USMNT
Dual National Panic
Published
5 years agoon
The Dual National Situation
Let’s talk about Dual Nationals. With this November Camp roster having several un-caped dual nationals and December camp having more, this conversation has come up once again. As with most USMNT fans, I believe it is an important one. There are many elements to the dual national question, so let’s break it down.
The USMNT is becoming a very attractive team to play for. The young talent coming up at big name academies and playing at some of the world’s largest clubs is a massive draw. The willingness to give youth players a chance shows dual nationals that they will have a place in the team. For some the opportunity to play with the USMNT may come up before the opportunity to play for their other country/contries because of our willingness to give youth a chance.
USMNT Recruitment
There are several people responsible for dual national recruitment. They are all integral to the process and each does something a little different. To successfully recruit, it is important that everyone is on the same page and working together. While each group has certain tasks in their job description, in reality, different people may do different things for each player. The importing thing is that someone is covering all the bases with each player.
Youth National Team
The youth national teams are an excellent way to bring in promising dual nationals and start integrating them into the program. It shows kids from a young age that they have promise and are valued in our program. Unfortunately, the work of the youth national team coaches can often be overlooked, but it is extremely important and makes a massive difference in the end.
“The USMNT helped me when it didn’t go well, and I’m thankful for that. They helped me through hard times, and if they hadn’t given me a chance, maybe I wouldn’t be here now…maybe I’d never have reached this level.”
Sergiño Dest on Choosing the USMNT
Gregg Berhalter and USMNT Coaching Staff
The senior USMNT coaching staff is integral in the recruitment of dual nationals, since after all these are the people the player will be playing under. Therefore, they must communicate the desire to have the player. The staff will explain their plan for him and how he fits into the team set-up. It is also important that they make the players feel welcome and a part of the team. Once that is done, the final decision is down to the player.
Earnie Stewart and Brian McBride
As overseers of the whole men’s program, Stewart and McBride have a vital role in the recruitment and retention of dual nationals. They are tasked with identifying potential players that are not currently in the US set-up. They are also responsible for ensuring the player that the US is watching and connecting the player and his family.
Outside Influences
Choosing a national team is a very personal decision. There are a lot of factors that influence a player’s ultimate decision. These influences are often out of the control of US Soccer. Despite that, it is important to understand them.
A player’s friends and teammates can have great influence over a player. If a player is at a club with a large number of internationals for one of his nationalities, they can help recruit the player on a daily basis. It means he already knows others on that team when he is called up. The club he is at can also try to encourage the player to select one team over another.
Experiences had with his other national team also influence a player. If a player has a bad experience with one of his other national teams, that can make him more likely to play for the USMNT. Similarly if a player has a bad experience with the USMNT, it can make him more likely to switch.
“It was good, but I wasn’t comfortable there. I just didn’t feel comfortable. I didn’t feel like one of them, you know? The facilities were great, the coaches were great, but I didn’t feel comfortable.”
Uly Llanez on his time with the Mexico Youth National Team
The most important external factor though, is if the player feels American. If the player does not feel like an American and does not really want to play for the USMNT, then he will not. A dual-national needs to want to be apart of the program and represent the USA. If he does not, then the USMNT is not his team.
The Rules for Dual National Players
FIFA sets the rules for national team eligibility. The rules can be found in the FIFA Statutes. For the USMNT, there are three key clauses. They relate to provisional cap-ties, one-time switched, and cap-ties. Understanding the rules is crucial to understanding the dual national conversation.
Provisional Cap-Tie
When a player plays in an official youth tournament, they are provisionally cap-tied. Once a player is provisionally cap-tied he is only eligible for nations that he was eligible for at the time of his provisional cap-tie. He can still switch nations, however, he must file a one-time switch to do so. A provisionally cap-tied player can also still accept call-ups to other nations he remains eligible for, but he cannot play until a one-time switch is approved.
For the USMNT, this is important information to know. It can help filter through the dual national pool to see who is still available to represent the US. On the other side it can also narrow down who is now only able to represent the USMNT.
One-time Switch
Filing a one-time switch, officially a change of association, enables a player to change his national team. This can only be done once. After it is approved, it can not be undone. As a result, it is a very serious decision. Players typically take some time and put in a lot of thought before filing.
