USMNT
What to learn from the 2014 France squad?
Published
9 years agoon
First, the US is not France and the US is not close to being France on the soccer field yet. However, Patrick Evra’s ugly sending off in reaction to a Marseille fan before a game reminded me of that 2010 disastrous French team. I was in Cape Town opening weekend and remember clearly that team falling apart.
In 2010 at South Africa things went from bad to worse for the talented French squad. It began back in qualifications after an embarrassing win over Ireland which included a handball by legendary forward Theirry Henry. It got worst once they arrived and began the tournament. Captain Nicolas Anelka was sent home after a verbal assault on then coach Raymond Demenech following a 2-0 loss to Mexico. This was followed by a series of scandals off the field including child prostitution. In response to Anelka’s send off, a mutiny was organized by the team against their coach with the entire squad refusing to practice. That was packaged with only managing a single goal through the loss to Mexico, a draw with Uruguay and a horrible loss to host South Africa. The French fans were so disgusted with their team many in attendance cheered for South Africa in the final installment. Demenech added to the mess by refusing to shake hands with the South African manager after the game and was promptly fired after the tournament.
Their embarrassment in the 2010 World Cup in South Africa is on an entirely different scale, though I do wonder if a mutiny may have happened at some point under Jurgen Klinsmann. France has much greater expectations and much more talent, but certainly there are some similarities to the anger and frustration in France as we are feeling in the US after an embarrassing failure. I think there are lessons the US can learn from how France handled the 2010 team and built to a much more successful 2014 campaign.
Qualification Red Flags
The French team stumbled into the World Cup qualifying thanks to the dubious Henry hand ball. Many wonder if would have been better had France not even qualified. This ugly stumble was similar to the US poor performance, firing coach Jurgen Klinsmann and even the questionable goal eliminating the US reminded me of this French team.
Perhaps, even as embarrassing as it was and is, that it is best for US soccer that they did not qualify. A lesson learned may be a heightened awareness of a teams mentality. After Jurgen Klinsmann was replaced Arena was put in a very difficult situation and utilized a similar lineup to what Jurgen had. Perhaps then a larger change of players could and should have happened earlier. Hindsight makes my job easy, but having seen both lessons I am convinced that new leadership and blood were required.
France cleaned house
The positive impact of past good feelings from success starting back in the 1998 World Cup victory quickly disappeared after the 2010 blow out. The French Football Federation President resigned his post immediately following the tournament. The French people were indifferent to the coach being fired and President stepping down, they demanded answers from individual players. Their were massive disciplinary sweeps and the leaders of the mutiny were purged from the squad. The French team that showed up in 2014 only retaining four players from the 2010 squad and those few had been cleared of wrong doing in 2010.
There is no need for disciplinary action and losing is certainly not the same as mutiny and the other short comings that 2010 French team had, but I do think a clean sweep is needed. Firing Arena was necessary, but there is more changes needed. The US need a new direction at President, Sunil Gulati didn’t step down, but he shouldn’t run for reelection. There should be major changes on the field as well as all the way down to the youth system.
Young Guns
The French team that arrived in 2014 was an extremely fresh team and very young. There was very little tournament experience on the team. However, they still managed to erase the 2010 memories with a fantastic campaign ending in the quarterfinals in a 1-0 loss to eventual champions Germany. They built off of that tournament and thirteen from that roster led a successful 2016 Euros. The team dominated the tournament including avenging their World Cup loss defeating Germany 2-0 in the semi-final before a difficult loss to Portugal 1-0 in the European final.
As for the US not having the World Cup next year gives us even more incentive to start young now. Again the United States is not France, they don’t have the young talent France does, however the US did have strong campaigns from both our U20 and U17 squads. None of the games for the next year will be meaningful. It’s time to start fresh and begin utilizing a young group that can be developed over the next five years. There are key positions like goalkeeper, left back, left wing and striker that are light on talent. This is the time to develop those positions.
Only a handful of young players should be retained from Bruce’s most recent rosters including Bobby Wood, Paul Arriola, Christian Pulisic, John Brooks and DeAndre Yedlin. The US need a change in leadership and that includes on the field – guys like Jozy Altidore and Michael Bradley should be considered old guard and the US needs to move on. Clint Dempsey should be allowed to play for his records, but in a limited capacity.
Turning it Around
France turned it completely around in 2014 and developed a young squad that performed well both in the tournament and in the Euros only a few years later. The United States isn’t France on the field or in its youth developed, but there are definitely lessons to learn from this great turn around.
