, who joined the team in 1992, and dual-national Thomas Dooley. This defensive core enjoyed significant successes throughout the 1994 and 1998 cycles, including advancing out of the group stage at the 1994 World Cup, defeating Argentina at the 1995 Copa América, and taking Brazil to the brink in a hard-fought semifinal.

A Defensive Anchor in U.S. Soccer History

Widely regarded as one of the top center-backs in U.S. men’s national team history, Eddie Pope featured in three consecutive FIFA World Cups (1998, 2002, and 2006), starting in all three for the USMNT. At the 2002 tournament, he anchored a formidable back line alongside Tony Sanneh and Jeff Agoos, forming a disciplined and resilient defensive unit for the United States men’s national soccer team. That group played a key role in one of the program’s deepest modern World Cup runs, but does it stand as the best defensive unit the USMNT has ever produced?

A Peak Partnership Interrupted

For me, one of the strongest center-back pairings in United States men’s national soccer team history emerged during the 2010 cycle, anchored by Carlos Bocanegra and Oguchi Onyewu. The duo arguably reached their peak at the 2009 Confederations Cup, forming a physically dominant and well-organized backbone.

Unfortunately, Onyewu’s injury leading into the 2010 World Cup limited his effectiveness, preventing the partnership from carrying that same level into the tournament. In his absence, Jay DeMerit stepped in seamlessly, providing valuable depth and steady performances, highlighting the overall strength of the USMNT’s center-back pool during that period.

From Breakthrough to Breakdown

The center-back pairing of Omar Gonzalez and Matt Besler came together late in the 2014 cycle but quickly developed into a reliable and cohesive duo at the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Their understanding and physical presence helped stabilize the back line on the world stage.

That tournament also introduced a rising presence in John Brooks, who memorably scored the game-winning goal against Ghana after Besler picked up a knock, announcing himself in a major moment.

As the cycle turned toward 2018, Brooks continued to establish himself, often partnering with Geoff Cameron, while Gonzalez and Besler remained in the mix depending on form and fitness. However, as the 2018 cycle progressed, inconsistency and a lack of cohesion among the center-backs became an issue, one of several factors that ultimately contributed to the United States men’s national soccer team failing to qualify for the 2018 FIFA World Cup.

Emerging Stability Ahead of the 2022 World Cup

Heading into the 2022 FIFA World Cup, the United States men’s national soccer team faced real uncertainty at center back, with no clear anchor or leader emerging. That quickly changed, as Tim Ream stepped in and solidified himself as the steadying presence of the back line.

A major turning point came when Miles Robinson suffered a ruptured Achilles tendon in the summer leading up to the tournament—a significant blow given his form and importance to the group. His absence opened the door for Walker Zimmerman, who had already been in contention, to establish a strong partnership alongside Ream.

Meanwhile, Aaron Long, returning from his own Achilles injury in 2021, earned a place on the roster, and Cameron Carter-Vickers also featured, with both players contributing minutes during the tournament. Together, this group brought stability to a position that had looked unsettled just months earlier.

2026 at Center Back Uncertainty and Opportunity

There are more questions than answers surrounding the United States men’s national soccer team center-back picture heading into the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Chris Richards appears to be a near lock, while Tim Ream, though still a trusted presence, has shown signs of decline compared to four years ago, yet could still find his way onto the roster based on experience and leadership.

A key variable will be how Mauricio Pochettino sets up tactically, particularly whether he opts for a two or three center-back system. In a back three, players like Joe Scally and Alex Freeman could slide into right center-back roles given their versatility, while Mark McKenzie and Auston Trusty provide options on the left. Miles Robinson also remains firmly in the mix as competition for a roster spot.

Perhaps the biggest unknown is Noahkai Banks. The 19-year-old dual national, currently playing in the Bundesliga, opted out of a recent USMNT camp while weighing his international future between the United States and Germany. If he ultimately commits, his emergence could significantly impact the depth and ceiling of the USMNT’s center-back pool heading into 2026.

