Connect with us

USMNT

Roster Exclusion Categories

Published

on

It’s easy to get lost in all the meltdowns and outrage that takes place on USMNT Twitter any time a roster is released.  Inevitably, anyone who follows the team, and the player pool passionately will disagree with one decision or another.  That isn’t a helpful exercise.  A constructive exercise is to break down the exclusions by categories, reasons they were not called or status on the team.  When you do this for the October roster, here is how it breaks down:

INJURED (Self-explanatory.  Unavailable due to injury)

Christian Pulisic YNT USMNT USYNT Star Chelsea

Christian Pulisic

Gio Reyna

Pulisic is close to a return and may even feature this weekend for Chelsea.  Gio is likely not far behind.  But neither needs to be risked here and I would imagine neither of their clubs would be very happy that important players were injured while away on international duty, come back and don’t play for a month then go right back out on international duty where they could be risking further injury.  I think leaving them off is sensible, both from a risk standpoint and from a club relations standpoint.  This is fine.

SNUBS (Legitimate snubs.  Guys who have been part of the group and who wouldn’t have been surprising starters but instead weren’t even included in the roster)

Konrad

Sargent

Pefok

Sargent and Pefok haven’t performed, so others get looks here.  Striker is a form-based position on national teams.  Sometimes that is harsh but if you don’t put the ball in the back of the net consistently, you are risking your place in the team.  Pepi was the productive one on the roster in September.  He is retained and the other two are replaced by other strikers who get their chance to perform.  This makes sense for this camp even if I personally think we could have used a big, strong target forward like Pefok against Jamaica. 

However, I don’t understand Konrad’s exclusion.  With Pulisic out with an injury, the closest like for like replacement for him is Konrad.  Both are two of our best 1v1 attackers, both are comfortable with the ball at their feet and are extremely skilled dribblers capable of changing the game by themselves.  Berhalter seemed to want more verticality in this squad, explaining why Arriola was included.  That makes sense.  Not enough players on the US regularly get behind the defense.  It has been a big factor as to why the US attack has been so inefficient at times under Berhalter.  The problem with that is Berhalter is already bringing Hoppe, Weah (new inclusions this camp and both of which have this characterstic) and Aaronson (retained but one of the only players who was consistently getting in behind.  Arriola seems surplus in this area and in general the verticality thing seems to be an overcorrection.  Now it seems like we don’t have enough on-ball creators and this is something to watch out for during the games.

LESS CONTROVERSIAL “SNUBS” (Guys who have been on the fringe of the roster or mainly second or third choice selections and miss out due to form, playing time or simply because there are better options)

Miazga

Zimmerman

Cannon

Dike

Vines

Sands

I don’t have an issue with any of these exclusions.  We will cover this a little further below, but Miazga, Zimmerman and Sands are casualties of a numbers game in central defense, Sands also didn’t look good enough in midfield to warrant his inclusion over other guys in that position, Cannon isn’t getting games at Boavista and right back is one of the US’ deepest positions and Vines isn’t getting games at Liege.  Dike perhaps has a case here.  He has been playing well of late in Orlando and again, the US may have been able to use a strong target forward against Jamaica.  We will see if Berhalter regrets not having this profile forward in that game, whether it had been Pefok or Dike.

LEFT OFF / NOT RATED BY BERHALTER (Guys consistently left off, not typically included in the core group of selections for the manager at this point)

Green

CCV

EPB

Boyd

I teased this above with Miazga, Zimmerman and Sands.  Center backs have largely performed well the past 18 months with a couple exceptions like Brooks recent appearances and McKenzie in the Nations League Final.  CCV and EPB can’t break into this group because it is at this point 8 or 9 deep of players who have been playing well.  When you have 8 or 9 guys similarly rated, you are either sticking with the guys who are performing (the case with Miles and McKenzie), sticking with your top rated defender hoping he figures it out (Brooks) or calling the highest upside young defender (Richards).  It doesn’t mean Miazga, Zimmerman, CCV or EPB are bad options, but they are going to find it difficult to get calls until the current contingent either have poor performances or are injured. I know a lot of people (myself included) have found it difficult to justify Ream’s continued inclusion at this level with his age and performances the past year.  This is the position to target if you are any of the above players.  But that is one open job for five players.  Difficult situation to break in.  Green simply isn’t rated by Berhalter at this point.  Furthermore, the Roldan inclusion is for a very specific utility role off the bench for multiple positions.  Green is certainly a more technical, better attacking midfielder than Roldan, but that isn’t really the reason Roldan is included.  Green would need to be called over Luca de la Torre or Musah or McKennie and the latter two certainly aren’t happening.  You could argue Lletget would be the spot for Green and I may agree if Lletget hadn’t literally done everything he has been asked to do every time he has seen the field.  Lletget is a good soccer player.  He isn’t elite.  But he executes his assignment well.  If you are the manager, it is difficult to replace a guy who is executing the job you are asking him to execute.  Boyd has fallen far down the pecking order at this point it seems.

