USMNT
The Curious Case of Gregg Berhalter
Published
3 years agoon
Gregg Berhalter’s contract has expired and we’re unsure of the next move for the manager or the US Men’s National Team. Jurgen Klinsmann and Bruce Arena left little to the imagination when they each lost their position as USMNT managers. They had not been able to qualify for the World Cup in 2018 out of CONCACAF and in Arena’s case not been able to even secure a draw against a lowly Trinidad and Tobago side. Berhalter is a much more interesting position with a network of converging storylines that make for intriguing decisions for both parties.
What did Gregg do and how will he be measured? What does USSF want to knowing they are hosting the World Cup and will have an incredibly talented team to build from for a 2026 run.
Qualifying & Expectations
Gregg was hired at a time when the US had failed to qualify for the world cup out of CONCACAF. After failing to qualify a number of US fan bases and independent media were born and grew out of the frustration of this experience. Scuffed Podcast, Underdog Soccer Podcast, Tactical Manager and 11Yanks are all core mediums that were born of and have grown a tremendous following in the wake of missing 2018.
Alexi Lalas had mentioned early in the process that this was the greatest group of American players assembled and expectations would be high for the new manager. There were trophies earned across the pool, Pulisic had some great moments in HUGE games for Chelsea, Weston McKennie was establishing himself as a key piece for Juventus in Italy, Tyler Adams and Brenden Aaronson at Leeds, a backline duo of Antonee Robinson and Tim Ream at Fulham, Tim Weah in France and Gio Reyna, the wonder kid, at Dortmund, Yunus Musah and Sergiño Dest in Spain (followed by Italy for Dest). The list goes on and on. The argument however, has been – how essential are these players for these key clubs. Are they scoring goals and providing true attacking impact in their roles? Can we produce a striker who can score to finish off goals in this talented pool of supporting attacking players?
The USMNT finished third and qualified for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Ultimately they qualified, but they were dominated by Canada drawing their first match at home and losing to an under manned Canadian team away. Though they defeated Mexico in qualifying, they finished below them in the standings as they were unable to put away some of their weaker opponents. It could have easily gone very differently either way during qualifying. The US should have scored to defeat El Salvador in their opener and looked desperately disorganized against Panama through most of the match before a halftime lineup change and Pepi’s substitution likely changed the course of qualifing and Berhalter’s legacy.
Gregg built a successful defensive side, that allowed very few goals during qualifying and played to Tyler Adam’s strengths gobbling up most of opposing teams threats through qualifying. The team struggled to score, identify a striker and find ways to score goals for three years. The inability to figure this out was apparent early and brought up by Gregg after the US’ loss to Holland.
Young & Inexperienced Group
The roster that Berhalter took on needed to be completely overhauled. There were very few pieces worth keeping from the previous cycle of an aged MLS retirement squad. However there was a tremendous young crop of extremely promising players coming up in the wake of the 2018 failure.
The minimal expectation was qualification and debate has raged over how challenging that process truly is for CONCACAF. This allowed for more of a microscope on Gregg’s tenure than many coaches ahead of their takeover had faced. Gregg’s mind was on regaining US presence and achieving World Cup qualification, but many fans strived for and demanded more. The quality of the talent he inherited were achieving historic success in Europe’s top leagues, Champions League and making a name for themselves at the highest levels of world football. They are also extremely young, Tyler Adams was the youngest captain at the tournament and the team was 2nd youngest at the tournament (25.2 years). That average was slightly higher in the tournament than it had been (<25 years) during qualifying, in their October qualifier against Costa Rica they had an average age of 22.2.

The debate on the talent level has raged for years. Very few players through qualifying and the tournament had ever experienced a World Cup, many had been a part of a qualifying cycle. Did this play a part in their success or failure? All this experience discussion not to mention that their leader Gregg himself had never managed internationally, never led or been a part of leading World Cup qualifying off the pitch.
During this qualifying process many questions around the US roster call ups were brought up. Gregg was extremely slow to retire players from his pool that were apparent to not be key contributors to the group especially glaring were players like Jackson Yueill, Sebastian Lletget and Aaron Long, who was included on the World Cup roster. Jesus Ferreira looked unready for the position of 9 this cycle, but was included anyway and showed poorly in the 45 minutes he was given in Qatar.