Continue Reading

USMNT

Voices of USMNT on the World Stage

Published

on

Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)

Over the decades, the United States Men’s National Soccer Team has been accompanied by a wide range of voices behind the microphone, delivering some of the most memorable calls in World Cup history.

Along the way, several standout broadcast duos have helped shape the viewing experience and left a lasting mark on the USMNT landscape.

Here’s a look back at the voices that have defined US World Cup broadcasts since 1990.

1990 FIFA World Cup – Italy 

Network: ESPN

Play-by-play: Bob Ley

Color: Paul Gardner

Coverage of the USMNT at the 1990 World Cup was limited, particularly in the early rounds, but Bob Ley emerged as one of the defining voices of soccer on U.S. television during that era. His presence helped introduce a new generation of American fans to the international game, providing context and credibility at a time when the global stage still felt unfamiliar to much of the US audience.

1994 FIFA World Cup – United States of America

1998 FIFA World Cup – France

2002 FIFA World Cup – Japan / South Korea

Networks: ABC / ESPN

Play-by-play: JP Dellacamera

Color: Ty Keough

This play-by-play and color commentary duo called three World Cups for the USMNT, becoming the defining voice of the team during my peak viewing years. Ty Keough the former USMNT midfielder from the late 1970s and early 1980s.

JP Dellacamera stands out as one of, if not the, best play-by-play announcers and remains one of my favorites. While others on this list delivered memorable moments, they didn’t quite match that same level of longevity.

2006 FIFA World Cup – Germany 

Networks: ABC / ESPN

Play-by-play: Dave O’Brien

Color: Marcelo Balboa

New England native Dave O’Brien, widely known today for calling major sports across his career, had just one World Cup as the primary play-by-play voice for the USMNT. His run calling USMNT matches, primarily in the mid-2000s on ESPN, was relatively brief but still memorable. While he isn’t as closely associated with the USMNT as some other broadcasters, he was behind the mic for several standout moments during that era.

2010 FIFA World Cup – South Korea

Network: ESPN

Play-by-play: Ian Darke

Color: John Harkes

Ian Darke brought a global voice to American audiences as the lead play-by-play announcer for the USMNT during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Already well known around the world, he made the tournament easy to connect with for U.S. fans and delivered one of the most iconic calls in American soccer history.

Darke’s iconic call of the USMNT game winning goal by Landon Donovan in must win final group stage match against Algeria to advance to the knockout stage of the 2010 World Cup gives me chills every time I see it.

2014 FIFA World Cup – Brazil 

Networks: ESPN / ABC

Play-by-play: Ian Darke

Color: Taylor Twellman

This duo might be my favorite to date. Ian Darke brought a clear, global voice to USMNT viewers during the 2014 FIFA World Cup, making the tournament easy to follow for US fans while elevating the biggest moments with calm, sharp, and memorable calls.

Alongside him, Taylor Twellman emerged as one of the most recognizable and influential voices of the modern era, primarily as a lead analyst on ESPN. His passionate, unfiltered style stood out, most notably with his unforgettable “What are we doing?!” reaction following the USMNT’s failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, a moment that’s still talked about today.

2022 FIFA World Cup – Qatar

Network: FOX Sports

Play-by-play: John Strong

Color: Stu Holden

If the USMNT had qualified for the 2018 World Cup, this broadcast team would have called their matches, marking what would have been a third straight World Cup cycle with the same primary commentary crew. It’s also likely he’ll be paired again with Stu Holden for USMNT matches at the 2026 World Cup.

John Strong has served as a lead play-by-play voice for U.S. soccer on FOX Sports since 2018, bringing a modern, high-energy style to the booth. Since taking on major international assignments, he’s become one of the defining voices for USMNT audiences in top competitions, known for his clear, sharp calls and a big-game tone that fits the moment.

Continue Reading

Club News

The Expanding Impact of MLS on the World Cup

Published

on

The growth and success of Major League Soccer has led to more players from around the world representing MLS at the World Cup, with this summer’s tournament expected to feature the highest total yet.

