USMNT
The Curious Case of Gregg Berhalter
Published
4 years agoon
Gregg Berhalter’s contract has expired and we’re unsure of the next move for the manager or the US Men’s National Team. Jurgen Klinsmann and Bruce Arena left little to the imagination when they each lost their position as USMNT managers. They had not been able to qualify for the World Cup in 2018 out of CONCACAF and in Arena’s case not been able to even secure a draw against a lowly Trinidad and Tobago side. Berhalter is a much more interesting position with a network of converging storylines that make for intriguing decisions for both parties.
What did Gregg do and how will he be measured? What does USSF want to knowing they are hosting the World Cup and will have an incredibly talented team to build from for a 2026 run.
Qualifying & Expectations
Gregg was hired at a time when the US had failed to qualify for the world cup out of CONCACAF. After failing to qualify a number of US fan bases and independent media were born and grew out of the frustration of this experience. Scuffed Podcast, Underdog Soccer Podcast, Tactical Manager and 11Yanks are all core mediums that were born of and have grown a tremendous following in the wake of missing 2018.
Alexi Lalas had mentioned early in the process that this was the greatest group of American players assembled and expectations would be high for the new manager. There were trophies earned across the pool, Pulisic had some great moments in HUGE games for Chelsea, Weston McKennie was establishing himself as a key piece for Juventus in Italy, Tyler Adams and Brenden Aaronson at Leeds, a backline duo of Antonee Robinson and Tim Ream at Fulham, Tim Weah in France and Gio Reyna, the wonder kid, at Dortmund, Yunus Musah and Sergiño Dest in Spain (followed by Italy for Dest). The list goes on and on. The argument however, has been – how essential are these players for these key clubs. Are they scoring goals and providing true attacking impact in their roles? Can we produce a striker who can score to finish off goals in this talented pool of supporting attacking players?
The USMNT finished third and qualified for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Ultimately they qualified, but they were dominated by Canada drawing their first match at home and losing to an under manned Canadian team away. Though they defeated Mexico in qualifying, they finished below them in the standings as they were unable to put away some of their weaker opponents. It could have easily gone very differently either way during qualifying. The US should have scored to defeat El Salvador in their opener and looked desperately disorganized against Panama through most of the match before a halftime lineup change and Pepi’s substitution likely changed the course of qualifing and Berhalter’s legacy.
Gregg built a successful defensive side, that allowed very few goals during qualifying and played to Tyler Adam’s strengths gobbling up most of opposing teams threats through qualifying. The team struggled to score, identify a striker and find ways to score goals for three years. The inability to figure this out was apparent early and brought up by Gregg after the US’ loss to Holland.
Young & Inexperienced Group
The roster that Berhalter took on needed to be completely overhauled. There were very few pieces worth keeping from the previous cycle of an aged MLS retirement squad. However there was a tremendous young crop of extremely promising players coming up in the wake of the 2018 failure.
The minimal expectation was qualification and debate has raged over how challenging that process truly is for CONCACAF. This allowed for more of a microscope on Gregg’s tenure than many coaches ahead of their takeover had faced. Gregg’s mind was on regaining US presence and achieving World Cup qualification, but many fans strived for and demanded more. The quality of the talent he inherited were achieving historic success in Europe’s top leagues, Champions League and making a name for themselves at the highest levels of world football. They are also extremely young, Tyler Adams was the youngest captain at the tournament and the team was 2nd youngest at the tournament (25.2 years). That average was slightly higher in the tournament than it had been (<25 years) during qualifying, in their October qualifier against Costa Rica they had an average age of 22.2.