Further playing into this debate was the pool itself. Sergiño Dest selected the United States of America over pursuing an opportunity with Holland. Yunus Musah was eligible for Ghana, England and Italy, however he makes a shocking decision to play for the US. Was this the work of the Brian McBride, GM hired to help with internationals or Gregg’s personal efforts to build relationships with players and prospects players? Perhaps also encouraging his players to reach out to these dual nationals. There are enough rumors and personal stories that confirm Gregg was involved in several dual nationals decisions to make the case for his value there. This was perhaps his most impactful moves as a manager. Musah was part of the central midfield nicknamed “MMA”. This trio were immensenly impactful, critical even, to the US success and the best central midfield collective I’ve seen play.
The players had some learning experiences along the way. Weston McKennie in particular during World Cup qualifying got himself into trouble breaking protocol and was sent home. This was hugely debated at the time and questions galore, but has since clearly shown to be handled well. McKennie himself has praised how the situation was handled and Gregg restored McKennie to the lineup.
“I’m glad we’re addressing this right away. Because when this thing happened, we stressed the importance of us having a young team, people making mistakes and people being held accountable for their mistakes. And that’s exactly what it was and what it is,” Berhalter said.
For the most part Berhalter had a relatively successful brand with his core players who continued on the roster. However many fans have continued to wonder through rumors and other places how great Gregg’s relationship was with all players. John Brooks name and curious legacy has been dragged for two years now since he was dropped from WCQ and inexplicably been left out. Others like Matt Miazga have hinted at some future stories that may emerge once Gregg is no longer the manager.
A bizarre interaction with Gregg and media regarding Haji Wright after 45 minutes in June.
Additionally, Gregg caused unnecessary drama after the World Cup when he made comments at an event that was tied to Gio Reyna. This came at the time the Athletic was releasing a story around Reyna’s limited minutes and the reporting they had to why this was happening. Reyna will certainly be one of the rising stars in the 2026 cycle and widely considered one of the best American young players in Europe. That could lead to some challenges for Berhalter’s selection as a manager with the young star.
Gio Reyna on Instagram in response to Gregg Berhalter’s comments and reports he was nearly sent home from Qatar for his behavior in-camp. pic.twitter.com/n4UJqN7JMl
— Men in Blazers (@MenInBlazers) December 12, 2022
One final area that was noticeable during his tenure was his rare ownership of losses or failures. After the loss to Canada, Gregg was demolished by the media for saying that the US dominated Canada in a 0-2 loss.
“I think it was an entire team effort that was outstanding,” Berhalter said. “We asked them to be dominant, we asked them to embrace the conditions, embrace the physicality of going and I think we did that and more.
“It’s hard for me to remember a performance away from home this dominant without getting a result.”
After losing to Holland, instead of owning it as a manager and identifying the defensive weaknesses of his own side; he leaned into his striker problems:
WHAT THEY SAID: “We don’t have a Memphis Depay right now, who’s scoring in the Champions League,” Berhalter proclaimed, despite Memphis never scoring a Champions League goal since joining Barcelona. “[The Netherlands] were clinical in their [scoring] opportunities in the first half. Other than that, there wasn’t much separating the teams.”
Ironically many fans pointed out we have more statistically successful players in Europe and Holland’s manager Louis van Gaal pointed to tactical failures on the manager’s part.
‘Team USA didn’t adjust, they didn’t adapt,’ he said. ‘We based a tactical plan on that [targeting the flanks] that probably allowed us to win. ‘
Success
All the above is for not if a manager isn’t successful on the field of battle. Fair or not, that is how all managers are ultimately weighed. The challenge for USSF and for fans is what is the measure of success. Gregg came into the position with debatable success to begin with. Many fans were excited to see a coach who had taken a small market club with no budget into the playoffs. Others saw a manager who had failed and been fired in Europe and never won anything domestically.