“He has not played a match (either in full or in part) in an official competition at “A” international level for his current Association, and at the time of his first full or partial appearance in an international match in an official competition for his current Association, he already had the nationality of the representative team for which he wishes to play”
Conditions to file a one-time switch, Article 18.1.a
Once a player decides to file for the switch, there is paperwork that must be completed and sent to FIFA. The Players’ Status Committee then reviews the paperwork and issues a decision on the switch. The player is ineligible to play for any nation while waiting on a decision. If the switch is approved, the player is immediately tied to his new nation. If the request is denied, the player remains eligible for his original nation.
Cap-Tie
The most straightforward of the rules is the cap-tie. A player becomes permanently cap-tied after appearing in an official senior or “A” international competition. There is no way to un-do or switch nationalities after a player is cap-tied.
There have been some discussions recently about adjusting the cap-tie rules. These adjustments are based on preventing predatory cap-ties. The proposed rule changes would allow a player to switch nationalities if he played fewer than 3 times, all before his 21st birthday, after 3 years.
Avoiding potentially predatory cap-ties when discussing USMNT dual nationals is extremely important. If the US were to cap-tie a player as a teenager, then his development stagnates, he could fall out of the US pool. However, he may have remained in the pool for his other national team/s. Getting top players cap-tied is extremely important, but it can also be a dangerous game. It is important to give young dual nationals some time to make sure they are confident in their decision before proceeding with a cap-tieing match.
The Role of Dual Nationals
Dual Nationals are a massive part of the USMNT and America. They are extremely important to the team and nation. The USMNT features many players with multiple nationalities. All are extremely valuable. These players must be recruited into the set-up. The USMNT needs to have a plan for them and communicate it.
While the recruitment and integration of dual nationals is important, it is also important to not overlook single nationals. A dual national player should not be given a spot simply because he is a dual national. He needs to earn his place. It is delicate balance of ensuring the player feels valued and not favoring the player to get him to commit to the USMNT.
Navigating the integration and recruitment of dual nationals will always be a hot topic to discuss. There will always be someone left off or leaving the USMNT. The important thing to remember is that every player has very personal reasons for selecting his national team. A player chosing to play for someone else, does not automatically mean something went wrong. What matters is that every effort was made to show he has a place on the USMNT.
You may like
-
One Qualifying Window Down, Four To Go
-
USMNT and the 3rd Olympic Qualifying Failure
-
American Goalkeeper Carver Miller Promoted to Arminia Bielefeld’s U19 Team
-
A Turn of Events: Jordan Morris Finally Enroute to Europe?
-
More Than Golazos: Who is Red Bull’s Caden Clark
-
Mark McKenzie, Philadelphia Union
From Maradona to Messi: A Quick Look at World Cups 1986–2022
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
A quick look back at the last ten World Cups reveals how the world’s greatest sporting event has evolved and grown through the decades. With over 200 days until the 2026 FIFA World Cup kicks off, here’s a high-level recap of the tournaments that shaped its legacy, and a glimpse of what’s next.
1986 – Mexico
Diego Maradona delivered a World Cup for the ages, scoring both the “Goal of the Century” and the infamous “Hand of God” in the same match, then leading Argentina past West Germany to claim their second World Cup title.
1990 – Italy
The USA returned to the World Cup after a 50-year absence in what became the lowest-scoring tournament in history, as West Germany edged Argentina 1–0 on a late penalty. It marked West Germany’s final World Cup before reunification.
1994 – United States
The USA hosted its first-ever World Cup, setting all-time attendance records as Brazil defeated Italy in the tournament’s first final decided by a penalty shootout in front of the largest crowds in US since the 1984 Olympics.
1998 – France
FIFA’s first 32-team World Cup saw host nation France capture its first-ever title, becoming the seventh country to win the trophy. Led by Zinedine Zidane triumphed on home soil with a commanding victory over defending champions Brazil.
2002 – South Korea/Japan
The first World Cup with co-hosting nations saw South Korea stun many by reaching the semifinals, while Brazil claimed their fifth title, powered by Ronaldo’s two goals in the final against Germany.
2006 – Germany
Germany came up short on home soil, losing in extra time to eventual first-time finalist Italy in the semifinal. Italy went on to claim its fourth World Cup, edging France on penalties in a final forever marked by Zidane’s infamous headbutt in extra time.