1998 was the first World Cup played after the launch of Major League Soccer. Here’s a breakdown of MLS-based players on World Cup rosters by year:

1998 – 18 (T-8th)
Tied with Liga MX for 8th most. This would the first and only time the USMNT World Cup roster  

2002 – 11 (18th)
All 11 were from the USMNT

2006 – 15 (14th)
11 of the 15 were #USMNT players.

2010 – 6 (25th)
The lowest total to date. Only 6 MLS players, with 4 on the USMNT. This coincided with the peak of US players based in Europe.

2014 – 21 (10th)
Less than half were USMNT players, though the US still led the way the 10 most notably DeAndre Yedlin (20) getting the call.

2018 – 18 (11th)
This number likely would’ve been significantly higher had the USMNT qualified, potentially pushing MLS into the top 7–8 leagues.

2022 – 36 (6th)
The highest total yet, just behind Ligue 1 for 5th. Also worth noting, rosters expanded from 23 to 26 players for this tournament and the first time that the USA didn’t have the most players 

Overall, the trend shows steady growth in MLS representation, both domestically and internationally.

MLS Pipeline Continues for the USMNT

It’s rare for a World Cup–qualified nation not to have a strong share of its players featured across tournament rosters. Canada was a recent exception in 2022, though their ties to MLS remain significant with multiple clubs in the league.

With roster selection less than a month away, it’s reasonable to expect that roughly a third of the #USMNT squad will come from MLS. Below is a positional breakdown of the MLS players Mauricio Pochettino has called in during his tenure as USMNT manager.

Goalkeepers

The USMNT is set to start an MLS-based goalkeeper at a World Cup for the first time, with all of the top options currently playing in MLS.

Chris Brady is one of the goalkeepers I’m most excited to watch in the coming cycles. He’s been performing at a high level in Major League Soccer and looks like a strong candidate to fill the long-term role as the USMNT’s primary starter over the next few cycles.

Chris Brady
Roman Celentano
Matt Freese
Patrick Schulte
Matt Turner

Defenders

Veteran center-backs Tim Ream and Miles Robinson seem likely to be selected with Blackmon a possibility depending on the health of the remaining pool. Arfsten seems to be almost a lock due to his ability to attack and create scoring chances with his crosses from the wing.

Max Arfsten
Tristan Blackmon
Tim Ream
Miles Robinson

Midfielders

The USMNT has strong depth in midfield, and Mauricio Pochettino’s recent roster selections suggest he’ll likely round out the squad with some of the players listed below.

One of the biggest gaps in this USMNT roster is the true dynamic, creative spark in the attacking third. Diego Luna stands out in that role, capable of unsettling defenses, breaking lines, and changing the rhythm of a match. He’s exactly the type of player who could thrive in a super-sub role, coming on against tired legs and making an impact at this summer’s World Cup.

Sebastian Berhalter
Diego Luna
Jack McGlynn
Cristian Roldan
Timothy Tillman

Forwards

Striker may be the toughest position for the MLS group to crack the #USMNT World Cup roster, but Brian White is making a strong case, scoring eight goals in his first nine MLS matches at the time of writing.

Brian White is a highly productive, “old-school” style striker for the USMNT, known for his elite positioning, relentless work rate, and ability to finish in a variety of ways. That combination makes him a strong option as a striker off the bench, where he could be especially dangerous against tired defenses at this summer’s World Cup.

Paxten Aaronson
Josh Sargent
Brian White

MLS Representation in the USMNT Player Pool

Since 1998, the last time the majority of a USMNT World Cup roster was composed primarily of MLS-based players, it has become increasingly clear that a meaningful portion of the squad still comes from MLS. Consistently, roughly 30–40% of the roster has been drawn from the domestic league, reflecting a long-standing and relatively stable trend in player selection over time which I don’t seen changing anytime soon.

Continue Reading

Trending