Preparation for World Cup qualifying, building a roster, building a system – execution and quality for wins, bringing the locker room together under a shared vision and belief. These are difficult things to break down and measure in a manager, but let’s look at the body of work.
In preperation for World Cup qualifying it was a mixed bag of reactions to roster selections and style of play, but success against rival Mexico cannot be debated. The US defeated Mexico three times in 2021, winning the Nations League (one of the best feelings of the cycle for me), the Gold Cup (with our B team) and defeating Mexico at home with a classic and deeply meaningful 2-0 scoreline in World Cup qualifying.

Making Mexico is a CONCACAF minnow
— Ethan Zombek (@eszombek) December 15, 2022
The debate of course here, lies in seeing Mexico’s body of work for the year and their poor performance at the World Cup. This was clearly not the Mexico of old, missing key players and their young prospects not panning out as quality as the young Americans had. In addition, not scoring goals and the two defeats to Canada hurt Berhalter’s body of work.
Gregg struggled with in game tactics his entire tenure. He rarely made the right impact substitution or lacked what seemed to be the right tactical changes in those critical manager minutes from 60-80 to make any case that he had a good feel for the game, his subs were limited but often due to his own roster selection or lack of development errors and he rarely tactically how managed his opponent once they had the opportunity to engage.
That all said, Gregg helped the USMNT qualify for the World Cup. This is ultimately the most critical piece of manager responsibility in World Cup Qualifying is to qualify. The Italians amongst many other nations would gladly take a last place spot to have been included in the 2022 tournament. However, the qualifying process didnt appear to grant Gregg the opportunity to solve one of his most glaring issues on the attacking side of the ball.
At the World Cup the US missed a golden opportunity to defeat Wales. The draw came of all things, on a defensive error that led to a penalty. The US looked strong against England achieving a draw once again, though at times looking the more dangerous and better side – especially in the midfield. Giving the Captain arm band to Adams, helping Weston McKennie navigate breaking team rules and recruiting Yunus Musah perhaps making Berhalter’s decision making important here. These two results however led a very talented team to a must win game against Iran which they ultimately did win 1-0. It was once again a debated result. The job of a team in a tournament is to move on yes, but many fans felt it was unconvincing and the inability to win against Wales forced Berhalter to play a tired starting XI too many minutes.
The US lost in the first group stage to the Netherlands 3-1. Not a side that is embarrassing to lose to, but certainly a scoreline not indicative of a strong defensive minded manager. The goals against were not prolific, but often missed assignments, perhaps from tired legs. The US had opportunity to draw this game down 2-1 after scoring to get in the game there were missed chances. Who is to blame? The debate rages on, but ultimately a win against Iran and two draws are what Berhalter’s young side come home with.
Next Steps
The US have increased their Elo ranking, remained undefeated against England and dominated Mexico in 2021. As stated above perhaps Berhalter’s biggest accomplishment was his potential involvement in the dual national recruitment arena. The team structure and culture overall seemed to be solid, though as pointed out above plenty of cracks in the walls. Most of the key items pointed out in Bob Morocco’s response below:
Pro’s:
— Bob Morocco (@bob_morocco) December 14, 2022
-Overall Good Results: moved the USMNT from an Elo ranking in the 30s to the 20s. Largely better results than past managers against all level of opponent.
-Dual National Recruitment: Dest and Musah alone are hugely valuable.
-Defensive Structure: both in possession and… https://t.co/ncWLUM42mI
What ultimately does the US want to look like and what are they planning and hoping to accomplish in 2026?
Gregg’s tactical strength were improving the defensive identity in the US, however in a few critical games we seemed to give key goals or make defensive errors (2-0 loss to Canada, 3-1 loss to Holland). Few of the backline will likely be part of a 2026 run – Dest, Antonee Robinson are likely, Joe Scally could be competing and it is likely Cameron Carter-Vickers and possibly Walker Zimmerman could compete at CB. It’ll be on the attacking side of our game we’ll need to improve and this area has not been Gregg’s strength. Gregg didn’t show a strong in game tactical management to make crucial changes that would shift the course of a game in the way we’ll need to make a deep run.