2010 – South Africa
The first World Cup hosted by a CAF nation, South Africa, saw the host nation become the first ever to fail to advance past the group stage. Meanwhile, Spain captured their first World Cup, showcasing their tiki-taka mastery and defeating the Netherlands in extra-time with Andrés Iniesta’s decisive goal.
2014 – Brazil
Host nation Brazil reached the semifinals on home soil but suffered a shocking 7–1 defeat to Germany and then fell 3-0 to the Netherlands in the third-place match. Germany went on to defeat Argentina in extra time, with Mario Götze scoring the decisive goal, while Lionel Messi claimed the Golden Ball as the tournament’s best player.
2018 – Russia
France’s golden generation, spearheaded by tournament Best Young Player Kylian Mbappé, captured their second World Cup title with a thrilling 4–2 victory over Croatia, led by Golden Ball winner Luka Modrić.
2022 – Qatar
The 2022 World Cup, overshadowed by controversies over migrant worker treatment and extreme heat, which pushed the tournament to November and December, ultimately delivered a historic finale. Lionel Messi achieved crowning glory as Argentina triumphed on penalties in a thrilling 3–3 final against France, highlighted by Kylian Mbappé’s hat-trick.
2026 – United States/Mexico/Canada
The 2026 World Cup will feature a major expansion from 32 to 48 teams and, for the first time ever, be hosted by three nations. Mexico will make history as the first country to host matches in three different World Cups, while the United States becomes the sixth nation to host at least twice. What unforgettable moments will define this landmark tournament?
USMNT
One Home or Many? The Debate Over a Primary Venue for U.S. Soccer
Published
3 weeks agoon
October 16, 2025Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
The logics of the United States make it almost impossible for the USMNT or USWNT to have a primary venue to play all of their home matches but a trend of playing in a handful of stadiums has been developing over the last couple of cycles. US Soccer says there are specific factors behind where matches are played, some make sense, while others come across as lazy or lacking creativity.
If and when Major League Soccer aligns with the FIFA calendar and observes international breaks, more MLS stadiums could become available for matches. While not all MLS venues currently feature natural grass, US Soccer has indicated they would be willing to invest in installing grass, though at a cost of around $500K and with potential concerns about surface reliability.
Global Approach to Scheduling
Many of the top-tier international teams play their World Cup qualifiers and other critical matches in a primary venue or two. Here’s a sample of some of those countries and generally where they play based on my research.
Here are some of the more notable nations that play nearly all of their home matches at a single venue, a setup made practical by their smaller size and simpler logistics, which also makes it easier for fans.
Germany and Spain are known for rotating their non-critical home matches across multiple venues.
Argentina-Estadio Monumental (River Plate)
Belgium– King Baudouin Stadium (Brussels)
Colombia-Estadio Metropolitano Roberto Meléndez
England-Wembley Stadium
France– Stade de France (Saint-Denis, near Paris)
Italy-Stadio Olimpico
Northern Ireland-Windsor Park (Belfast)
Norway-Ullevaal Stadion (Oslo)
Portugal– Estádio da Luz (Lisbon)
Republic of Ireland-Aviva Stadium (Dublin)
Scotland-Hampden Park (Glasgow)
Uruguay-Estadio Centenario
Wales-Cardiff City Stadium
What’s in a location?
Here’s a look at the past few cycles, highlighting the USMNT’s home matches and the venues they’ve used. While US Soccer has clarified that they don’t control Gold Cup or Nations League venue selection, a point still under debate, they do manage the locations for Friendlies and World Cup qualifiers and continue to review and adjust those choices.
2026 Cycle (Matches Scheduled Through the end of 2025) – 46 Home Matches – 30 unique cities
So far, half of the USMNT’s home matches in the 2026 cycle have been held across eight venues. Only two more windows, March and May/June, remain for Friendlies before the 2026 World Cup.