The debate on the talent level has raged for years. Very few players through qualifying and the tournament had ever experienced a World Cup, many had been a part of a qualifying cycle. Did this play a part in their success or failure? All this experience discussion not to mention that their leader Gregg himself had never managed internationally, never led or been a part of leading World Cup qualifying off the pitch.
During this qualifying process many questions around the US roster call ups were brought up. Gregg was extremely slow to retire players from his pool that were apparent to not be key contributors to the group especially glaring were players like Jackson Yueill, Sebastian Lletget and Aaron Long, who was included on the World Cup roster. Jesus Ferreira looked unready for the position of 9 this cycle, but was included anyway and showed poorly in the 45 minutes he was given in Qatar.
Further playing into this debate was the pool itself. Sergiño Dest selected the United States of America over pursuing an opportunity with Holland. Yunus Musah was eligible for Ghana, England and Italy, however he makes a shocking decision to play for the US. Was this the work of the Brian McBride, GM hired to help with internationals or Gregg’s personal efforts to build relationships with players and prospects players? Perhaps also encouraging his players to reach out to these dual nationals. There are enough rumors and personal stories that confirm Gregg was involved in several dual nationals decisions to make the case for his value there. This was perhaps his most impactful moves as a manager. Musah was part of the central midfield nicknamed “MMA”. This trio were immensenly impactful, critical even, to the US success and the best central midfield collective I’ve seen play.
The players had some learning experiences along the way. Weston McKennie in particular during World Cup qualifying got himself into trouble breaking protocol and was sent home. This was hugely debated at the time and questions galore, but has since clearly shown to be handled well. McKennie himself has praised how the situation was handled and Gregg restored McKennie to the lineup.
“I’m glad we’re addressing this right away. Because when this thing happened, we stressed the importance of us having a young team, people making mistakes and people being held accountable for their mistakes. And that’s exactly what it was and what it is,” Berhalter said.
For the most part Berhalter had a relatively successful brand with his core players who continued on the roster. However many fans have continued to wonder through rumors and other places how great Gregg’s relationship was with all players. John Brooks name and curious legacy has been dragged for two years now since he was dropped from WCQ and inexplicably been left out. Others like Matt Miazga have hinted at some future stories that may emerge once Gregg is no longer the manager.
A bizarre interaction with Gregg and media regarding Haji Wright after 45 minutes in June.
Additionally, Gregg caused unnecessary drama after the World Cup when he made comments at an event that was tied to Gio Reyna. This came at the time the Athletic was releasing a story around Reyna’s limited minutes and the reporting they had to why this was happening. Reyna will certainly be one of the rising stars in the 2026 cycle and widely considered one of the best American young players in Europe. That could lead to some challenges for Berhalter’s selection as a manager with the young star.
Gio Reyna on Instagram in response to Gregg Berhalter’s comments and reports he was nearly sent home from Qatar for his behavior in-camp. pic.twitter.com/n4UJqN7JMl
— Men in Blazers (@MenInBlazers) December 12, 2022
One final area that was noticeable during his tenure was his rare ownership of losses or failures. After the loss to Canada, Gregg was demolished by the media for saying that the US dominated Canada in a 0-2 loss.
“I think it was an entire team effort that was outstanding,” Berhalter said. “We asked them to be dominant, we asked them to embrace the conditions, embrace the physicality of going and I think we did that and more.
“It’s hard for me to remember a performance away from home this dominant without getting a result.”
After losing to Holland, instead of owning it as a manager and identifying the defensive weaknesses of his own side; he leaned into his striker problems:
WHAT THEY SAID: “We don’t have a Memphis Depay right now, who’s scoring in the Champions League,” Berhalter proclaimed, despite Memphis never scoring a Champions League goal since joining Barcelona. “[The Netherlands] were clinical in their [scoring] opportunities in the first half. Other than that, there wasn’t much separating the teams.”
Ironically many fans pointed out we have more statistically successful players in Europe and Holland’s manager Louis van Gaal pointed to tactical failures on the manager’s part.
‘Team USA didn’t adjust, they didn’t adapt,’ he said. ‘We based a tactical plan on that [targeting the flanks] that probably allowed us to win. ‘
Success
All the above is for not if a manager isn’t successful on the field of battle. Fair or not, that is how all managers are ultimately weighed. The challenge for USSF and for fans is what is the measure of success. Gregg came into the position with debatable success to begin with. Many fans were excited to see a coach who had taken a small market club with no budget into the playoffs. Others saw a manager who had failed and been fired in Europe and never won anything domestically.
Preparation for World Cup qualifying, building a roster, building a system – execution and quality for wins, bringing the locker room together under a shared vision and belief. These are difficult things to break down and measure in a manager, but let’s look at the body of work.
In preperation for World Cup qualifying it was a mixed bag of reactions to roster selections and style of play, but success against rival Mexico cannot be debated. The US defeated Mexico three times in 2021, winning the Nations League (one of the best feelings of the cycle for me), the Gold Cup (with our B team) and defeating Mexico at home with a classic and deeply meaningful 2-0 scoreline in World Cup qualifying.