TOO YOUNG FOR BERHALTER / NOT READY (Players who are too inexperienced in the eyes of the manager)

Scally (note: this is according to Berhalter, not me)

Reynolds

Clark

Cowell

Otasowie

Johnny

Soto

Some controversy here.  Scally shouldn’t be in this category.  He is literally one of the most in-form American players in a top five European league at the moment.  The full back just won player of the month for one of the most storied clubs in the Bundesliga and is a locked down starter for the team.  Berhalter said he was too inexperienced, and he was looking forward to his future integration.  The problem?  How is Scally supposed to gain experience if he isn’t called in?  It defies Berhalter’s own logic.  The major note with all of these exclusions too is the fact that it doesn’t necessarily have to be zero-sum.  It’s not like calling Scally meant Berhalter had to leave Moore or Bello at home like some have said.  There is no restriction as to the amount of players a national team can call to these camps.  The only requirement is limiting the gameday squads.  Want to integrate Scally?  Bring him to camp, build chemistry, have him train with the group and learn the system.  I don’t want to make this a big deal.  The sky isn’t falling because Joe Scally wasn’t included at this point.  But this is a missed opportunity and the logic of not calling him simply doesn’t make sense.  Reynolds is likely a cross between here and the poor club situation category above.  Guys like Clark and Cowell could add some things, but I agree they are a bit too young and inexperienced for this.  A camp invite to train with the group and integrate into the system?  Sure, that would have been fine.

UNAVAILABLE DUE TO TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS / WOULDNT HAVE PLAYED (Only one guy and it’s self-explanatory)

 

Horvath

Everyone knows who our top three keepers are.  Steffen can’t travel to Panama and will stay in the States.  The backup to Turner in that game must be able to travel.  This is fine.

So, after doing this exercise, all in all there are only two guys I am really disappointed are not here: Konrad and Scally.

Arriola over Konrad baffles me. I honestly mean no disrespect but there isn’t a lot that Arriola gives you that Roldan wont.  Konrad is better out wide than both and gives the squad something different as mentioned above.

So, if you’re going to continue to call Roldan for the hard work utility player off the bench role (and I’m on the record saying “this is ok for now”) then Arriola is surplus to requirements.

On Scally, I simply disagree with Berhalter that he’s too young.  Bello is young too.  Joe Scally is less than a year younger than him and is playing at a higher level.  I think Scally is a more complete defensive player than Bello. You are more likely to get defensive mistakes out of Bello than Scally.

Not just that, the versatility makes sense for this roster.  Antonee Robinson won’t be going to Panama due to UK travel restrictions.  So, either Dest will be a defensive liability on the left or Bello will be a defenseive liability on the left against a good counter attacking team.  Having more defensive options isn’t a bad thing.

And again, this wasn’t mutually exclusive. Berhalter could have called in both AND kept all the guys he has.

But all in all, two changes isn’t bad.

I know Green is a popular snub for folks but no matter what you think of him, he isn’t the savior.  He’s a depth guy.  Why freak out about his exclusion?

The good news is there are way more exciting INCLUSIONS here than the two disappointing EXCLUSIONS.

Musah, Richards, Hoppe, Weah and Busio are all new from last camp and add interesting things to the group.

I’m excited to get another look at breakout guys like Pepi, Miles and Antonee.

We have established stars like Adams, McKennie and Dest.

It’s a good roster!  Now, let’s unite and cheer on our boys as we try to qualify for a World Cup.

 

Continue Reading

USMNT

Side by Side: The Looking at USMNT Center Back Pairings – Past & Present

Published

on

If the March 2026 window revealed anything about the United States men’s national soccer team, it’s that their center-back group, whether in a two- or three-man setup, lacks cohesion heading into the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The partnership, continuity, and communication between center backs are critical to organizing the entire defense, and right now, that foundation doesn’t look fully settled.