Gregg was a fantastic dual national recruiter and that was critical, how many more dual nationals are out there and can McBride with a new manager and a strong model replicate this? That will be difficult to measure and assess. Gregg’s cracks and flaws showed both in his commentary and some of his relationships. He often gave preference to domestic camp players and hung on to poor performers past when the player was losing their traction even in their own clubs. The lack of depth showed in the World Cup and would need improvement for a 2026 run.
Gregg has won Nations League and Gold Cup, but has few international successes or trophies, nor any improvement in is resume to show that he would have the caliber or tactics to really shift the mindset of even is existing players on how to level up from where they have performed. Few of even our top players outside of perhaps Christian Pulisic and Tyler Adams showed even as much of the qualities they’ve possed for their club for the national team.
For all the positives many fans have on Gregg Berhalter certainly the gap between good and great was apparent to all. Perhaps event to Gregg himself, who may want to pat himself on the back, say job well done and return to his favored club coaching career.
Can the US draw and inspire a successful international or touted club tournament manager into making a go of a run with the USMNT fan base and the host nation marketing that will come for that manager? Certainly that won’t inspire a top club manager, but may provide additional funding to make the pay competitive and the spotlight of a massive sports nation interest to glory seekers. The answer to that will define what’s next.
You may like
The growth and success of Major League Soccer has led to more players from around the world representing MLS at the World Cup, with this summer’s tournament expected to feature the highest total yet.
1998 was the first World Cup played after the launch of Major League Soccer. Here’s a breakdown of MLS-based players on World Cup rosters by year:
1998 – 18 (T-8th)
Tied with Liga MX for 8th most. This would the first and only time the USMNT World Cup roster
2002 – 11 (18th)
All 11 were from the USMNT
2006 – 15 (14th)
11 of the 15 were #USMNT players.
2010 – 6 (25th)
The lowest total to date. Only 6 MLS players, with 4 on the USMNT. This coincided with the peak of US players based in Europe.
2014 – 21 (10th)
Less than half were USMNT players, though the US still led the way the 10 most notably DeAndre Yedlin (20) getting the call.
2018 – 18 (11th)
This number likely would’ve been significantly higher had the USMNT qualified, potentially pushing MLS into the top 7–8 leagues.
2022 – 36 (6th)
The highest total yet, just behind Ligue 1 for 5th. Also worth noting, rosters expanded from 23 to 26 players for this tournament and the first time that the USA didn’t have the most players
Overall, the trend shows steady growth in MLS representation, both domestically and internationally.
MLS Pipeline Continues for the USMNT
It’s rare for a World Cup–qualified nation not to have a strong share of its players featured across tournament rosters. Canada was a recent exception in 2022, though their ties to MLS remain significant with multiple clubs in the league.
With roster selection less than a month away, it’s reasonable to expect that roughly a third of the #USMNT squad will come from MLS. Below is a positional breakdown of the MLS players Mauricio Pochettino has called in during his tenure as USMNT manager.
Goalkeepers
The USMNT is set to start an MLS-based goalkeeper at a World Cup for the first time, with all of the top options currently playing in MLS.
Chris Brady is one of the goalkeepers I’m most excited to watch in the coming cycles. He’s been performing at a high level in Major League Soccer and looks like a strong candidate to fill the long-term role as the USMNT’s primary starter over the next few cycles.

Chris Brady
Roman Celentano
Matt Freese
Patrick Schulte
Matt Turner
Defenders
Veteran center-backs Tim Ream and Miles Robinson seem likely to be selected with Blackmon a possibility depending on the health of the remaining pool. Arfsten seems to be almost a lock due to his ability to attack and create scoring chances with his crosses from the wing.

Max Arfsten
Tristan Blackmon
Tim Ream
Miles Robinson
Midfielders
The USMNT has strong depth in midfield, and Mauricio Pochettino’s recent roster selections suggest he’ll likely round out the squad with some of the players listed below.
One of the biggest gaps in this USMNT roster is the true dynamic, creative spark in the attacking third. Diego Luna stands out in that role, capable of unsettling defenses, breaking lines, and changing the rhythm of a match. He’s exactly the type of player who could thrive in a super-sub role, coming on against tired legs and making an impact at this summer’s World Cup.