Making Mexico is a CONCACAF minnow
— Ethan Zombek (@eszombek) December 15, 2022
The debate of course here, lies in seeing Mexico’s body of work for the year and their poor performance at the World Cup. This was clearly not the Mexico of old, missing key players and their young prospects not panning out as quality as the young Americans had. In addition, not scoring goals and the two defeats to Canada hurt Berhalter’s body of work.
Gregg struggled with in game tactics his entire tenure. He rarely made the right impact substitution or lacked what seemed to be the right tactical changes in those critical manager minutes from 60-80 to make any case that he had a good feel for the game, his subs were limited but often due to his own roster selection or lack of development errors and he rarely tactically how managed his opponent once they had the opportunity to engage.
That all said, Gregg helped the USMNT qualify for the World Cup. This is ultimately the most critical piece of manager responsibility in World Cup Qualifying is to qualify. The Italians amongst many other nations would gladly take a last place spot to have been included in the 2022 tournament. However, the qualifying process didnt appear to grant Gregg the opportunity to solve one of his most glaring issues on the attacking side of the ball.
At the World Cup the US missed a golden opportunity to defeat Wales. The draw came of all things, on a defensive error that led to a penalty. The US looked strong against England achieving a draw once again, though at times looking the more dangerous and better side – especially in the midfield. Giving the Captain arm band to Adams, helping Weston McKennie navigate breaking team rules and recruiting Yunus Musah perhaps making Berhalter’s decision making important here. These two results however led a very talented team to a must win game against Iran which they ultimately did win 1-0. It was once again a debated result. The job of a team in a tournament is to move on yes, but many fans felt it was unconvincing and the inability to win against Wales forced Berhalter to play a tired starting XI too many minutes.
The US lost in the first group stage to the Netherlands 3-1. Not a side that is embarrassing to lose to, but certainly a scoreline not indicative of a strong defensive minded manager. The goals against were not prolific, but often missed assignments, perhaps from tired legs. The US had opportunity to draw this game down 2-1 after scoring to get in the game there were missed chances. Who is to blame? The debate rages on, but ultimately a win against Iran and two draws are what Berhalter’s young side come home with.
Next Steps
The US have increased their Elo ranking, remained undefeated against England and dominated Mexico in 2021. As stated above perhaps Berhalter’s biggest accomplishment was his potential involvement in the dual national recruitment arena. The team structure and culture overall seemed to be solid, though as pointed out above plenty of cracks in the walls. Most of the key items pointed out in Bob Morocco’s response below:
Pro’s:
— Bob Morocco (@bob_morocco) December 14, 2022
-Overall Good Results: moved the USMNT from an Elo ranking in the 30s to the 20s. Largely better results than past managers against all level of opponent.
-Dual National Recruitment: Dest and Musah alone are hugely valuable.
-Defensive Structure: both in possession and… https://t.co/ncWLUM42mI
What ultimately does the US want to look like and what are they planning and hoping to accomplish in 2026?
Gregg’s tactical strength were improving the defensive identity in the US, however in a few critical games we seemed to give key goals or make defensive errors (2-0 loss to Canada, 3-1 loss to Holland). Few of the backline will likely be part of a 2026 run – Dest, Antonee Robinson are likely, Joe Scally could be competing and it is likely Cameron Carter-Vickers and possibly Walker Zimmerman could compete at CB. It’ll be on the attacking side of our game we’ll need to improve and this area has not been Gregg’s strength. Gregg didn’t show a strong in game tactical management to make crucial changes that would shift the course of a game in the way we’ll need to make a deep run.
Gregg was a fantastic dual national recruiter and that was critical, how many more dual nationals are out there and can McBride with a new manager and a strong model replicate this? That will be difficult to measure and assess. Gregg’s cracks and flaws showed both in his commentary and some of his relationships. He often gave preference to domestic camp players and hung on to poor performers past when the player was losing their traction even in their own clubs. The lack of depth showed in the World Cup and would need improvement for a 2026 run.
Gregg has won Nations League and Gold Cup, but has few international successes or trophies, nor any improvement in is resume to show that he would have the caliber or tactics to really shift the mindset of even is existing players on how to level up from where they have performed. Few of even our top players outside of perhaps Christian Pulisic and Tyler Adams showed even as much of the qualities they’ve possed for their club for the national team.
For all the positives many fans have on Gregg Berhalter certainly the gap between good and great was apparent to all. Perhaps event to Gregg himself, who may want to pat himself on the back, say job well done and return to his favored club coaching career.
Can the US draw and inspire a successful international or touted club tournament manager into making a go of a run with the USMNT fan base and the host nation marketing that will come for that manager? Certainly that won’t inspire a top club manager, but may provide additional funding to make the pay competitive and the spotlight of a massive sports nation interest to glory seekers. The answer to that will define what’s next.
You may like
USMNT
Way-too-early USMNT 2030 FIFA World Cup roster projection
Published
4 days agoon
July 12, 2026
World Cup roster projections are a futile business.
That’s particularly true when you do it a whole four years out.
Yet, every four years, we do it anyway. The United States crashed out of their one-in-a-generation home World Cup this week after a 4-1 demolition by Belgium in Seattle, deferring their dreams of a first star for at least another cycle. Now it’s time to take a first-ever stab at who the players on that 2030 team will be.
Of course, this is more of an educated guess than a clear-cut prediction. A lot can happen in four years (see: Alex Freeman and Sebastian Berhalter or Yunus Musah and Josh Sargent). With that being said, here’s my current projected 26-man squad for the next World Cup, which will be held in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco.
Goalkeepers
1. Chris Brady (Current Club: Chicago Fire; Age in 2030: 26)
The crop of goalkeepers that the U.S. brought to the 2022 and 2026 World Cups is the weakest pool in decades. Fortunately, there are a few high-end prospects who will be old enough by 2030 to hopefully make progress on that front. One of those prospects – Chris Brady – was the third-string at this past World Cup (the youngest goalie the U.S. has brought to a World Cup since Tony Meola and Kasey Keller in 1990) and will be just beginning to enter his prime for the next one.
In terms of skill set, Brady has all the tools to be a world-class #1. His shot-stopping and reaction time are excellent; he possesses great size and reach, and has made progress on his ball-playing ability over the last three seasons in MLS. While his decision-making does leave something to be desired – meaning he isn’t quite ready yet to play regularly at the international level – it is an asset that will hopefully improve with time and experience and is completely normal for such a young goalkeeper. A move to a major European league should happen in the next few years, and he’s probably the current favorite to be the starter in 2030.
2. Diego Kochen (Lyngby Boldklub, on loan from FC Barcelona; 24)
In terms of talent, the other potential huge star is Barcelona’s Diego Kochen, who just joined Danish club Lyngby on loan in search of more minutes. Kochen was originally set to join the 2026 squad as a training player, but the need for a minor surgery meant he only stuck around for the pre-tournament friendlies. That’s been the story of his career so far: high hopes, but often paused by injuries or other setbacks. If that can be resolved, Kochen absolutely has a shot of competing with Brady, and those two seem like the best options to be the future of the U.S. goalkeeping position. If not, other talents like Julian Eyestone, Andrew Rick, or even still-quite-young Gaga Slonina could emerge to break into that picture.
3. Matt Turner (New England Revolution; 36)
With the hope being that two young goalkeepers will take over the position, it would be fair to guess that the third-string in four years will be a veteran. Matt Freese was the starter in 2026, but was clearly a weak link, and has had numerous blunders for the USMNT since his debut 13 months ago; he’ll absolutely stick around in the national team picture for at least a few more years, and still be 31 in 2030, but at this point I don’t know that he increases either the floor or the ceiling. For that reason, Matt Turner is my veteran pick for 2030, assuming he maintains his level in MLS with the Revolution; he will be 36, but would be a calm presence in the locker room with two prior World Cups under his belt, and fits the mold of a #3 keeper at that age.
Potential pool players: Matt Freese, Julian Eyestone, Andrew Rick, Gaga Slonina, Leonard Prescott
Center backs