- 4-AT&T Stadium, Arlington, Texas
- 4-Energizer Park, previously CityPark, St. Louis, Missouri
- 4-Q2 Stadium, Austin, Texas
- 3-Inter&Co Stadium (previously Orlando City Stadium and Exploria Stadium, Orlando, Florida
- 2-Allegiant Stadium, Paradise, Nevada
- 2-Geodis Park, Nashville, Tennessee
- 2-Rentschler Field, East Hartford, Connecticut
- 2-TQL Stadium, Cincinnati, Ohio
AT&T Stadium, Arlington, TX
2022 Cycle – 43 Home Matches – 24 unique cities
I can almost give US Soccer a pass on city and venue selection during the 2022 cycle, given the global circumstances at the time. That said, it’s interesting that they scheduled three consecutive home World Cup qualifiers in Ohio, with final round two matches in Columbus. Columbus has been a recurring choice, hosting multiple qualifiers in 2014, 2018, and 2022, handling one match each during both the semifinal and final rounds of qualifying in 2014 and 2018.
Lower.com, Columbus, Ohio
2018 Cycle – 47 Home Matches – 33 unique cities
During the 2018 cycle, the USMNT played in a wider variety of cities and venues. Aside from four matches in Carson, California for the January camp, they only repeated a location eleven times.
Dignity Health Sports Park, Carson, CA
2014 Cycle – 43 Home Matches – 29 unique cities
During the 2014 cycle, the USMNT repeated cities twelve times, but only two cities hosted more than two matches: Carson, California, where two of three games were for Camp Cupcake, and Kansas City, Kansas, which hosted three matches.
Children’s Mercy Park, Kansas City, Kansas
2010 Cycle – 35 Home Matches – 18 unique cities
One of the leanest home schedules in recent cycles saw the USMNT play in just 18 different cities, with 11 of them hosting only a single match. Over half of their home games were concentrated in four cities: Carson, California (7 matches); Chicago, Illinois (5 matches); and Foxborough, Massachusetts and Washington, D.C. (3 matches each).
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL
2006 Cycle – 44 Home Matches – 24 unique cities
The USMNT played eight matches in Foxborough, Massachusetts—double the number held in the next two cities, Columbus, Ohio, and Miami, Florida, which each hosted four matches. Notably, the team has excelled in Foxborough, losing only once in 22 games played there.
Foxboro Stadium, Foxborough, MA
2002 Cycle – 38 Home Matches – 16 unique cities
During the 2002 cycle, California was clearly a preferred destination for the USMNT, hosting matches in five different cities across twelve games. Foxborough, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C. each hosted five matches as well.
Rose Bowl Stadium, Pasadena, CA
1998 Cycle– 40 Home Matches – 21 unique cities
Washington D.C. was the city of choice for the USMNT during the 1998 cycle playing six matches. The USMNT would also play more than two matches in Los Angeles, California (5 matches), Foxborough, Massachusetts (4 matches) and Pasadena, California (3 matches) while playing only one match in twelve other cities.
RFK Stadium, Washington, DC
Long Term Venue Strategy
While US Soccer may favor a single venue for most USMNT and USWNT matches, doing so would limit access for thousands of fans across the country. However, with the move to Georgia and the Arthur M. Blank U.S. Soccer National Training Center set to open in early 2026, ahead of the World Cup, it’s likely that future matches will focus on venues within three to four hours of Atlanta. We can expect the majority of games to continue taking place in roughly ten to twelve core cities.
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
With the September FIFA window now in the rearview mirror, and only three more windows left before final rosters are set in late May or early June 2026, Mauricio Pochettino has drawn a clear line.
He’s stated that September’s camp was the “last camp to have the possibility for new faces.”
If we take him at his word, the nearly 70 players who’ve been called across six camps and the Gold Cup will form the pool from which he selects the 2026 World Cup squad.
Of the 60 players named to the 2025 Gold Cup provisional roster, only five, Maxi Dietz, Richie Ledezma, Tim Tillman, Caleb Wiley, and Griffin Yow, have yet to appear on a #USMNT roster under Pochettino.
Comparing the 2025 Nations League provisional roster to the Gold Cup list reveals over a dozen different players, raising the question: are these minor differences simply the edges of the player pool Pochettino intends to draw from?
Goalkeepers
Nine goalkeepers have been called into Pochettino’s camps, but it’s clear that Matt Freese is his first-choice right now, with Matt Turner likely the No. 2 as we sit just 10 months from the World Cup.
- Chris Brady
- Drake Callender
- Roman Celentano
- Matt Freese
- Ethan Horvath
- Jonathan Klinsmann
- Diego Kochen
- Patrick Schulte
- Zack Steffen
- Matt Turner
Fullbacks
Outside of Sergiño Dest and Antonee Robinson, the USMNT’s fullback depth remains a concern. Pochettino appears high on MLS defenders Alex Freeman and Max Arfsten, while Caleb Wiley, though yet to feature in a USMNT camp but named to recent provisional rosters, could still be on his depth chart.