That realization prompted a look back over the past 40 years, examining the different center-back pairings, how they developed chemistry, and the impact those partnerships had on the USMNT at the highest level.

The Steadfast Anchor of the 1990 USMNT Defense

Mike Windischmann, captain of the 1990 USMNT World Cup team, was a cornerstone of the squad throughout the 1990 cycle. For much of that period, he was paired at center-back with Steve Trittschuh, though the two didn’t start together at the World Cup itself. Windischmann also formed defensive partnerships with John Doyle, Marcelo Balboa, and Paul Caligiuri at various points. At the World Cup, he teamed up with Jimmy Banks in two of the three matches, providing leadership and stability at the heart of the U.S. backline.

Trailblazers Building a Solid Back Line for the Future

Much like the 1990 cycle, Marcelo Balboa was a constant presence on the USMNT back line, whether playing as a sweeper under Bora Milutinović or in a back three with six midfielders in front of him under Steve Sampson. He formed key partnerships with emerging talents like Alexi Lalas, who joined the team in 1992, and dual-national Thomas Dooley. This defensive core enjoyed significant successes throughout the 1994 and 1998 cycles, including advancing out of the group stage at the 1994 World Cup, defeating Argentina at the 1995 Copa América, and taking Brazil to the brink in a hard-fought semifinal.

A Defensive Anchor in U.S. Soccer History

Widely regarded as one of the top center-backs in U.S. men’s national team history, Eddie Pope featured in three consecutive FIFA World Cups (1998, 2002, and 2006), starting in all three for the USMNT. At the 2002 tournament, he anchored a formidable back line alongside Tony Sanneh and Jeff Agoos, forming a disciplined and resilient defensive unit for the United States men’s national soccer team. That group played a key role in one of the program’s deepest modern World Cup runs, but does it stand as the best defensive unit the USMNT has ever produced?

A Peak Partnership Interrupted

For me, one of the strongest center-back pairings in United States men’s national soccer team history emerged during the 2010 cycle, anchored by Carlos Bocanegra and Oguchi Onyewu. The duo arguably reached their peak at the 2009 Confederations Cup, forming a physically dominant and well-organized backbone.

Unfortunately, Onyewu’s injury leading into the 2010 World Cup limited his effectiveness, preventing the partnership from carrying that same level into the tournament. In his absence, Jay DeMerit stepped in seamlessly, providing valuable depth and steady performances, highlighting the overall strength of the USMNT’s center-back pool during that period.

From Breakthrough to Breakdown

The center-back pairing of Omar Gonzalez and Matt Besler came together late in the 2014 cycle but quickly developed into a reliable and cohesive duo at the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Their understanding and physical presence helped stabilize the back line on the world stage.

That tournament also introduced a rising presence in John Brooks, who memorably scored the game-winning goal against Ghana after Besler picked up a knock, announcing himself in a major moment.

As the cycle turned toward 2018, Brooks continued to establish himself, often partnering with Geoff Cameron, while Gonzalez and Besler remained in the mix depending on form and fitness. However, as the 2018 cycle progressed, inconsistency and a lack of cohesion among the center-backs became an issue, one of several factors that ultimately contributed to the United States men’s national soccer team failing to qualify for the 2018 FIFA World Cup.

Emerging Stability Ahead of the 2022 World Cup

Heading into the 2022 FIFA World Cup, the United States men’s national soccer team faced real uncertainty at center back, with no clear anchor or leader emerging. That quickly changed, as Tim Ream stepped in and solidified himself as the steadying presence of the back line.

A major turning point came when Miles Robinson suffered a ruptured Achilles tendon in the summer leading up to the tournament—a significant blow given his form and importance to the group. His absence opened the door for Walker Zimmerman, who had already been in contention, to establish a strong partnership alongside Ream.

Meanwhile, Aaron Long, returning from his own Achilles injury in 2021, earned a place on the roster, and Cameron Carter-Vickers also featured, with both players contributing minutes during the tournament. Together, this group brought stability to a position that had looked unsettled just months earlier.