Arena is gone and there’s the USSF election is months away. The next five years have started and there could have sweeping changes on the field, in the youth programs and in leadership. The time is now to begin those changes and develop a young group for a run at 2022.
You may like
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
Over the decades, the United States Men’s National Soccer Team has been accompanied by a wide range of voices behind the microphone, delivering some of the most memorable calls in World Cup history.
Along the way, several standout broadcast duos have helped shape the viewing experience and left a lasting mark on the USMNT landscape.
Here’s a look back at the voices that have defined US World Cup broadcasts since 1990.
1990 FIFA World Cup – Italy
Network: ESPN
Play-by-play: Bob Ley
Color: Paul Gardner
Coverage of the USMNT at the 1990 World Cup was limited, particularly in the early rounds, but Bob Ley emerged as one of the defining voices of soccer on U.S. television during that era. His presence helped introduce a new generation of American fans to the international game, providing context and credibility at a time when the global stage still felt unfamiliar to much of the US audience.
1994 FIFA World Cup – United States of America
1998 FIFA World Cup – France
2002 FIFA World Cup – Japan / South Korea
Networks: ABC / ESPN
Play-by-play: JP Dellacamera
Color: Ty Keough
This play-by-play and color commentary duo called three World Cups for the USMNT, becoming the defining voice of the team during my peak viewing years. Ty Keough the former USMNT midfielder from the late 1970s and early 1980s.
JP Dellacamera stands out as one of, if not the, best play-by-play announcers and remains one of my favorites. While others on this list delivered memorable moments, they didn’t quite match that same level of longevity.
2006 FIFA World Cup – Germany
Networks: ABC / ESPN
Play-by-play: Dave O’Brien
Color: Marcelo Balboa
New England native Dave O’Brien, widely known today for calling major sports across his career, had just one World Cup as the primary play-by-play voice for the USMNT. His run calling USMNT matches, primarily in the mid-2000s on ESPN, was relatively brief but still memorable. While he isn’t as closely associated with the USMNT as some other broadcasters, he was behind the mic for several standout moments during that era.
2010 FIFA World Cup – South Korea
Network: ESPN
Play-by-play: Ian Darke
Color: John Harkes
Ian Darke brought a global voice to American audiences as the lead play-by-play announcer for the USMNT during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Already well known around the world, he made the tournament easy to connect with for U.S. fans and delivered one of the most iconic calls in American soccer history.
Darke’s iconic call of the USMNT game winning goal by Landon Donovan in must win final group stage match against Algeria to advance to the knockout stage of the 2010 World Cup gives me chills every time I see it.
2014 FIFA World Cup – Brazil
Networks: ESPN / ABC
Play-by-play: Ian Darke
Color: Taylor Twellman
This duo might be my favorite to date. Ian Darke brought a clear, global voice to USMNT viewers during the 2014 FIFA World Cup, making the tournament easy to follow for US fans while elevating the biggest moments with calm, sharp, and memorable calls.
Alongside him, Taylor Twellman emerged as one of the most recognizable and influential voices of the modern era, primarily as a lead analyst on ESPN. His passionate, unfiltered style stood out, most notably with his unforgettable “What are we doing?!” reaction following the USMNT’s failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, a moment that’s still talked about today.
2022 FIFA World Cup – Qatar
Network: FOX Sports
Play-by-play: John Strong
Color: Stu Holden
If the USMNT had qualified for the 2018 World Cup, this broadcast team would have called their matches, marking what would have been a third straight World Cup cycle with the same primary commentary crew. It’s also likely he’ll be paired again with Stu Holden for USMNT matches at the 2026 World Cup.
John Strong has served as a lead play-by-play voice for U.S. soccer on FOX Sports since 2018, bringing a modern, high-energy style to the booth. Since taking on major international assignments, he’s become one of the defining voices for USMNT audiences in top competitions, known for his clear, sharp calls and a big-game tone that fits the moment.
The growth and success of Major League Soccer has led to more players from around the world representing MLS at the World Cup, with this summer’s tournament expected to feature the highest total yet.
1998 was the first World Cup played after the launch of Major League Soccer. Here’s a breakdown of MLS-based players on World Cup rosters by year:
1998 – 18 (T-8th)
Tied with Liga MX for 8th most. This would the first and only time the USMNT World Cup roster
2002 – 11 (18th)
All 11 were from the USMNT
2006 – 15 (14th)
11 of the 15 were #USMNT players.