1. Chris Richards (Crystal Palace; 30)
After playing every minute in four of the Americans’ five games in 2026, Richards is the bright spot in what has otherwise been a pretty poor generation of U.S. central defenders. Seeing as defenders typically peak between the ages of 28 and 31, the next World Cup could be his to be a true team leader in. In fact, as long as he stays healthy and continues to progress and mature in the Premier League, Richards currently seems like the safest bet for U.S. captain in 2030.
2. Noahkai Banks (FC Augsburg; 23)
This is where things get interesting. Tim Ream (who will be 42 at the next World Cup) defied all the odds to somehow still be a starter for the U.S. in 2026. Barring a medical and logical miracle, that means there are a lot of center back minutes up for grabs this cycle, and fortunately, the U.S. 2006-2008 age cohort possesses the most exciting group of blue-chip center back prospects the country has ever seen.
Chief among them is German-American Noahkai Banks, who featured 23 times for Augsburg in the Bundesliga last season and is arguably a top-10 center back prospect globally. The only problem is that he declined a March USMNT senior call-up to keep his dual-national eligibility intact. That doesn’t rule him out of representing the U.S. in the future, and the likes of Nico Schlotterbeck, Malick Thiaw, Finn Jeltsch, and €50 million Chelsea target Karim Coulibaly mean the pathway to Germany minutes is unclear. If Banks eventually decides to represent the U.S., he’ll be among the clear favorites to start from the get-go.
3. Christopher Cupps (Chicago Fire; 22)
This was one of the most challenging choices to make on the entire list. That aforementioned 2006-2008 age bracket has several center backs who could break into the national team picture in the next two years, and join Banks as a rare second young center back on a World Cup roster (though it would be far from a surprise, whether Banks commits to the U.S. or not, if multiple defenders from the 2006-2008 crop make the team).
Sporting Kansas City’s Ian James, the Philadelphia Union’s Neil Pierre, and Werder Bremen II’s Ramiz Hamouda are the three others I strongly considered, and any one of those could certainly explode in the near future. However, I find that Christopher Cupps, currently featuring for Chicago Fire II, has the highest ceiling of the bunch. Still just 18, Cupps has all the physical tools needed for an elite-level center back and has a top-level mindset that has enabled him to steadily develop his other skills. He has also shown those capabilities in a U.S. shirt, starring at the last U-17 World Cup and captaining practically every youth team he’s ever played on at every age group. While he has faced injury setbacks in the last year or so, if Cupps stays healthy and continues to develop to his full potential, he will be on the national team by 2030.
4. Auston Trusty (Celtic; 31)
I’ll be the first to admit that I was not an Auston Trusty advocate for a very, very long time. The last six months have changed my mind. In seeking a prime-age, left-footed center back to consider for 2030, Trusty currently seems like the best option, and is already someone who entered the USMNT history books when he scored the second-fastest goal in U.S. World Cup history last month. If he stays roughly level with the likes of Mark McKenzie, Miles Robinson, and Cameron Carter-Vickers, Trusty’s left-footedness will give him a clear edge.
Potential pool players: Mark McKenzie, Ian James, Neil Pierre, Ramiz Hamouda, Cameron Carter-Vickers, Josh Wynder
Full backs
1. Alex Freeman (Villarreal; 25)
Alex Freeman’s ascent from MLS Next Pro to USMNT World Cup star in the last 18 months has been something special. Now, he looks like a clear lock for the next edition as well and is currently on a trajectory to become a top La Liga right back within the next two seasons. Unless injuries crop up or his form completely stalls, Freeman will be a mainstay for the USMNT for years to come.
2. Peyton Miller (New England Revolution; 22)
Addressing the elephant in the room: Antonee Robinson is not on this list. While he has been a locked-in starter for the U.S. for six years, was at one point among the best in his position in the Premier League, and is arguably the country’s greatest-ever left back, the now 28-year-old has battled a truly painful run of injuries over the last few years. Robinson himself admitted it was a minor miracle that he was healthy enough to play in the 2026 World Cup, so given his injury history and the fact that he’ll be nearly 33 when 2030 kicks off, I decided to leave him out.
In terms of prospects, there are a few, and Peyton Miller is the most obvious, even if he’s spent much of his youth national team career playing as a winger. The 18-year-old from Connecticut heavily featured at the 2023 U-17 World Cup and 2025 U-20 World Cup, playing up age groups both times, and is a regular for a good team in MLS with European interest certain. If he develops, and particularly if the U.S. sticks with a wingback-reliant formation, I could see Miller emerging as a Robinson successor.
3. Luca Bombino (San Diego FC; 23)
A more traditional left-sided fullback for the future would be Luca Bombino of San Diego, who has developed well over the last year and a half and is now one of the best young left backs in MLS. The question now is whether he can take another big step in his development to fill the much-needed national team profile of lockdown left-back, and, if he can, eventually make the move to Europe. Christian McFarlane, Reed Baker-Whiting, and the still-talented but injury-riddled Caleb Wiley are other names who could make a push on the left side.
4. Sergiño Dest (PSV Eindhoven; 29)
It feels like just yesterday that Sergiño Dest was the skillful, adventurous young wingback at Ajax; it’s bizarre to even think about the fact that he’ll be 29 at the next World Cup. Dest has not reached the heights many hoped he would as a teenager; even if he has finally found a permanent home at the club level, it’s not at a European giant in a top five league. If (and this is a big if) he stays healthy, Dest should still make the 2030 roster, but he’ll certainly have to adapt his game as he inches toward the latter half of his prime.
5. Tim Weah (Olympique Marseille; 30)
Tim Weah is another one whose status as a clear roster lock will likely fade in the next cycle as younger players begin to emerge. The OM winger hardly played in this past World Cup and was, somewhat alarmingly, an unused substitute in both of the U.S.’s knockout games. Still, by 2030, his versatility and experience may make him a valuable option to keep around in a position group that could be very young for the U.S. in four years.
One more name I’d like to throw in there is Montrell Culbreath of Bayer 04 Leverkusen. If he commits to the United States over Germany, he is a wild-card right wing back option that almost certainly would walk straight into any U.S. roster overnight and if he continues his current ascent, could be an option to start in 2030.
Potential pool players: Montrell Culbreath, Frankie Westfield, Joe Scally, Reed Baker-Whiting, Christian McFarlane, Caleb Wiley
Central midfield
1. Adri Mehmeti (New York Red Bulls; 21)
The fact that only three true central midfielders went to the World Cup with the U.S. in 2026 indicates that it’s a position completely up for grabs in the next cycle. Enter Adri Mehmeti, who is one of the absolute most exciting U.S. prospects at the moment. The Albanian-American broke through into the New York Red Bulls first team at 16 this season and played the full 90 minutes in seven consecutive MLS games heading into the World Cup break. Learning under USMNT legend Michael Bradley, Mehmeti seems poised to be a Tyler Adams successor of sorts for club and country, and if he continues to progress at his current pace, could have his coming-out party at the 2030 World Cup.
2. Tyler Adams (AFC Bournemouth; 31)
Adams will still be around in four years and has been one of the USMNT’s most consistent players through his entire national team career. However, like Antonee Robinson, persistent injuries are taking a toll, and there’s no certainty he’ll be at as high a level as he once was come 2030. Nonetheless, unless his level drops too much, expect Adams to remain firmly entrenched as a veteran leader – and, by now, one of the U.S.’ greatest-ever midfielders – on the team at age 31.
3. Sebastian Berhalter (Vancouver Whitecaps; 29)
One of the most surprising stories of the last cycle was the emergence of Sebastian Berhalter, who, within two years, went from a fringe MLS starter to arguably the league’s best midfielder. An impressive showing in the World Cup, which saw him make four strong substitute appearances and score in his lone start, means his stock is higher than ever, and even at 25, a move to Europe seems like a distinct possibility. If he maintains that level throughout what are expected to be his prime years, Berhalter could be able to maintain his status as a national team squad player for 2030.
4. Jude Terry (Los Angeles FC; 21)
I’m taking a bit of a punt here by including LAFC’s Jude Terry as one of the final players to make the roster. He’s one of eight players on this list who will be 22 or younger in 2030, which is a lot compared to the two that made the 2026 roster (Brady and Freeman), but he’s a composed and tenacious profile that I quite like and stands out among the rather deep pool of talented young midfielders who could break into the pool for 2030… provided that LAFC enables him to find the right pathway. Niko Tsakiris, Brooklyn Raines, Pedro Soma, Matthew Corcoran, Taha Habroune, Benjamín Cremaschi, and even Sergio Oregel are among the names that have the talent to push for a spot, though the currently 17-year-old Terry is my favorite of the bunch.
Notably, I decided not to include any of the prime-age midfielders who failed to make the 2026 roster; Tanner Tessmann, Jack McGlynn, Aidan Morris, and Paxten Aaronson are the first to come to mind; seeing as I’ve retained all of the U.S. midfielders in this roster (barring Cristian Roldan, who will be 35), none of that group raise the floor of the team significantly if at all. I also left off Johnny Cardoso, despite clearly being a leading U.S. talent at the club level – he will be 28 and certainly in with a shout, but unless the next USMNT manager (whether it is Pochettino or someone else) can truly unlock his maximum level, his consistently poor performances at the international level may prevent him from making a World Cup roster. Similarly, Yunus Musah needs a revival at both the club and international levels if he wants to re-enter the picture.
Potential pool players: Johnny Cardoso, Niko Tsakiris, Yunus Musah, Aidan Morris, Brooklyn Raines, Jack McGlynn, Taha Habroune, Benjamín Cremaschi, Tanner Tessmann
Attacking midfield