Sebastian Berhalter
Diego Luna
Jack McGlynn
Cristian Roldan
Timothy Tillman
Forwards
Striker may be the toughest position for the MLS group to crack the #USMNT World Cup roster, but Brian White is making a strong case, scoring eight goals in his first nine MLS matches at the time of writing.
Brian White is a highly productive, “old-school” style striker for the USMNT, known for his elite positioning, relentless work rate, and ability to finish in a variety of ways. That combination makes him a strong option as a striker off the bench, where he could be especially dangerous against tired defenses at this summer’s World Cup.

Paxten Aaronson
Josh Sargent
Brian White
MLS Representation in the USMNT Player Pool
Since 1998, the last time the majority of a USMNT World Cup roster was composed primarily of MLS-based players, it has become increasingly clear that a meaningful portion of the squad still comes from MLS. Consistently, roughly 30–40% of the roster has been drawn from the domestic league, reflecting a long-standing and relatively stable trend in player selection over time which I don’t seen changing anytime soon.
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
In light of the recent resignation of Matt Crocker, I revisited something I wrote nearly a decade ago, an early attempt to capture what I called the “Dark Decades of US Soccer.” At the time, the piece was overly long and packed with detail—probably more than today’s audience would stick with.
But buried in that work were meaningful patterns, clear, recurring behaviors that shaped how the federation operated more than 60 years ago. What stood out most, looking back now, is how familiar some of those patterns still feel today.
So, I went back, stripped the piece down, and pulled out the most relevant sections, those that highlight the parallels between past and present. The goal isn’t to draw conclusions for you, but to put those similarities side by side and let you decide: how much has really changed?
World Cup Momentum to the First American Soccer Boom

Photo of Pele at the 1966 World Cup
Photograph: AP Photo
After the success and popularity of the 1966 World Cup which saw over one million viewers of the tournament many America investors saw the vision and believed that there was the market for soccer in the United States and Canada.
The investors moved very quickly and in 1967 there were two American professional leagues making their debuts the USSFA-sanctioned United Soccer Association (USA) and the independent National Professional Soccer League (NPSL).
These leagues would only last one year and be merged at the request of FIFA into the North American Soccer League (NASL) kicking off in 1968 and relying on mainly on foreign talent. The American investors believed building the interest in soccer in the US would have a direct impact on the growth and performance of the US Men’s National team which and of course more money for the investors and federation.
First Attempt at Modernizing the USMNT

Phil Woosnam, in 1977 as the commissioner of the NASL.
Photograph: AP Photo
Off the back of the success of the inaugural NASL season, the U.S. Soccer Federation appointed Phil Woosnam, fresh off leading the Atlanta Chiefs to a championship and earning Coach of the Year honors, to take charge of the U.S. Men’s National Team.
Woosnam immediately shifted the structure of the program. Instead of a player pool selected by committee, he pushed decision-making toward the coaching staff, allowing selections to be based on performance and fit rather than geography or internal bias. The move was not universally welcomed, and it reportedly created friction with members of the federation’s leadership.
With professional players now more fully available, Woosnam’s approach helped assemble what was widely considered the strongest possible squad at the time. He also introduced organized training camps ahead of friendlies and World Cup qualifiers, an uncommon practice in that era, but one that clearly improved cohesion and preparation. Those changes contributed to the U.S. advancing further in World Cup qualifying than it had in previous cycles.
By early 1969, the USMNT appeared to be building real momentum toward a potential place in the 1970 World Cup. However, tensions between Woosnam and the federation began to escalate. Frustrated with compensation issues and growing interference from the USSF in team operations, Woosnam stepped away from the national team in the spring of 1969. become commissioner of the NASL.
Following his departure, assistant coach Gordon Jago took over as manager. His tenure began under difficult circumstances, with not being able to set up pre-qualifying friendlies, an important part of the progress made under Woosnam along with interference from USSF board members as it related to roster selection which created instability and morale issues on the field. The USMNT struggled in qualifying and ultimately fell short, losing both matches to Haiti, a team they had previously been competitive with in a series of friendlies in 1968.