2026 at Center Back Uncertainty and Opportunity

There are more questions than answers surrounding the United States men’s national soccer team center-back picture heading into the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Chris Richards appears to be a near lock, while Tim Ream, though still a trusted presence, has shown signs of decline compared to four years ago, yet could still find his way onto the roster based on experience and leadership.

A key variable will be how Mauricio Pochettino sets up tactically, particularly whether he opts for a two or three center-back system. In a back three, players like Joe Scally and Alex Freeman could slide into right center-back roles given their versatility, while Mark McKenzie and Auston Trusty provide options on the left. Miles Robinson also remains firmly in the mix as competition for a roster spot.

Perhaps the biggest unknown is Noahkai Banks. The 19-year-old dual national, currently playing in the Bundesliga, opted out of a recent USMNT camp while weighing his international future between the United States and Germany. If he ultimately commits, his emergence could significantly impact the depth and ceiling of the USMNT’s center-back pool heading into 2026.

Continue Reading

USMNT

Voices of USMNT on the World Stage

Published

on

Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)

Over the decades, the United States Men’s National Soccer Team has been accompanied by a wide range of voices behind the microphone, delivering some of the most memorable calls in World Cup history.

Along the way, several standout broadcast duos have helped shape the viewing experience and left a lasting mark on the USMNT landscape.

Here’s a look back at the voices that have defined US World Cup broadcasts since 1990.

1990 FIFA World Cup – Italy 

Network: ESPN

Play-by-play: Bob Ley

Color: Paul Gardner

Coverage of the USMNT at the 1990 World Cup was limited, particularly in the early rounds, but Bob Ley emerged as one of the defining voices of soccer on U.S. television during that era. His presence helped introduce a new generation of American fans to the international game, providing context and credibility at a time when the global stage still felt unfamiliar to much of the US audience.

1994 FIFA World Cup – United States of America

1998 FIFA World Cup – France

2002 FIFA World Cup – Japan / South Korea

Networks: ABC / ESPN

Play-by-play: JP Dellacamera

Color: Ty Keough

This play-by-play and color commentary duo called three World Cups for the USMNT, becoming the defining voice of the team during my peak viewing years. Ty Keough the former USMNT midfielder from the late 1970s and early 1980s.

JP Dellacamera stands out as one of, if not the, best play-by-play announcers and remains one of my favorites. While others on this list delivered memorable moments, they didn’t quite match that same level of longevity.

2006 FIFA World Cup – Germany 

Networks: ABC / ESPN

Play-by-play: Dave O’Brien

Color: Marcelo Balboa

New England native Dave O’Brien, widely known today for calling major sports across his career, had just one World Cup as the primary play-by-play voice for the USMNT. His run calling USMNT matches, primarily in the mid-2000s on ESPN, was relatively brief but still memorable. While he isn’t as closely associated with the USMNT as some other broadcasters, he was behind the mic for several standout moments during that era.

2010 FIFA World Cup – South Korea

Network: ESPN

Play-by-play: Ian Darke

Color: John Harkes

Ian Darke brought a global voice to American audiences as the lead play-by-play announcer for the USMNT during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Already well known around the world, he made the tournament easy to connect with for U.S. fans and delivered one of the most iconic calls in American soccer history.

Darke’s iconic call of the USMNT game winning goal by Landon Donovan in must win final group stage match against Algeria to advance to the knockout stage of the 2010 World Cup gives me chills every time I see it.

2014 FIFA World Cup – Brazil 

Networks: ESPN / ABC

Play-by-play: Ian Darke

Color: Taylor Twellman

This duo might be my favorite to date. Ian Darke brought a clear, global voice to USMNT viewers during the 2014 FIFA World Cup, making the tournament easy to follow for US fans while elevating the biggest moments with calm, sharp, and memorable calls.

Alongside him, Taylor Twellman emerged as one of the most recognizable and influential voices of the modern era, primarily as a lead analyst on ESPN. His passionate, unfiltered style stood out, most notably with his unforgettable “What are we doing?!” reaction following the USMNT’s failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, a moment that’s still talked about today.

2022 FIFA World Cup – Qatar

Network: FOX Sports

Play-by-play: John Strong

Color: Stu Holden

If the USMNT had qualified for the 2018 World Cup, this broadcast team would have called their matches, marking what would have been a third straight World Cup cycle with the same primary commentary crew. It’s also likely he’ll be paired again with Stu Holden for USMNT matches at the 2026 World Cup.