1. Cavan Sullivan (Philadelphia Union, joining Manchester City; 20)
Something will have gone wrong for Cavan Sullivan if he isn’t a 20-year-old rising star on the USMNT’s World Cup roster four years from now. The Philadelphia Union’s biggest prospect, who has already agreed to join Manchester City in 2028 after he turns 18, has all the potential in the world and is already getting regular MLS minutes at the age of 16. Marketed as America’s greatest hope in many years, and one of the highest-rated teenage talents in U.S. history, 2030 could be a special opportunity for Sullivan to introduce himself to the wider U.S. public and footballing world.
Sullivan is the youngest player in this projected roster, though not the youngest mentioned; the Chicago Fire’s Robert Turdean, who is about three months younger than Sullivan and widely considered the second- or third-biggest prospect in that age bracket, is also one to keep an eye on. While a lot can happen in four years, 2030 may come too soon for him.
2. Malik Tillman (Bayer 04 Leverkusen; 28)
A pleasant surprise from the USMNT’s 2026 World Cup run was the fact that Malik Tillman – operating as a deep-lying playmaker next to Tyler Adams – was arguably the team’s top performer, despite playing the entire tournament outside of his natural position. He’s one of the biggest raw talents in the entire U.S. pool, so again, unless his form falls off of a cliff, he’ll be back in 2030 and should be in his prime. After a rough start to his international career, the FC Bayern product has finally found a rhythm and is now, quite incredibly, the United States’ joint-all-time leader in World Cup knockout goals.
3. Weston McKennie (Juventus; 31)
After a career year with Juventus in 2025/26 and a very solid World Cup performance, Weston McKennie has solidified himself not just as the consensus #2 USMNT player of his generation, but arguably as one of the greatest ever. If he continues playing at a high level, there’s no reason he won’t still be playing for the national team in 2030, even if he’s on the opposite side of his prime by then. It’s impossible to know what his position will be by then – he’s played a completely different role at each of the last three major tournaments – but it’s almost certain he’ll be involved in some capacity.
Potential pool players: Máximo Carrizo, Robert Turdean, Paxten Aaronson, Brenden Aaronson, Marvin Dills
Wingers