The Crocker Era: Coaching Chaos and Course Corrections

Photo of Cindy Parlow Cone, Gregg Berhalter, Matt Crocker and JT Batson
Photograph: AP Photo/Lucas Peliter
It’s been roughly three years since the Matt Crocker era began at U.S. Soccer, when he stepped in as Sporting Director, replacing Earnie Stewart.
One of Crocker’s first major responsibilities was hiring the next U.S. Men’s National Team manager. In the previous cycle, the federation had reportedly operated with a narrow set of internal criteria, preferences widely believed to favor English-speaking and American candidates, which significantly limited the coaching pool and shaped the direction of the search.
Roughly two months later, during the Concacaf Nations League semifinal window, it was announced that Gregg Berhalter would be reappointed as USMNT head coach. The decision caught many around the program and in the media off guard, raising questions about how the process had ultimately unfolded.
More recently, in an interview with GiveMeSport, Jesse Marsch stated he was effectively told he was set to become the next USMNT head coach in the late spring of 2023, only for that opportunity to be withdrawn at the last moment, a shift that reportedly had ripple effects on a potential move to Leicester City that was nearing completion.
The abrupt reversal and eventual rehiring of Berhalter has been widely attributed to a mix of factors, including rumored influence from within the player pool, with U.S. Soccer ultimately reversing course. Roughly a year later, after a disappointing Copa América campaign on home soil, Berhalter was dismissed.
Crocker’s second opportunity to reset the program took a different direction. He first secured the high-profile appointment of Emma Hayes, one of the most accomplished managers in women’s football, to lead the USWNT. That move was followed by the hiring of Mauricio Pochettino for the USMNT, a tenure that has delivered mixed early results and will ultimately be judged through the lens of the 2026 World Cup on home soil but truly disappointed that Crocker wouldn’t see through what he helped build, and you have to ask yourself why?
USMNT
The No. 9 Timeline: A Historical Look at USMNT Strikers
Published
4 weeks agoon
April 10, 2026
Thomas Deschaine (@uskeeper on X and us_keeper on Instagram)
Each generation of soccer can be understood through overlapping eras, each one feeding into the next. Some produce deeper pools of talent, while others rely on a handful of standout players. In a recent piece, I looked back at past USMNT goalkeepers and their impact on World Cup teams. That led to a natural follow-up: a deeper dive into the history of USMNT strikers.
For this article, I’ve divided that history into three distinct eras, focusing strictly on past strikers rather than the current pool. I’ll wrap up, however, with some thoughts on where today’s active strikers fit into that broader timeline. For each era I will spotlight four strikers.
According to their media guide, the modern era of the USMNT begins with the 1990 World Cup cycle. While that framing makes some sense, it does gloss over some of the program’s more challenging decades. For the purposes of this, though, we’ll start there as well, especially considering that from 1974 to 1986, the USMNT averaged fewer than 20 matches per cycle and scored less than a goal per game across those four cycles.
Trailblazers: The Early Era of USMNT Strikers
The story of USMNT strikers stretches back nearly 40 years, to a time when goals were often hard to come by, but a handful of players still managed to leave a lasting impression. This was an era defined less by consistent production and more by moments, flashes of quality that stood out during a formative period for the program.
Players like Chris Sullivan, Eric Eichmann, Frank Klopas, and Roy Wegerle all played roles in at least one World Cup cycle and delivered important goals along the way. However, consistency and longevity at the international level proved elusive, reflecting the broader challenges the USMNT faced during this period.
Even so, these players helped lay the groundwork for future generations, establishing the foundation for what the striker position would eventually become.

Bruce Murray (1985 – 1993)
85 Caps, 21 goals, 11 assists
A quick, opportunistic forward known for his movement and ability to capitalize on chances, Bruce Murray was the type of striker the USMNT hadn’t truly seen before. He filled that role throughout the 1990 cycle and into the lead-up to 1994, emerging as the team’s leading scorer during that stretch and helping guide the U.S. to its first World Cup appearance since 1950. At the 1990 World Cup, Murray contributed a goal and an assist, highlighting his impact on the international stage.