John Strong has served as a lead play-by-play voice for U.S. soccer on FOX Sports since 2018, bringing a modern, high-energy style to the booth. Since taking on major international assignments, he’s become one of the defining voices for USMNT audiences in top competitions, known for his clear, sharp calls and a big-game tone that fits the moment.

Continue Reading

Club News

The Expanding Impact of MLS on the World Cup

Published

on

The growth and success of Major League Soccer has led to more players from around the world representing MLS at the World Cup, with this summer’s tournament expected to feature the highest total yet.

1998 was the first World Cup played after the launch of Major League Soccer. Here’s a breakdown of MLS-based players on World Cup rosters by year:

1998 – 18 (T-8th)
Tied with Liga MX for 8th most. This would the first and only time the USMNT World Cup roster  

2002 – 11 (18th)
All 11 were from the USMNT

2006 – 15 (14th)
11 of the 15 were #USMNT players.

2010 – 6 (25th)
The lowest total to date. Only 6 MLS players, with 4 on the USMNT. This coincided with the peak of US players based in Europe.

2014 – 21 (10th)
Less than half were USMNT players, though the US still led the way the 10 most notably DeAndre Yedlin (20) getting the call.

2018 – 18 (11th)
This number likely would’ve been significantly higher had the USMNT qualified, potentially pushing MLS into the top 7–8 leagues.

2022 – 36 (6th)
The highest total yet, just behind Ligue 1 for 5th. Also worth noting, rosters expanded from 23 to 26 players for this tournament and the first time that the USA didn’t have the most players 

Overall, the trend shows steady growth in MLS representation, both domestically and internationally.

MLS Pipeline Continues for the USMNT

It’s rare for a World Cup–qualified nation not to have a strong share of its players featured across tournament rosters. Canada was a recent exception in 2022, though their ties to MLS remain significant with multiple clubs in the league.

With roster selection less than a month away, it’s reasonable to expect that roughly a third of the #USMNT squad will come from MLS. Below is a positional breakdown of the MLS players Mauricio Pochettino has called in during his tenure as USMNT manager.

Goalkeepers

The USMNT is set to start an MLS-based goalkeeper at a World Cup for the first time, with all of the top options currently playing in MLS.

Chris Brady is one of the goalkeepers I’m most excited to watch in the coming cycles. He’s been performing at a high level in Major League Soccer and looks like a strong candidate to fill the long-term role as the USMNT’s primary starter over the next few cycles.

Chris Brady
Roman Celentano
Matt Freese
Patrick Schulte
Matt Turner

Defenders

Veteran center-backs Tim Ream and Miles Robinson seem likely to be selected with Blackmon a possibility depending on the health of the remaining pool. Arfsten seems to be almost a lock due to his ability to attack and create scoring chances with his crosses from the wing.

Max Arfsten
Tristan Blackmon
Tim Ream
Miles Robinson

Midfielders

The USMNT has strong depth in midfield, and Mauricio Pochettino’s recent roster selections suggest he’ll likely round out the squad with some of the players listed below.

One of the biggest gaps in this USMNT roster is the true dynamic, creative spark in the attacking third. Diego Luna stands out in that role, capable of unsettling defenses, breaking lines, and changing the rhythm of a match. He’s exactly the type of player who could thrive in a super-sub role, coming on against tired legs and making an impact at this summer’s World Cup.

Sebastian Berhalter
Diego Luna
Jack McGlynn
Cristian Roldan
Timothy Tillman

Forwards

Striker may be the toughest position for the MLS group to crack the #USMNT World Cup roster, but Brian White is making a strong case, scoring eight goals in his first nine MLS matches at the time of writing.

Brian White is a highly productive, “old-school” style striker for the USMNT, known for his elite positioning, relentless work rate, and ability to finish in a variety of ways. That combination makes him a strong option as a striker off the bench, where he could be especially dangerous against tired defenses at this summer’s World Cup.

Paxten Aaronson
Josh Sargent
Brian White

MLS Representation in the USMNT Player Pool

Since 1998, the last time the majority of a USMNT World Cup roster was composed primarily of MLS-based players, it has become increasingly clear that a meaningful portion of the squad still comes from MLS. Consistently, roughly 30–40% of the roster has been drawn from the domestic league, reflecting a long-standing and relatively stable trend in player selection over time which I don’t seen changing anytime soon.

Continue Reading

Trending