1. Christian Pulisic (AC Milan; 31)
There’s no need for reactionary post-2026 World Cup takes here: regardless of where in the world he’s playing, a healthy Christian Pulisic will almost certainly make the 2030 World Cup roster. At 27, there is a decent chance that the best and most consistent version of Pulisic is already behind us, and that is certainly a difficult pill to swallow. However, he still has plenty to give at both the club and international levels, and 2030 could be a great redemption opportunity for him in what will more than likely be his final World Cup.
2. Mathis Albert (Borussia Dortmund; 21)
From someone who broke through at Borussia Dortmund ten years ago to one who will break through there this year. Mathis Albert is one of the top U.S. prospects at the moment, and after debuting for BVB at the end of last season, he seems to be on the right trajectory toward being a future star. Additionally, the winger already has an impressive U-17 World Cup under his belt, shining at last fall’s edition despite playing up an age group; he’s eligible to return again for this year’s edition.
3. Zavier Gozo (Real Salt Lake; 23)
It’s clear that beyond Pulisic, winger is a position of desperate need for the U.S., which opens the door to lots of exciting young stars. As one of the final cuts from the 2026 roster despite still being uncapped, Zavier Gozo is clearly one of them. Gozo is one of MLS’ leading young talents right now and just made the league’s All-Star team as a 19-year-old; he also had a great U-20 World Cup last fall playing up two years. If he picks up his momentum from where he left off in the first half of the MLS season, the RSL homegrown will quickly break into the USMNT roster this fall, and should soon earn a move to a club in Europe’s top five leagues.
4. Gio Reyna (Borussia Mönchengladbach; 29)
Maybe a hopeful inclusion given his club form, but Reyna is undoubtedly the top U.S. talent in the early-2000s generation. He hasn’t been able to put it together regularly at the club level for years, but when he’s worn the national team uniform, he has consistently performed, and that earned him the trust of Mauricio Pochettino at the end of this past cycle. If Reyna can stay healthy and put the pieces together, I can see him making a third consecutive World Cup roster, likely once again as a wild card option from the bench. With that being said, he may need to take one step backward this summer to take two steps forward for the rest of the cycle.
An intentional omission here was Diego Luna, who has made many similar 2030 projections in recent days. While the 18-time U.S. international will probably get some call-ups in the coming months, he hasn’t done anything in a USMNT shirt anytime recently to suggest he has earned a return to the team. As a low-ceiling option whose only signature moments for the U.S. came in a January friendly and against Guatemala, there isn’t much point in persisting with Luna over younger, more exciting talents… like his club teammate Gozo.
Potential pool players: Cole Campbell, Nimfasha Berchimas, Quinn Sullivan, Kevin Paredes, Álex Zendejas
Center forwards
1. Folarin Balogun (AS Monaco; 28)
It’s been quite some time since the USMNT striker debate was this clear. The version of Folarin Balogun that showed up at the 2026 World Cup is arguably the best by an American striker in 96 years, and ridiculous red card controversy aside, he was one of the stories of the tournament for the U.S. team, scoring three times. As long as he keeps things rolling and continues scoring for club and country at the rate he is right now, Balogun will undoubtedly start for the U.S. once again in 2030 and at 28, he should be at the peak of his powers.
2. Julian Hall (New York Red Bulls; 22)
Another teenage MLS All-Star who seems poised for big things. Julian Hall exploded to start the 2026 season, playing so well that he was being talked about as a potential wild card option for this year’s World Cup. While that obviously didn’t happen, the 18-year-old – who notched his first senior hat trick against the Columbus Crew in May – is now someone firmly entrenched in the national team conversation and could break through as soon as this fall for friendly matches. The expectation would be that he will be in Europe within two to three years, and if that goes well, there’s likely no question he’ll be at the World Cup… as long as he doesn’t choose to represent Poland instead.
3. Malik Jakupović (Philadelphia Union; 21)
This is perhaps my boldest pick on the list, so I suppose I’m saving the best for last. Malik Jakupović is only 16 right now, but already stands at 6’3” (1.93m) and has an intriguing profile for a future off-the-bench USMNT attacking option. In addition to an excellent aerial ability, the Union striker presses very well and is rightfully getting minutes for an admittedly terrible Eastern Conference team. It is worth mentioning that Jakupović is also eligible for Bosnia & Herzegovina; U.S. Soccer will have to manage the situation well to avoid another Esmir Bajraktarević saga.
Unfortunately, the inclusion of Jakupović takes Ricardo Pepi out of the equation, which is one of the harshest decisions I had to make here. Despite being one of the top USMNT goal scorers under Gregg Berhalter, Pepi has struggled mightily since Mauricio Pochettino took over and has not scored for the U.S. in two years. Despite that, if he continues playing well at the club level, the El Paso native should be just fine.
CF: Ricardo Pepi, Damion Downs, Patrick Agyemang, Josh Sargent, Marcos Zambrano, Alexander Staff
Final Thoughts
In the impossible exercise that is future roster projection, I feel pretty good about this one. It includes 14 players from the current 2026 roster, which is just one more than the number that carried over from 2022 to 2026. The team’s average age is just over 26, making it slightly younger than the 2026 roster – aided by the absence of a nearly 39-year-old – but still older than the notably young 2022 team.
The more revealing detail, though, is the shape of the roster. Only three players on this list – Alex Freeman, Chris Brady, and Diego Kochen – would be between 24 and 27 years old in 2030, the age range that should theoretically be entering its prime. That reflects one of the defining developments of the last cycle, which is that many of the top prospects from the 2003 to 2006 age groups simply did not break through at the level once expected. It also doesn’t help that the two best American-born 2005s, Esmir Bajraktarević and Obed Vargas, now represent other national teams.
Four years ago, in my way-too-early projection for the 2026 roster, I correctly predicted 14 of 26 players. My biggest mistake was backing several prospects from those 2003-2006 age groups to emerge, only for late bloomers like Sebastian Berhalter, Max Arfsten, and Álex Zendejas to make the roster instead of players who were then part of the U.S. U-20 and U-17 pools.
The optimism here is less about the middle of the player pool and more about the next wave, particularly the 2007 to 2009 cohorts. Not all of those players will pan out, but there are enough high-end talents in those age groups to believe that several fresh faces will force their way into the USMNT picture before 2030.
The other notable thread is continuity from the last two tournaments. Seven players on this roster – Tyler Adams, Sergiño Dest, Weston McKennie, Christian Pulisic, Gio Reyna, Matt Turner, and Tim Weah – would be making a third World Cup roster. That group has defined this era of the USMNT, and if they are at the end of or past their prime four years from now, they would form the veteran spine around which the next generation is built – something that generation simply did not have to lean on in 2022.
USMNT
When Your Team Keeps Breaking Your Heart: Life as a USMNT Fan
Published
5 days agoon
July 11, 2026
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
Christian Pulisic suffered a fresh injury blow against Belgium (Getty)
Another World Cup, with the Same Ending
What kind of fan walks away from the team they’ve supported for years because it keeps disappointing them? What do you do when your national team always seems to fall just short of taking the next step? Do you simply switch your allegiance to a perennial contender like France, Argentina, or Spain and enjoy winning for a change?
I’ve already seen several USMNT fans on social media say they’re ready to move on, and honestly, I can’t blame them. Supporting this team can be emotionally exhausting.
For me, though, I don’t think I could ever make that change. I’ve invested too much time, energy, and passion into following the USMNT over the past three decades. Even if it means accepting yet another Round of 16 exit, this team is still my team.
Unfortunately, that’s exactly where this World Cup ended.
The USMNT became the final host nation eliminated in the Round of 16, continuing what has become an all-too-familiar trend. Five of the last six times the USMNT has reached the knockout stage, its tournament has ended in the Round of 16, this loss being the worst performance in my lifetime.
Many fans will understandably point to this tournament as a success. The USMNT accomplished things we had never seen before, winning the group after just two matches winning three matches and scoring 11 goals, both program records at a FIFA World Cup.
Those achievements deserve recognition.
But there’s another side of the argument.
The expansion of the tournament from 32 to 48 teams fundamentally changed the competition. With 16 additional teams, the path became more favorable than in previous World Cups, making those records more attainable than they would have been under the old format.
When the competition stiffened, many of the same issues resurfaced.
Against an aging Belgium side in the Round of 16, the USMNT was second best for much of the match. Belgium controlled long stretches, created the better chances, and ultimately deserved to advance. Once again, the USMNT failed to produce the signature victory over an elite opponent that every memorable generation of American soccer has delivered but we have yet to see from this team over the past two cycles.
What’s Next for the USMNT?
As attention turns toward the 2030 World Cup cycle, it’s difficult to find much optimism.
Mauricio Pochettino’s future remains uncertain, although multiple reports suggest US Soccer is eager to retain him. Personally, I think that would be the wrong decision.
Whether US Soccer pursues another internationally proven manager or returns to hiring another American coach, this decision will define the next four years. I’ll have much more to say about that in my next article.
The Long Wait Begins Again
There’s always an emptiness after your team is eliminated from a World Cup.
The excitement disappears overnight and now comes another long wait until September’s FIFA window, which features four matches over a double international window. Hopefully, those games provide fresh storylines and genuine reasons for optimism.
Because after that?
We’ll likely find ourselves right back in Concacaf Nations League and another Gold Cup next summer, competitions that, while important for development, simply don’t carry the same significance or emotion as the FIFA World Cup.
As always, I’ll keep watching. I’ll keep analyzing. I’ll keep believing that one day this team will finally produce the defining World Cup moment that this generation has been chasing.
But after another Round of 16 exit on home soil, that belief is harder to hold onto than ever before.
USMNT
Ranking the Most Impactful USMNT Players in World Cup History
Published
1 month agoon
June 13, 2026
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
The U.S. Men’s National Team has played 37 World Cup matches across ten tournaments, producing no shortage of memorable moments and standout performances. Below is my ranking of USMNT players based on their World Cup impact, some from a single tournament, others across multiple appearances.
I’ve taken a few liberties with ties, as in several cases no single player clearly stood above the rest; instead, the moment itself, and the collective effort, defined the performance.
Honorable Mention:
Marcelo Balboa – Appearing in three consecutive World Cups (1990, 1994, and 1998), he anchored the USMNT defense throughout an important era of growth for the program. He also came close to one of the tournament’s most memorable moments with a spectacular bicycle kick attempt off a corner against Colombia that nearly found the net.
Michael Bradley – Across three World Cups (2006, 2010, and 2014), Michael Bradley was a driving force in the USMNT midfield, known for his engine, composure, and leadership. He delivered a crucial game-tying goal against Slovenia in 2010 and later provided the assist on Julian Green’s memorable strike in 2014, consistently stepping up in key moments on the world stage.
Cobi Jones – While Cobi Jones remains the all-time leader in USMNT caps and earned 11 World Cup appearances across three consecutive tournaments, he did not register any goal contribution in any of those World Cups.
Eddie Pope – Across three World Cups (1998, 2002, and 2006), Eddie Pope was a cornerstone of the USMNT backline, known for his composure, positioning, and aerial dominance. He played a vital role in the team’s run to the quarterfinals in 2002, anchoring a disciplined defense and providing veteran leadership against some of the world’s top attacking talent.
Matt Turner – If Turner earns the starting role and delivers a standout performance during a deep USMNT run, coming up with game-changing saves, he could break into the top 10 while surpassing the current records for wins and shutouts.
#10 – 1930 USMNT Pioneers-TIED
Jimmy Douglas
World Cups: 1 (1930)
Matches: 3
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 2
Bert Patenaude
World Cups: 1 (1930)
Matches: 3
Goals: 4
Assists: 2