Despite his contributions, Murray was ultimately left off the 1994 World Cup squad, one of the final cuts as the program began to turn toward younger options and players competing in Europe at the time.
Eric Wynalda (1990 – 2000)
106 Caps, 34 goals, 17 assists
The premier striker of this era for the USMNT, Eric Wynalda featured in three consecutive World Cups. A dynamic and confident forward, he combined technical ability with a powerful shot, making him a constant goal threat and the focal point of the U.S. attack.
His iconic set-piece goal against Switzerland in the USMNT’s opening match of the 1994 FIFA World Cup remains one of the greatest in tournament history and stands among the best goals ever scored by the USMNT. Wynalda not only delivered in defining moments but also set the tone and standard for the strikers who followed.
Earnie Stewart (1990 – 2004)
101 Caps, 17 goals, 10 assists
Earnie Stewart was a key attacking figure for the USMNT throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, bringing a blend of technical quality, intelligence, and consistency to the squad. Comfortable as both a striker and a second forward, his versatility allowed him to influence matches in multiple ways while effectively linking midfield and attack.
While not a traditional No. 9, Stewart’s movement, awareness, and all-around contributions helped shape the evolution of the USMNT’s forward line during a critical period of growth for the program. He appeared in three World Cups—the 1994 FIFA World Cup, 1998 FIFA World Cup, and 2002 FIFA World Cup—and delivered one of the most iconic moments in U.S. soccer history, scoring the game-winning goal against heavily favored Colombia on home soil in 1994.
Second Generation USMNT Strikers (1996-2010)
The next era of USMNT strikers following the 1994 World Cup produced a tough, hard-nosed group. Several featured in one or more World Cup cycles, led by Josh Wolff, who made both the 2002 and 2006 squads.
Brian Ching and Eddie Johnson were also key figures, earning spots on the 2006 roster, with some arguing they were overlooked later in their careers. Other notable names from that period include Casey Coner, Ante Razov, and Taylor Twellman, players who all had opportunities with the USMNT, but whose form and timing didn’t quite align with World Cup selection. Twellman, in particular, still believes he should have been part of the 2006 squad.

Joe-Max Moore (1992 – 2002)
100 Caps, 24 goals, 14 assists
This was always a bit of a sneaky one for me. Joe-Max Moore was a consistently reliable attacking option for the USMNT during this era, even if he didn’t always get the spotlight. Currently ranked seventh all-time in USMNT goals, Moore contributed across three World Cup cycles and remained a steady presence in the attack.
He’s also one of just five USMNT players to score four goals in a single match, a standout performance that came against El Salvador in 1993. Despite his overall production and longevity, however, Moore was never able to find the back of the net on the World Cup (1994, 1998 and 2002) stage.
Brian McBride (1993 – 2006)
95 Caps, 30 goals, 11 assists
A traditional No. 9, Brian McBride was physical, relentless, and dependable, with a dominant aerial presence in the biggest moments. He put everything on the line for the USMNT, scoring in multiple World Cups (1998 and 2002) and cementing himself as a fixture at the striker position.
One of his most iconic moments came at the 2006 World Cup, when he was elbowed in the face by Italy’s Daniele De Rossi, leaving him bloodied and in need of stitches, yet he still played the full 90 minutes.
Clint Mathis (1998 – 2005)
46 Caps, 12 goals, 9 assists
While Clint Mathis had a relatively brief run with the USMNT, his impact on the attacking position was undeniable. Often deployed as a second striker behind Brian McBride, Mathis was anything but traditional—he thrived as a free-roaming attacker capable of changing a match in an instant, highlighted by his ability to score spectacular long-range goals.
He played a key role for the U.S. at the 2002 FIFA World Cup, scoring a memorable goal against South Korea in the group stage and adding an assist, helping power the team’s historic run.
The Evolving Striker Pool (2009 – 2018)
The striker pool from this generation is an interesting mix, some players were only involved with the USMNT for brief stretches, while others carried over from the previous era and overlapped with this group.