2010 – 6 (25th)
The lowest total to date. Only 6 MLS players, with 4 on the USMNT. This coincided with the peak of US players based in Europe.
2014 – 21 (10th)
Less than half were USMNT players, though the US still led the way the 10 most notably DeAndre Yedlin (20) getting the call.
2018 – 18 (11th)
This number likely would’ve been significantly higher had the USMNT qualified, potentially pushing MLS into the top 7–8 leagues.
2022 – 36 (6th)
The highest total yet, just behind Ligue 1 for 5th. Also worth noting, rosters expanded from 23 to 26 players for this tournament and the first time that the USA didn’t have the most players
Overall, the trend shows steady growth in MLS representation, both domestically and internationally.
MLS Pipeline Continues for the USMNT
It’s rare for a World Cup–qualified nation not to have a strong share of its players featured across tournament rosters. Canada was a recent exception in 2022, though their ties to MLS remain significant with multiple clubs in the league.
With roster selection less than a month away, it’s reasonable to expect that roughly a third of the #USMNT squad will come from MLS. Below is a positional breakdown of the MLS players Mauricio Pochettino has called in during his tenure as USMNT manager.
Goalkeepers
The USMNT is set to start an MLS-based goalkeeper at a World Cup for the first time, with all of the top options currently playing in MLS.
Chris Brady is one of the goalkeepers I’m most excited to watch in the coming cycles. He’s been performing at a high level in Major League Soccer and looks like a strong candidate to fill the long-term role as the USMNT’s primary starter over the next few cycles.
Chris Brady
Roman Celentano
Matt Freese
Patrick Schulte
Matt Turner
Defenders
Veteran center-backs Tim Ream and Miles Robinson seem likely to be selected with Blackmon a possibility depending on the health of the remaining pool. Arfsten seems to be almost a lock due to his ability to attack and create scoring chances with his crosses from the wing.
Max Arfsten
Tristan Blackmon
Tim Ream
Miles Robinson
Midfielders
The USMNT has strong depth in midfield, and Mauricio Pochettino’s recent roster selections suggest he’ll likely round out the squad with some of the players listed below.
One of the biggest gaps in this USMNT roster is the true dynamic, creative spark in the attacking third. Diego Luna stands out in that role, capable of unsettling defenses, breaking lines, and changing the rhythm of a match. He’s exactly the type of player who could thrive in a super-sub role, coming on against tired legs and making an impact at this summer’s World Cup.
Sebastian Berhalter
Diego Luna
Jack McGlynn
Cristian Roldan
Timothy Tillman
Forwards
Striker may be the toughest position for the MLS group to crack the #USMNT World Cup roster, but Brian White is making a strong case, scoring eight goals in his first nine MLS matches at the time of writing.
Brian White is a highly productive, “old-school” style striker for the USMNT, known for his elite positioning, relentless work rate, and ability to finish in a variety of ways. That combination makes him a strong option as a striker off the bench, where he could be especially dangerous against tired defenses at this summer’s World Cup.
Paxten Aaronson
Josh Sargent
Brian White
MLS Representation in the USMNT Player Pool
Since 1998, the last time the majority of a USMNT World Cup roster was composed primarily of MLS-based players, it has become increasingly clear that a meaningful portion of the squad still comes from MLS. Consistently, roughly 30–40% of the roster has been drawn from the domestic league, reflecting a long-standing and relatively stable trend in player selection over time which I don’t seen changing anytime soon.
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
In light of the recent resignation of Matt Crocker, I revisited something I wrote nearly a decade ago, an early attempt to capture what I called the “Dark Decades of US Soccer.” At the time, the piece was overly long and packed with detail—probably more than today’s audience would stick with.
But buried in that work were meaningful patterns, clear, recurring behaviors that shaped how the federation operated more than 60 years ago. What stood out most, looking back now, is how familiar some of those patterns still feel today.
So, I went back, stripped the piece down, and pulled out the most relevant sections, those that highlight the parallels between past and present. The goal isn’t to draw conclusions for you, but to put those similarities side by side and let you decide: how much has really changed?
World Cup Momentum to the First American Soccer Boom
Photo of Pele at the 1966 World Cup
Photograph: AP Photo
After the success and popularity of the 1966 World Cup which saw over one million viewers of the tournament many America investors saw the vision and believed that there was the market for soccer in the United States and Canada.
The investors moved very quickly and in 1967 there were two American professional leagues making their debuts the USSFA-sanctioned United Soccer Association (USA) and the independent National Professional Soccer League (NPSL).