- Max Arfsten
- Sergino Dest
- Alex Freeman
- Marlon Fossey
- DeJuan Jones
- Kristoffer Lund
- Shaquell Moore
- Antonee Robinson
- Joe Scally
- John Tolkin
Centerbacks
Center back remains another position with uncertain depth. Chris Richards and the veteran Tim Ream look like locks for now, leaving three spots up for grabs. If Pochettino opts for a back three, that tactical shift could influence which players ultimately make the cut. Notably, Jackson Ragen and Maxi Dietz are the only center backs from the recent provisional rosters who haven’t been called into a USMNT camp.
- Noahkai Banks
- Tristan Blackmon
- George Campbell
- Cameron Carter-Vickers
- Mark McKenzie
- Tim Ream
- Chris Richards
- Miles Robinson
- Auston Trusty
- Walker Zimmerman
Central Midfielders
The central midfield position is the deepest for the #USMNT, with many players in the pool capable of also playing fullback, center back, or winger. Although Richie Ledezma has primarily played as a right back and right wing-back for his current club and for PSV last season, USMNT coaches view him primarily as a midfielder. This likely explains why he hasn’t yet been called into a USMNT camp.
- Tyler Adams
- Sebastian Berhalter
- Gianluca Busio
- Johnny Cardoso
- Ben Cremaschi
- Luca de la Torre
- Emeka Eneli
- Jack McGlynn
- Weston McKennie
- Aidan Morris
- Yunus Musah
- Tanner Tessmann
- Sean Zawadzki
Attacking Midfielders
There are several players at this position who could add real quality and play pivotal roles for the #USMNT at next summer’s World Cup. Gio Reyna remains a major question mark, but his talent is undeniable. With his recent club change, there’s hope he can return to the high level of form we’ve seen from him in the past.
- Brenden Aaronson
- Paxten Aaronson
- Brian Gutiérrez
- Djordje Mihailovic
- Matko Miljevic
- Gio Reyna
- Malik Tillman
Wingers
The winger position remains thin for the #USMNT, though several players there can also slot in as attacking midfielders, strikers, or even fullback. Notably, two young wingers, Cole Campbell and Griffin Yow, appeared on provisional rosters but have yet to be called into any Pochettino camp.
- Cade Cowell
- Diego Luna
- Christian Pulisic
- Quinn Sullivan
- Indiana Vassilev
- Tim Weah
- Haji Wright
- Alejandro Zendejas
Strikers
Another area of concern for the USMNT is striker depth. While the top options have all produced well for their clubs when healthy, injuries have kept the pool thin. If everyone is fit, the primary competition for the starting role likely comes down to three players: Folarin Balogun, Ricardo Pepi, and Josh Sargent. Haji Wright and Tim Weah can also step in as center-forward options if needed.
- Patrick Agyemang
- Folarin Balogun
- Damion Downs
- Jesus Ferreira
- Ricardo Pepi
- Josh Sargent
- Brandon Vazquez
- Brian White
Conclusion
It’s tough to read Pochettino’s mindset right now. Many expect fewer MLS players to be called for the October window, partly because the league continues through FIFA dates and the regular season ends mid-October.
Most World Cup rosters largely select themselves, with only a few surprising omissions, think of the 1994 squad, which left out several players many felt deserved a spot.
But with Pochettino still showing a shaky grasp of the USMNT player pool, this cycle could produce more notable snubs than ever, though there’s still time for him to get it right.
From Maradona to Messi
One Home or Many? The Debate Over a Primary Venue for U.S. Soccer
The constructing of a World Cup roster
Trending
- Club News1 year ago
American Transfers: Stock Up & Stock Down
- USMNT2 years ago
USMNT Kits Come in Different Styles and Colors
- Club News6 years ago
Julian Vincente Araujo
- Club News5 years ago
CJ dos Santos, Benfica
- USMNT5 years ago
A Hidden Gem: Barça Residency Academy
- USMNT2 years ago
Is the MLS Specifically Targeting Expansion to USL Cities?
- USMNT3 years ago
World Cup Format History
- USMNT6 years ago
MLS Quota