With limited historical data and in the context of the very first FIFA World Cup, I’m combining two true pioneers of the USMNT. Jimmy Douglas remains the only USMNT goalkeeper to record two wins and two shutouts in World Cup play, all achieved at the inaugural 1930 tournament, where the United States secured a third-place finish.
On the attacking side, Bert Patenaude scored four goals in that same tournament, including a hat trick in the U.S. second and final group-stage match. His performances were instrumental in helping guide the United States to its third-place finish in the first-ever FIFA World Cup.
#9 – 1950 USMNT Heros-TIED
Frank Borghi
World Cups: 1 (1950)
Matches: 3
Wins: 1
Shutouts: 1
Joe Gaetjens
World Cups: 1 (1950)
Matches: 3
Goals: 1
Assists: 0

Another historic meeting, shaped by similar circumstances to the first group, but what is known for certain is that the USMNT pulled off a stunning victory over one of the top sides at the 1950 World Cup. Frank Borghi delivered a remarkable performance in goal throughout the match, standing firm under relentless pressure.
The breakthrough came in the 38th minute when Joe Gaetjens scored a crucial goal to give the USMNT the lead. From there, the match shifted entirely onto the shoulders of the U.S. defense and goalkeeping, who held strong to secure a famous 1–0 victory over England one of the greatest upsets in World Cup history.
Earnie Stewart
World Cups: 3 (1994, 1998, 2002)
Matches: 11
Goals: 1
Assists: 0
#8 – 1994 USMNT Trailblazers-TIED
Eric Wynalda
World Cups: 3 (1990, 1994, 1998)
Matches: 8
Goals: 1
Assists: 0