These leagues would only last one year and be merged at the request of FIFA into the North American Soccer League (NASL) kicking off in 1968 and relying on mainly on foreign talent. The American investors believed building the interest in soccer in the US would have a direct impact on the growth and performance of the US Men’s National team which and of course more money for the investors and federation.
First Attempt at Modernizing the USMNT
Phil Woosnam, in 1977 as the commissioner of the NASL.
Photograph: AP Photo
Off the back of the success of the inaugural NASL season, the U.S. Soccer Federation appointed Phil Woosnam, fresh off leading the Atlanta Chiefs to a championship and earning Coach of the Year honors, to take charge of the U.S. Men’s National Team.
Woosnam immediately shifted the structure of the program. Instead of a player pool selected by committee, he pushed decision-making toward the coaching staff, allowing selections to be based on performance and fit rather than geography or internal bias. The move was not universally welcomed, and it reportedly created friction with members of the federation’s leadership.
With professional players now more fully available, Woosnam’s approach helped assemble what was widely considered the strongest possible squad at the time. He also introduced organized training camps ahead of friendlies and World Cup qualifiers, an uncommon practice in that era, but one that clearly improved cohesion and preparation. Those changes contributed to the U.S. advancing further in World Cup qualifying than it had in previous cycles.
By early 1969, the USMNT appeared to be building real momentum toward a potential place in the 1970 World Cup. However, tensions between Woosnam and the federation began to escalate. Frustrated with compensation issues and growing interference from the USSF in team operations, Woosnam stepped away from the national team in the spring of 1969. become commissioner of the NASL.
Following his departure, assistant coach Gordon Jago took over as manager. His tenure began under difficult circumstances, with not being able to set up pre-qualifying friendlies, an important part of the progress made under Woosnam along with interference from USSF board members as it related to roster selection which created instability and morale issues on the field. The USMNT struggled in qualifying and ultimately fell short, losing both matches to Haiti, a team they had previously been competitive with in a series of friendlies in 1968.
The Crocker Era: Coaching Chaos and Course Corrections
Photo of Cindy Parlow Cone, Gregg Berhalter, Matt Crocker and JT Batson
Photograph: AP Photo/Lucas Peliter
It’s been roughly three years since the Matt Crocker era began at U.S. Soccer, when he stepped in as Sporting Director, replacing Earnie Stewart.
One of Crocker’s first major responsibilities was hiring the next U.S. Men’s National Team manager. In the previous cycle, the federation had reportedly operated with a narrow set of internal criteria, preferences widely believed to favor English-speaking and American candidates, which significantly limited the coaching pool and shaped the direction of the search.
Roughly two months later, during the Concacaf Nations League semifinal window, it was announced that Gregg Berhalter would be reappointed as USMNT head coach. The decision caught many around the program and in the media off guard, raising questions about how the process had ultimately unfolded.
More recently, in an interview with GiveMeSport, Jesse Marsch stated he was effectively told he was set to become the next USMNT head coach in the late spring of 2023, only for that opportunity to be withdrawn at the last moment, a shift that reportedly had ripple effects on a potential move to Leicester City that was nearing completion.
The abrupt reversal and eventual rehiring of Berhalter has been widely attributed to a mix of factors, including rumored influence from within the player pool, with U.S. Soccer ultimately reversing course. Roughly a year later, after a disappointing Copa América campaign on home soil, Berhalter was dismissed.
Crocker’s second opportunity to reset the program took a different direction. He first secured the high-profile appointment of Emma Hayes, one of the most accomplished managers in women’s football, to lead the USWNT. That move was followed by the hiring of Mauricio Pochettino for the USMNT, a tenure that has delivered mixed early results and will ultimately be judged through the lens of the 2026 World Cup on home soil but truly disappointed that Crocker wouldn’t see through what he helped build, and you have to ask yourself why?
Voices of USMNT on the World Stage
The Expanding Impact of MLS on the World Cup
The More Things Change, The More They Remain the Same
Trending
- Club News2 years ago
American Transfers: Stock Up & Stock Down
- USMNT2 years ago
USMNT Kits Come in Different Styles and Colors
- Club News6 years ago
CJ dos Santos, Benfica
- USMNT6 years ago
A Hidden Gem: Barça Residency Academy
- Club News6 years ago
Julian Vincente Araujo
- USMNT3 years ago
World Cup Format History
- USMNT2 years ago
Is the MLS Specifically Targeting Expansion to USL Cities?
- MLS4 years ago
2022 Youth Series: MLS Club Youth Talent Rankings