Strikers like Edson Buddle and Hercules Gomez, both part of the 2010 World Cup roster, had limited opportunities and production at the international level. Their inclusion was shaped in part by circumstance, as Charlie Davies’ recovery from his car accident less than a year before the tournament ultimately ruled him out of contention.
Looking ahead to 2014, Aron Jóhannsson and Chris Wondolowski earned World Cup roster spots but struggled to make a lasting impact in the biggest matches against top-tier opponents, which limited their long-term roles with the national team.
Players like Jordan Morris, Jesús Ferreira, and Gyasi Zardes emerged and saw increased opportunities following the failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup. It’s easy to imagine that at least some of that younger group could have factored into the roster had the U.S. made it to Russia.

Clint Dempsey (2004 – 2017)
141 Caps, 57 goals, 19 assists
Clint Dempsey delivered some of the most iconic striker moments in USMNT history, big goals, clutch performances, and a relentless ability to show up when it mattered most. While he wasn’t a traditional target striker, his movement, instincts, and technical ability made him one of the most dangerous attacking players the U.S. has ever had.
He scored against top-tier opponents like Spain and Brazil at the 2009 Confederations Cup, found the net against England at the 2010 World Cup to help secure a crucial draw, and famously opened the scoring just seconds into the 2014 World Cup. He also delivered in the 2016 Copa América, with key goals against Ecuador in the quarterfinal and Paraguay in the group stage.
Dempsey wasn’t just a scorer, he was a moment-maker. Whether it was a scrappy finish, a composed strike, or stepping up in the biggest matches, he consistently delivered when the U.S. needed him most.
Jozy Altidore (2007 – 2019)
115 Caps, 42 goals, 14 assists
Jozy Altidore had a unique USMNT career, less about highlight-reel volume and more about physical presence, hold-up play, and stepping up in key moments. At his best, he was the focal point of the attack and a difference-maker. Jozy’s work ethic seemed to impact later stages of his club and USMNT career and impacted him becoming the all-time leading scorer in USMNT history.
Bobby Wood (2013 – 2018)
43 Caps, 13 goals, 3 assists
If it weren’t for Jürgen Klinsmann’s support after Bobby Wood secured a new club in Germany, it’s unclear whether his international career would have continued. While his peak was relatively brief at both club and national level, Wood made his mark with clutch moments, most memorably scoring game-winning goals in back-to-back 2015 friendlies: a 4–3 comeback victory over the Netherlands and a 2–1 win against Germany.
The Next Generation: Assessing the Future of USMNT Strikers
The current USMNT striker pool remains very unsettled. At the moment, Ricardo Pepi is the only regular forward to reach double-digit goals, with 13. He’s followed by Folarin Balogun with eight and Haji Wright with seven. Other notable names in the mix include Josh Sargent and Patrick Agyemang, each of whom has contributed five goals at the international level. However, Agyemang suffered an Achilles injury and has been ruled out of the World Cup, a significant setback given his recent form. For the USMNT to be successful at the 2026 FIFA World Cup their strikers will be a key role and contributing to the teams’ goals scored.

From a club perspective at the time of the article, Balogun is in excellent form, and the hope is that continues through the 2026 FIFA World Cup. At this point, it feels clear that Balogun and Pepi have established themselves as the top two striker options. The bigger question, though, is who else will step up to provide the depth and quality needed to sustain the position in this cycle and beyond.
The Expanding Impact of MLS on the World Cup
The More Things Change, The More They Remain the Same
The No. 9 Timeline: A Historical Look at USMNT Strikers
Trending
-
Club News2 years agoAmerican Transfers: Stock Up & Stock Down
-
USMNT2 years agoUSMNT Kits Come in Different Styles and Colors
-
Club News6 years agoCJ dos Santos, Benfica
-
USMNT6 years agoA Hidden Gem: Barça Residency Academy
-
Club News6 years agoJulian Vincente Araujo
-
USMNT3 years ago
World Cup Format History
-
USMNT2 years agoIs the MLS Specifically Targeting Expansion to USL Cities?
-
MLS4 years ago2022 Youth Series: MLS Club Youth Talent Rankings