Two of the USMNT’s early trailblazers, Eric Wynalda and Earnie Stewart, delivered defining World Cup moments on home soil at the 1994 FIFA World Cup. Both played pivotal roles in energizing a new generation of American soccer fans.
The USMNT’s first goal of that tournament came via one of the most iconic set pieces in World Cup history, earning a crucial draw in the opener. That momentum carried forward when Stewart netted the game-winner against heavily favored Colombia, securing the United States’ first World Cup victory since 1950.
.
#7 – Claudio Reyna
World Cups: 4 (1994, 1998, 2002, 2006)
Matches: 10
Goals: 0
Assists: 0

Named to four World Cup squads and appearing in three, Claudio Reyna was a cornerstone of the USMNT for more than a decade. While he didn’t record a goal contribution on the World Cup stage, his influence was undeniable, dictating tempo, providing composure in midfield, and serving as captain in both the 2002 and 2006 tournaments.
#6 – DaMarcus Beasley
World Cups: 4 (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 11
Goals: 0
Assists: 1

DaMarcus Beasley is the only USMNT player to appear in four World Cups (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014), a testament to his remarkable longevity, versatility, and consistent impact across multiple generations.
He emerged on the global stage at the 2002 World Cup as an explosive, attack-minded winger, using his pace and direct play to stretch defenses and play a key role in the United States’ run to the quarterfinals. As his career progressed, Beasley reinvented himself, most notably transitioning to left back by the 2014 World Cup, where his experience, defensive discipline, and composure helped stabilize the back line against elite international competition.
#5 – Brad Friedel
World Cups: 3 (1994, 1998, 2002)
Matches: 6
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 1

Brad Friedel’s World Cup legacy is defined by consistency, composure, and elite shot-stopping across multiple tournaments. He served as the primary starter at the 2002 World Cup, made a start at the 1998 World Cup, and was the backup to Tony Meola in 1994, providing a steady, reliable presence in goal during a pivotal era for the USMNT.
His standout performances came in 2002, highlighted by his penalty-saving heroics. Friedel recorded two penalty saves in the tournament (excluding shootouts), tying the World Cup record for most in a single edition. His ability to deliver in high-pressure moments played a key role in the United States’ run to the quarterfinals and solidified his place among the program’s all-time great goalkeepers.
#4 – Brian McBride
World Cups: 3 (1998, 2002, 2006)
Matches: 10
Goals: 3
Assists: 1

Brian McBride’s World Cup legacy is defined by big goals, relentless work rate, and a fearless, physical style that helped set the tone for the USMNT on the global stage. He scored the team’s only goal at the 1998 World Cup against Iran, rising to meet a corner kick with authority.
In 2002, he played a pivotal role in the opening-match upset of Portugal, constantly pressuring the defense and helping spark the historic win, before delivering again with a goal against Mexico in the Round of 16 to send the US. to the quarterfinals.
His grit and determination were on full display in his final World Cup in 2006, when he famously continued playing after suffering a broken nose and a bloodied face, an enduring symbol of his toughness, leadership, and commitment to the team.
#3 – Tim Howard
World Cups: 3 (2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 8
Wins: 2
Shutouts: 1

A starter in back-to-back World Cups, Tim Howard delivered on the biggest stage when it mattered most. From his record-setting 16-save performance against Belgium at the 2014 World Cup, widely regarded as one of the greatest goalkeeping displays in World Cup history, to his consistent ability to keep the United States competitive against elite opposition, he repeatedly elevated his game under pressure.
His shot-stopping brilliance, commanding presence, and calm leadership in high-intensity moments define a legacy that places him among the most influential goalkeepers the USMNT has ever had on the World Cup stage.
#2 – Clint Dempsey
World Cups: 3 (2006, 2010, 2014)
Matches: 10
Goals: 4
Assists: 0

From his goal just 29 seconds into the match against Ghana at the 2014 World Cup, the fastest in USMNT World Cup history, to his composed finish against England in 2010 World Cup that helped secure a crucial draw, to becoming the first American to score in three different World Cups, Clint Dempsey consistently delivered on the game’s biggest stage.
Those moments, combined with his toughness, edge, and ability to show up in key situations, cement his place as one of the most impactful USMNT players in World Cup history.
#1 – Landon Donovan
World Cups: 3 (2002, 2006, 2010)
Matches: 12
Goals: 5
Assists: 3

From his dramatic stoppage-time winner against Algeria that sent the USMNT into the knockout stage, to his goal in the “Dos a Cero” victory over Mexico that helped propel the team to the quarterfinals, to his deflected strike off Jorge Costa that contributed to him being named Best Young Player of the 2002 World Cup, Landon Donovan consistently delivered on the biggest stage.
Taken together, those moments make a strong case that he’s been the most impactful USMNT player in World Cup history, and it only adds to the “what if” of how much more he might have achieved had he been part of the 2014 squad.
Way-too-early USMNT 2030 FIFA World Cup roster projection
When Your Team Keeps Breaking Your Heart: Life as a USMNT Fan
Ranking the Most Impactful USMNT Players in World Cup History
Trending
-
Club News6 years agoCJ dos Santos, Benfica
-
Club News6 years agoGive: Support Chasing a Cup by Supporting our Cause
-
USMNT2 years agoGregg Berhalter’s Legacy
-
Club News6 years agoJulian Vincente Araujo
-
Club News2 years agoAmerican Transfers: Stock Up & Stock Down
-
USMNT2 years agoMedals on their Minds
-
USMNT2 years agoUSMNT Kits Come in Different Styles and Colors
-
USMNT3 years ago
World Cup Format History
